You:
![]()
Don’t fool yourself.
You are the biggest spoonfed narrative parrot on this board.
I was actually more interested in seeing the crowd. It was a microcosm of lower middle class middle America. The same people you see at Walmart, Dennys, and the VA. The same people that keep getting left behind by both parties. The same people who are the last to see higher wages. The same people who do the hard work so others can make more money instead of them. And they looked pissed. Not at Trump but at the people who get away with breaking the law while they never get a break.
Trump has tapped into them and still is.
What does that have to do with what I posted? I simply pointed out who it looks like in the crowd.I’m sure none of those MAGA-hat wearing people are on welfare and food stamps either, right?
What does that have to do with what I posted? I simply pointed out who it looks like in the crowd.
I didn't prop up anyone. Once again I simply pointed out who it looked like was in attendance.You do realize wages have stagnated under Humpty Trumpty? You do realize he’s giving tax breaks to the rich and doing nothing for the middle and lower classes, correct? You’re literally propping up someone who bragged about his apartment and wealth to blind sheep lower and middle-class supporters who think he’s there to help. Many of the same people who whine and complain about “government handouts” but take them.
Do you understand the total hypocrisy involved here? Do the optics register to you?
And what if they are? Does that discredit anything he posted? If anything, it strengthens it.I’m sure none of those MAGA-hat wearing people are on welfare and food stamps either, right?
You’re quite obsessed with trying to discredit me — key word being “discredit.”
Why do you care so much — writing long and creepy diatribes to me at 4am (the witching hour?), you’ve literally done that.
If, as you say, I’m just being “spoonfed.”
Which is of course completely untrue. You’re never going to be able to box me in or pigeonhole me on anything.
I could never get my information and perspectives from one single place or source. Who would want to, with literally millions of independent “nodes” of information, in a huge hive mind of constant activity.
I can enjoy listening to Noam Chomsky, Chris Hedges, Michael Moore or Ann Coulter / Nigel Farage — or more obscure sources and lectures.
Secondly, for all my rants about “multiculturalism” and “diversity” — I actually appreciate different cultures, and made friends from all over the world during my many years outside the US.
My contention with “multiculturalism” is that it’s actually anti-diversity — by forcibly (and unnaturally) trying to mix people and cultures together in a big salad bowl, stirred and mixed by “the elites.” (As during the Bolshevik revolution)
For example — if I go to Morocco, I want to eat authentic Moroccan food, see authentic Moroccan architecture, and experience Moroccan culture (it looks like an incredible place).
“Gloabalism” in its true and current form is going to Morocco and seeing Starbucks and KFC everywhere, and listening to 50 Cent in Moroccan night life settings.
I say all of this as an ex globalist — my Generation was sold a huge lie about globalization.
Globalization (at its heart) is anti-culture and anti-diversity — a person will learn this most truly by traveling the world and developing an appreciation for other cultures.
For example: Mexico City actually looks like an awesome city (if it was safe) — but I don’t want us to merge with Mexico.
At the end of the day though, I know it’s going to be almost impossible to stop.
bro this is thunderdome
the everybody gets a trophy empathy tent board is over there
At some point my sincere hope is that something gets through to you, whether it be through sincere generosity or a smack down.
......
There isn't much redeeming about you currently, but I'm also a believer in 2nd, 3rd, 4th chances. Maybe someday you'll focus your energies in a productive way. Maybe.
Do you have a reputable source that backs this statement up? I'm getting a very nice tax break and I'm not "rich."You do realize he’s giving tax breaks to the rich and doing nothing for the middle and lower classes, correct?
Do you have a reputable source that backs this statement up? I'm getting a very nice tax break and I'm not "rich."
He’s quoting me
Do you have a reputable source that backs this statement up? I'm getting a very nice tax break and I'm not "rich."
Looks to me that since, by your own acknowledgement, you are not rich (presumably middle class) and are receiving a "nice tax break" that this is sufficient to blow holes in the "doing nothing for the middle and lower classes" assertion. All it takes is one.Do you have a reputable source that backs this statement up? I'm getting a very nice tax break and I'm not "rich."
Those are all opinions and predictions from 2017. Is there any real world data out yet? I ask because the geniuses behind Obamacare were going to save us $2,500 year on health insurance premiums (prediction), but the real world data never demonstrated that to be true.https://www.npr.org/2017/12/19/5717...h-of-gop-tax-cuts-will-go-to-the-middle-class
https://www.forbes.com/sites/janetn...harp-kick-to-upper-middle-class/#6d78ab391099
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/16/senate-tax-plan-middle-class-165141
http://www.politifact.com/new-york/statements/2017/dec/22/kirsten-gillibrand/will-republican-tax-law-raise-middle-class-taxes/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-taxes-under-gop-bill-despite-trumps-promise/
Looks to me that since, by your own acknowledgement, you are not rich (presumably middle class) and are receiving a "nice tax break" that this is sufficient to blow holes in the "doing nothing for the middle and lower classes" assertion. All it takes is one.
Even politifact tends to agree.
Look at the growth in the wealth gap during the Obama presidency. This isn't a new issue.You do understand wages are stagnant/falling and the wealthy are controlling more wealth than ever? Yeah...assertion truly has holes blown in it lol
Look at the growth in the wealth gap during the Obama presidency. This isn't a new issue.
The Democrats had enough of a majority to pass Obamacare. Do you think that raising taxes on the top tax brackets will solve wealth inequality?And why is that? Because there wasn’t a big enough dem majority in Congress to pass a tax hike on the wealthy. Last time this actually happened? First year of Clinton administration
The Democrats had enough of a majority to pass Obamacare. Do you think that raising taxes on the top tax brackets will solve wealth inequality?
But middle-class Republicans have this strange idea that giving the rich money actually trickles down to them lol...it doesn’t.
Nope. And nope.In our American capitalism, wealth inequality is built-in. We would have to enact a significant amount of (gasp) socialism to counteract this, including capping salaries for athletes/coaches in sports, Wall Street CEOs and corporate executives.
But middle-class Republicans have this strange idea that giving the rich money actually trickles down to them lol...it doesn’t.
You do realize he’s giving tax breaks to the rich and doing nothing for the middle and lower classes, correct?
Look at the growth in the wealth gap during the Obama presidency. This isn't a new issue.
But middle-class Republicans have this strange idea that giving the rich money
In our American capitalism, wealth inequality is built-in. We would have to enact a significant amount of (gasp) socialism to counteract this, including capping salaries for athletes/coaches in sports, Wall Street CEOs and corporate executives.
But middle-class Republicans have this strange idea that giving the rich money actually trickles down to them lol...it doesn’t.
Letting people keep more of their earnings equals the gov't giving them money?
Who the hell taught you in school?
Who do you think middle class republicans work for? Homeless people?
And they looked pissed. Not at Trump but at the people who get away with breaking the law while they never get a break.