prove me wrong lying @syskatine until then you are just another sheep. Come on big smart lawyer prove this idiot wrong. Link?
Johnny, just because you heard something doesn't mean the rest of the world has heard it, too.
Link?
Johnny is bombarding me with intelligence
You sure disappeared from the Second Amendment discussion...You wanna know who JonnyV is? I'll tell you. He's half Braveheart (see his meme), half Bismark. Then another half is like a young Cassius Clay. He is....
You sure disappeared from the Second Amendment discussion...
Hahaha! I think that's JVito's leg.Well, to be fair, it looks like he's busy humping somebody's leg there in that pic....
You sure disappeared from the Second Amendment discussion...
I've dominated the second amendment discussion on these boards for years, to the point I've moved on. You don't see K.D. in pickup games down at the Y, and you don't see me arguing gun control on these boards much anymore. I'll review the status quo on here:
Mega doesn't know what the hell be believes, he has an "artistic" view of the second amendment that basically boils down to freedoms n' shit. He also has a nice 70's Colt .223 that he won't trade. He is a representative of the legions of conservatives that want the biggest losers in our culture having the ability to kill lots of people very quickly, with very little ingenuity, bravery or intelligence. He likes the ability for any nitwit to have his own revolution at any minute, and create dozens of tragedies in people's lives. He stammers and insults when this is brought up and defaults to second amendment and freedoms n' shit (everyone else can get f#*@ed -- his adolescent phantasy of armed rebellion trumps protecting the innocent.) He also wears leotards. I acknowledge that may not seem relevant, but I think the world in general should be alerted when a man wearing leotards is spotted with a .223. You're all on notice.
Thor: Strict second amendment literalist (he thinks). Private individuals should have the same weaponry as the government under the second amendment. The stuff that he doesn't want isn't an "arm" -- he just re-defines the word "arm" to exclude whatever he isn't subjectively comfortable with. The terms to arms control all these years? They only meant rifles. Not tanks or missiles -- all those negotiations of arms control all these years were about reducing rifles. Thor and I are in closer agreement than he likes to admit --we're both for "arms" control, we just disagree on which arms. Oh -- real linear thinker. Like real linear.
Medic: Sys has 30 guns. He's for gun control, so he's a hypocrite.
Sys: Medic literally can't differentiate between hypocrisy and intellectual honesty. He also admitted believing that the science of carbon affecting weather should be left to non-scientists that receive funding from people that don't care about the issue, which is, of course, nobody. He literally believes that. Since he admitted that, I haven't bothered engaging him as he's pure dogma.
Brad: We just f@*&% don't like each other because he has chickenshit oozing out of his pores, and any debate ends up in a personal piss fight. We've both generally quit tasting the cheese.
The other board mental gymnastics are explaining away the European and Aussie examples of gun control (e.g. they don't matter, or they include suicides that don't count, or explain it away because other property crimes go up.) and torturing the plain text of the second amendment (arms, well regulated, militia, plainly expressed purpose of state security, etc.) and all supporting conclusory arguments.
Oh -- we've all sort of quit posting the anecdotal stories -- I'll do it every 30 or 40th mass shooting if it's really public, but a single anecdote just results in me pointing out statistics and rinse and repeat.
The gun control arguments on this board must come through me. I have won them all, multiple times over, to the point where it's just needlessly distracting from more thought provoking arguments. I am undefeated, the obsession with keeping semi-auto guns accessible to everyone has proven to be regressive and destructive, and that's pretty much the status of the second amendment on these boards. If anybody has a good reason why I'm wrong, I'd like to hear it, but there hasn't been on posited on these boards yet, and I've been here for years.
You are less of a dominator and more of a punching bag. Less KD and more Big Roy.
Easy translation. You've been owned. Did you type all of that nonsense to convince yourself? Everybody on this board knows you have zero knowledge of the Second Amendment outside of the usual leftist talking points. I mean everybody knows this.I've dominated the second amendment discussion on these boards for years, to the point I've moved on. You don't see K.D. in pickup games down at the Y, and you don't see me arguing gun control on these boards much anymore. I'll review the status quo on here:
Mega doesn't know what the hell be believes, he has an "artistic" view of the second amendment that basically boils down to freedoms n' shit. He also has a nice 70's Colt .223 that he won't trade. He is a representative of the legions of conservatives that want the biggest losers in our culture having the ability to kill lots of people very quickly, with very little ingenuity, bravery or intelligence. He likes the ability for any nitwit to have his own revolution at any minute, and create dozens of tragedies in people's lives. He stammers and insults when this is brought up and defaults to second amendment and freedoms n' shit (everyone else can get f#*@ed -- his adolescent phantasy of armed rebellion trumps protecting the innocent.) He also wears leotards. I acknowledge that may not seem relevant, but I think the world in general should be alerted when a man wearing leotards is spotted with a .223. You're all on notice.
Thor: Strict second amendment literalist (he thinks). Private individuals should have the same weaponry as the government under the second amendment. The stuff that he doesn't want isn't an "arm" -- he just re-defines the word "arm" to exclude whatever he isn't subjectively comfortable with. The terms to arms control all these years? They only meant rifles. Not tanks or missiles -- all those negotiations of arms control all these years were about reducing rifles. Thor and I are in closer agreement than he likes to admit --we're both for "arms" control, we just disagree on which arms. Oh -- real linear thinker. Like real linear.
Medic: Sys has 30 guns. He's for gun control, so he's a hypocrite.
Sys: Medic literally can't differentiate between hypocrisy and intellectual honesty. He also admitted believing that the science of carbon affecting weather should be left to non-scientists that receive funding from people that don't care about the issue, which is, of course, nobody. He literally believes that. Since he admitted that, I haven't bothered engaging him as he's pure dogma.
Brad: We just f@*&% don't like each other because he has chickenshit oozing out of his pores, and any debate ends up in a personal piss fight. We've both generally quit tasting the cheese.
The other board mental gymnastics are explaining away the European and Aussie examples of gun control (e.g. they don't matter, or they include suicides that don't count, or explain it away because other property crimes go up.) and torturing the plain text of the second amendment (arms, well regulated, militia, plainly expressed purpose of state security, etc.) and all supporting conclusory arguments.
Oh -- we've all sort of quit posting the anecdotal stories -- I'll do it every 30 or 40th mass shooting if it's really public, but a single anecdote just results in me pointing out statistics and rinse and repeat.
The gun control arguments on this board must come through me. I have won them all, multiple times over, to the point where it's just needlessly distracting from more thought provoking arguments. I am undefeated, the obsession with keeping semi-auto guns accessible to everyone has proven to be regressive and destructive, and that's pretty much the status of the second amendment on these boards. If anybody has a good reason why I'm wrong, I'd like to hear it, but there hasn't been on posited on these boards yet, and I've been here for years.
Uh huh. Chickenshit response from you. It's cool. I'll gladly wait until your next regurgitation of liberal talking points about guns and the Second Amendment to have more fun at your expense."He also admitted believing that the science of carbon affecting weather should be left to non-scientists that receive funding from people that don't care about the issue, which is, of course, nobody. He literally believes that. Since he admitted that, I haven't bothered engaging him as he's pure dogma."
He won't discuss it. It makes Dear Leader look bad and the liberal lemmings don't discuss anything that makes Dear Leader look bad. It's in the Party doctrine. Reminds me of North Korea.How many Americans has Obama killed with out due process hiding behind his drone army? Lazy lying liberal @syskatine
He won't discuss it. It makes Dear Leader look bad and the liberal lemmings don't discuss anything that makes Dear Leader look bad. It's in the Party doctrine. Reminds me of North Korea.
True story.Uh, hate to dispute your NK reference, but this shit is classic "sieg heil" .
Odumbass and Hildebitch are both war mongers. They armed terrorists to overthrow the legitimate government of Libya and conducted the US bombing of the legitimate government military to support the terrorists, all in the name of preventing "genocide." It wasn't really genocide, but legitimate military action against known terrorists that was the target. Unlike Bush, Obombya did it illegally without congressional approval.Where is lazy lying liberal @syskatine to refute his king Obama isn't in fact killing Americans with out due process? I thought you were so much smarter then dumb ole Johnny. I guess my domination is just to much for ole lying @syskatine and his warmonger buddy Obama.
Man is ole lazy lying liberal @syskatine drop off to a cave or something. I guess when you have her defeated she just quits talking and drops off the face of the Earth. I guess she can't admit that king Obama has faults and isn't perfect. I guess she can't really say much after all the bashing she did towards Bush who had the backing of Congress unlike Obama who just does what ever he likes. IMO Obama wins the warmonger award. But we won't be hearing from lazy lying liberal @syskatine anytime soon because I am dominating her right now!!!!