ADVERTISEMENT

War Monger Obama just killed two Americans with no trial

Meanwhile he's been working his ass off to send terrorists from Guantanamo back home to do more terrorist stuff because he made a promise, and Obama doesn't break promises, giggle.

He kills Americans suspected of supporting ISIS over there while trying to bring a bunch of folks who may support ISIS to your backyard. Brilliant man. Just brilliant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: imprimis
Guys, sys is the the ultimate liberal suck up troll. Put him on ignore, never click on "show ignored content" and after a few months he'll be dead to you. The guy has no individual thoughts or opinions. He is a member of the brainwashed cult who will never find fault with his party. That's what I like most about this board, we will chastise our own if we disagree with them and have good conversation, he won't. Oh, and cup is the same way, ignore. Don't waste my time with them. davidallen, pilt, wood and a few moderates seem like decent guys and are at least objective at times .
 
Last edited:
How many were under the age of 18? Or is the count still just one? I guess I will say at least these one's were "expected" of having terrorist ties. The kid's only crime was being the son of a terrorist, also a US citizen and they tried to keep it hush hush. Guess this brings the count of US citizens assassinated without trial by the CIC to four. Had GWB done this they'd call for his head. Fvcking hypocrites!!!
 
Did he call any Radical Islamists before or after blowing them to smithereens?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
where are lying @syskatine come on I am waiting on your smug holier then thou response. Obama is a murdered straight up.
 
prove me wrong lying @syskatine until then you are just another sheep. Come on big smart lawyer prove this idiot wrong. Link?
 
This is the stuff that Trump (and of course Hillary) will keep doing.
 
prove me wrong lying @syskatine until then you are just another sheep. Come on big smart lawyer prove this idiot wrong. Link?

Did he take out American-born terrorists in the ISIS campaign? Is that what you're talking about?

If he was breaking the law there's republican prosecutors and judges all over the country. Anything filed? Republicans will launch a special investigation over dandruff and its GOP senate and house. Any investigations? I haven't heard of any of this. Link?
 
Sitting here waiting on this lazy liberal to prove ole Johnny wrong. Where is your link debunking me little missy? lying @syskatine
 
Well it seems like not only does Obama go around the courts but 90% of his drone strikes kill innocent people. Seems like Obama has a real taste for killing.

I will post this for the lazy lying liberal @syskatine

Also lazy lying liberal @syskatine most my facts I post can be searched on a site called google. I don't know if you have heard of this site since your level of stupidity is off the charts. Get a brain and do some of your OWN research and learn something.
 
Since you and your clone both only seem to understand pictures. Here are some pictures to look at lazy lying liberal @syskatine
obama.bush.pakistan.drone.strikes.infograhic.gif


20150919_woc729.png

ebolavswar.png

dessin-obama-drone.jpg
 
deflect quick the man Johnny is bombarding me with intelligence that is above my level of thinking. I lazy lying liberal @syskatine must come up with something stupid to say so it will take away from the ass beating I am taking in this thread.

You know who I like lazy lying liberal @syskatine? This guy....

giphy.gif
 
I am gonna leave these with lazy lying liberal @syskatine maybe she can come up with a good zinger after the weekend....

cartoon-obama-predator-drone-joystick.jpg
 
I've dominated the second amendment discussion on these boards for years, to the point I've moved on. You don't see K.D. in pickup games down at the Y, and you don't see me arguing gun control on these boards much anymore. I'll review the status quo on here:

Mega doesn't know what the hell be believes, he has an "artistic" view of the second amendment that basically boils down to freedoms n' shit. He also has a nice 70's Colt .223 that he won't trade. He is a representative of the legions of conservatives that want the biggest losers in our culture having the ability to kill lots of people very quickly, with very little ingenuity, bravery or intelligence. He likes the ability for any nitwit to have his own revolution at any minute, and create dozens of tragedies in people's lives. He stammers and insults when this is brought up and defaults to second amendment and freedoms n' shit (everyone else can get f#*@ed -- his adolescent phantasy of armed rebellion trumps protecting the innocent.) He also wears leotards. I acknowledge that may not seem relevant, but I think the world in general should be alerted when a man wearing leotards is spotted with a .223. You're all on notice.

Thor: Strict second amendment literalist (he thinks). Private individuals should have the same weaponry as the government under the second amendment. The stuff that he doesn't want isn't an "arm" -- he just re-defines the word "arm" to exclude whatever he isn't subjectively comfortable with. The terms to arms control all these years? They only meant rifles. Not tanks or missiles -- all those negotiations of arms control all these years were about reducing rifles. Thor and I are in closer agreement than he likes to admit --we're both for "arms" control, we just disagree on which arms. Oh -- real linear thinker. Like real linear.

Medic: Sys has 30 guns. He's for gun control, so he's a hypocrite.
Sys: Medic literally can't differentiate between hypocrisy and intellectual honesty. He also admitted believing that the science of carbon affecting weather should be left to non-scientists that receive funding from people that don't care about the issue, which is, of course, nobody. He literally believes that. Since he admitted that, I haven't bothered engaging him as he's pure dogma.

Brad: We just f@*&% don't like each other because he has chickenshit oozing out of his pores, and any debate ends up in a personal piss fight. We've both generally quit tasting the cheese.

The other board mental gymnastics are explaining away the European and Aussie examples of gun control (e.g. they don't matter, or they include suicides that don't count, or explain it away because other property crimes go up.) and torturing the plain text of the second amendment (arms, well regulated, militia, plainly expressed purpose of state security, etc.) and all supporting conclusory arguments.

Oh -- we've all sort of quit posting the anecdotal stories -- I'll do it every 30 or 40th mass shooting if it's really public, but a single anecdote just results in me pointing out statistics and rinse and repeat.

The gun control arguments on this board must come through me. I have won them all, multiple times over, to the point where it's just needlessly distracting from more thought provoking arguments. I am undefeated, the obsession with keeping semi-auto guns accessible to everyone has proven to be regressive and destructive, and that's pretty much the status of the second amendment on these boards. If anybody has a good reason why I'm wrong, I'd like to hear it, but there hasn't been on posited on these boards yet, and I've been here for years.
 
How many people has warmonger Obama killed with his drone army? How many Americans has he killed with out due process? You are the only hypocrite I see in this thread little lazy lying liberal @syskatine.
 
I've dominated the second amendment discussion on these boards for years, to the point I've moved on. You don't see K.D. in pickup games down at the Y, and you don't see me arguing gun control on these boards much anymore. I'll review the status quo on here:

Mega doesn't know what the hell be believes, he has an "artistic" view of the second amendment that basically boils down to freedoms n' shit. He also has a nice 70's Colt .223 that he won't trade. He is a representative of the legions of conservatives that want the biggest losers in our culture having the ability to kill lots of people very quickly, with very little ingenuity, bravery or intelligence. He likes the ability for any nitwit to have his own revolution at any minute, and create dozens of tragedies in people's lives. He stammers and insults when this is brought up and defaults to second amendment and freedoms n' shit (everyone else can get f#*@ed -- his adolescent phantasy of armed rebellion trumps protecting the innocent.) He also wears leotards. I acknowledge that may not seem relevant, but I think the world in general should be alerted when a man wearing leotards is spotted with a .223. You're all on notice.

Thor: Strict second amendment literalist (he thinks). Private individuals should have the same weaponry as the government under the second amendment. The stuff that he doesn't want isn't an "arm" -- he just re-defines the word "arm" to exclude whatever he isn't subjectively comfortable with. The terms to arms control all these years? They only meant rifles. Not tanks or missiles -- all those negotiations of arms control all these years were about reducing rifles. Thor and I are in closer agreement than he likes to admit --we're both for "arms" control, we just disagree on which arms. Oh -- real linear thinker. Like real linear.

Medic: Sys has 30 guns. He's for gun control, so he's a hypocrite.
Sys: Medic literally can't differentiate between hypocrisy and intellectual honesty. He also admitted believing that the science of carbon affecting weather should be left to non-scientists that receive funding from people that don't care about the issue, which is, of course, nobody. He literally believes that. Since he admitted that, I haven't bothered engaging him as he's pure dogma.

Brad: We just f@*&% don't like each other because he has chickenshit oozing out of his pores, and any debate ends up in a personal piss fight. We've both generally quit tasting the cheese.

The other board mental gymnastics are explaining away the European and Aussie examples of gun control (e.g. they don't matter, or they include suicides that don't count, or explain it away because other property crimes go up.) and torturing the plain text of the second amendment (arms, well regulated, militia, plainly expressed purpose of state security, etc.) and all supporting conclusory arguments.

Oh -- we've all sort of quit posting the anecdotal stories -- I'll do it every 30 or 40th mass shooting if it's really public, but a single anecdote just results in me pointing out statistics and rinse and repeat.

The gun control arguments on this board must come through me. I have won them all, multiple times over, to the point where it's just needlessly distracting from more thought provoking arguments. I am undefeated, the obsession with keeping semi-auto guns accessible to everyone has proven to be regressive and destructive, and that's pretty much the status of the second amendment on these boards. If anybody has a good reason why I'm wrong, I'd like to hear it, but there hasn't been on posited on these boards yet, and I've been here for years.

You are less of a dominator and more of a punching bag. Less KD and more Big Roy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
I've dominated the second amendment discussion on these boards for years, to the point I've moved on. You don't see K.D. in pickup games down at the Y, and you don't see me arguing gun control on these boards much anymore. I'll review the status quo on here:

Mega doesn't know what the hell be believes, he has an "artistic" view of the second amendment that basically boils down to freedoms n' shit. He also has a nice 70's Colt .223 that he won't trade. He is a representative of the legions of conservatives that want the biggest losers in our culture having the ability to kill lots of people very quickly, with very little ingenuity, bravery or intelligence. He likes the ability for any nitwit to have his own revolution at any minute, and create dozens of tragedies in people's lives. He stammers and insults when this is brought up and defaults to second amendment and freedoms n' shit (everyone else can get f#*@ed -- his adolescent phantasy of armed rebellion trumps protecting the innocent.) He also wears leotards. I acknowledge that may not seem relevant, but I think the world in general should be alerted when a man wearing leotards is spotted with a .223. You're all on notice.

Thor: Strict second amendment literalist (he thinks). Private individuals should have the same weaponry as the government under the second amendment. The stuff that he doesn't want isn't an "arm" -- he just re-defines the word "arm" to exclude whatever he isn't subjectively comfortable with. The terms to arms control all these years? They only meant rifles. Not tanks or missiles -- all those negotiations of arms control all these years were about reducing rifles. Thor and I are in closer agreement than he likes to admit --we're both for "arms" control, we just disagree on which arms. Oh -- real linear thinker. Like real linear.

Medic: Sys has 30 guns. He's for gun control, so he's a hypocrite.
Sys: Medic literally can't differentiate between hypocrisy and intellectual honesty. He also admitted believing that the science of carbon affecting weather should be left to non-scientists that receive funding from people that don't care about the issue, which is, of course, nobody. He literally believes that. Since he admitted that, I haven't bothered engaging him as he's pure dogma.

Brad: We just f@*&% don't like each other because he has chickenshit oozing out of his pores, and any debate ends up in a personal piss fight. We've both generally quit tasting the cheese.

The other board mental gymnastics are explaining away the European and Aussie examples of gun control (e.g. they don't matter, or they include suicides that don't count, or explain it away because other property crimes go up.) and torturing the plain text of the second amendment (arms, well regulated, militia, plainly expressed purpose of state security, etc.) and all supporting conclusory arguments.

Oh -- we've all sort of quit posting the anecdotal stories -- I'll do it every 30 or 40th mass shooting if it's really public, but a single anecdote just results in me pointing out statistics and rinse and repeat.

The gun control arguments on this board must come through me. I have won them all, multiple times over, to the point where it's just needlessly distracting from more thought provoking arguments. I am undefeated, the obsession with keeping semi-auto guns accessible to everyone has proven to be regressive and destructive, and that's pretty much the status of the second amendment on these boards. If anybody has a good reason why I'm wrong, I'd like to hear it, but there hasn't been on posited on these boards yet, and I've been here for years.
Easy translation. You've been owned. Did you type all of that nonsense to convince yourself? Everybody on this board knows you have zero knowledge of the Second Amendment outside of the usual leftist talking points. I mean everybody knows this.

I suspect you do as well and that's why you dodge, deflect, and then run from the discussion. If you knew anything about the Second Amendment you'd be able to debate it without looking stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CBradSmith
"He also admitted believing that the science of carbon affecting weather should be left to non-scientists that receive funding from people that don't care about the issue, which is, of course, nobody. He literally believes that. Since he admitted that, I haven't bothered engaging him as he's pure dogma."
 
"He also admitted believing that the science of carbon affecting weather should be left to non-scientists that receive funding from people that don't care about the issue, which is, of course, nobody. He literally believes that. Since he admitted that, I haven't bothered engaging him as he's pure dogma."
Uh huh. Chickenshit response from you. It's cool. I'll gladly wait until your next regurgitation of liberal talking points about guns and the Second Amendment to have more fun at your expense.
 
How many Americans has Obama killed with out due process hiding behind his drone army? Lazy lying liberal @syskatine
He won't discuss it. It makes Dear Leader look bad and the liberal lemmings don't discuss anything that makes Dear Leader look bad. It's in the Party doctrine. Reminds me of North Korea.
 
He won't discuss it. It makes Dear Leader look bad and the liberal lemmings don't discuss anything that makes Dear Leader look bad. It's in the Party doctrine. Reminds me of North Korea.

Uh, hate to dispute your NK reference, but this shit is classic "sieg heil" .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
Where is lazy lying liberal @syskatine to refute his king Obama isn't in fact killing Americans with out due process? I thought you were so much smarter then dumb ole Johnny. I guess my domination is just to much for ole lying @syskatine and his warmonger buddy Obama.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
Where is lazy lying liberal @syskatine to refute his king Obama isn't in fact killing Americans with out due process? I thought you were so much smarter then dumb ole Johnny. I guess my domination is just to much for ole lying @syskatine and his warmonger buddy Obama.
Odumbass and Hildebitch are both war mongers. They armed terrorists to overthrow the legitimate government of Libya and conducted the US bombing of the legitimate government military to support the terrorists, all in the name of preventing "genocide." It wasn't really genocide, but legitimate military action against known terrorists that was the target. Unlike Bush, Obombya did it illegally without congressional approval.

If anybody should be ashamed of war mongering it should be the Left who has empowered King Kenyan the First to use his presidency as a means to kill American citizens in complete disregard of the Constitution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JonnyVito
Man is ole lazy lying liberal @syskatine drop off to a cave or something. I guess when you have her defeated she just quits talking and drops off the face of the Earth. I guess she can't admit that king Obama has faults and isn't perfect. I guess she can't really say much after all the bashing she did towards Bush who had the backing of Congress unlike Obama who just does what ever he likes. IMO Obama wins the warmonger award. But we won't be hearing from lazy lying liberal @syskatine anytime soon because I am dominating her right now!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
Man is ole lazy lying liberal @syskatine drop off to a cave or something. I guess when you have her defeated she just quits talking and drops off the face of the Earth. I guess she can't admit that king Obama has faults and isn't perfect. I guess she can't really say much after all the bashing she did towards Bush who had the backing of Congress unlike Obama who just does what ever he likes. IMO Obama wins the warmonger award. But we won't be hearing from lazy lying liberal @syskatine anytime soon because I am dominating her right now!!!!

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT