ADVERTISEMENT

Unmentionable words in Dear Leader's admin: "Science-based." "Evidence-based."

A

anon_xl72qcu5isp39

Heisman Candidate
Sep 7, 2008
11,031
4,355
113
Policy analysts at the [URL='https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2017/12/11/new-cdc-head-faces-questions-about-financial-conflicts-of-interest/?utm_term=.cb08b77bb858']Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta were told of the list of forbidden words at a meeting Thursday with senior CDC officials who oversee the budget, according to an analyst who took part in the 90-minute briefing. The forbidden words are “vulnerable,” “entitlement,” “diversity,” “transgender,” “fetus,” “evidence-based” and “science-based.”[/URL]

So this week we nominated judges that don't know what a motion in limine is and demand conformity from scientists in their vocabulary, I guess in the interest of ideology.

Example # 46,789 of modern conservatism in action. MAGA.
 
syskatine said:
Policy analysts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta were told of the list of forbidden words at a meeting Thursday with senior CDC officials who oversee the budget, according to an analyst who took part in the 90-minute briefing. The forbidden words are “vulnerable,” “entitlement,” “diversity,” “transgender,” “fetus,” “evidence-based” and “science-based.”

So this week we nominated judges that don't know what a motion in limine is and demand conformity from scientists in their vocabulary, I guess in the interest of ideology.

Example # 46,789 of modern conservatism in action. MAGA.
Click to expand...
Meh. I'll wait until there's more than just two anonymous people talking to a reporter as the evidence/proof.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton and CBradSmith
syskatine said:
You're just jealous of Dr's.
Click to expand...
Here's you some jealously.

25394709_387154915040223_1588098636259949470_o.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: NZ Poke and Medic007
syskatine said:
You're just jealous of Dr's.
Click to expand...
Lol. Yeah, that must be it.

My best friend is an ER doctor. He regrets taking on the time and debt to become one. He's been a full-time ER doc for 7 years and will be bolting to teach full-time as soon as he gets the opportunity despite the large pay cut he'll take to do it. I have zero regrets about my decision to not go to medical school.
 
Medic007 said:
Maybe you can point me to my defense of Biff?
Click to expand...

How about a year of constant whataboutism anytime someone is critical of your Dear Leader? And constantly ripping the only elected people that agree with your claimed opinions. And constantly pushing the Biff/fox narrative.
 
syskatine said:
How about a year of constant whataboutism anytime someone is critical of your Dear Leader? And constantly ripping the only elected people that agree with your claimed opinions. And constantly pushing the Biff/fox narrative.
Click to expand...
Ahhh, so none. I'm shocked. Absolutely shocked.
 
syskatine said:
LOL as you rail against anything progressive in every other thread, just like Head, Imp, Frank, etc. Indistinguishable.
Click to expand...
Ahhh, I rail against anything "progressive." Finally you're actually being honest. I do rail against "progressive" because I'm not of the "progressive" ideology and I see the "progressive" ideology as having a whole bunch in common with the religious right. I'm an old school classical liberal. But you already knew this.

I've made this point about you before, more than once, and you're finally being honest enough to acknowledge it. You're the quintessential obedient partisan. You are driven by your identity with the Democratic Party. You will follow them down any and every rabbit hole because it's who you are.

You trust your political leaders are doing exactly what they say they are and it's as effective and awesome as they say it is and you emphatically reject any notion that they aren't regardless of fact. You routinely provide example after example of this. You see Democratic leaders as nearly infallible. Your ego and ideological identity depends on them being infallible. The thought of them being wrong bothers you because you don't want to be in a position of being wrong yourself. It's almost like a faith to you like religion is to others.

You followed the direction the Democratic Party did under Obama. I didn't. Maybe this will help illustrate the ideoligical differences between you and I.

https://beingclassicallyliberal.liberty.me/classical-liberalism-vs-progressive-liberalism/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton and trapped_in_tx
If this is true, and I unfortunately believe it is, then there is absolutely no excuse for it. It is absurd to a disturbing level. I would love to hear the Trunp voters' excuses for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Been Jammin and SMemmett
Medic007 said:
Ahhh, I rail against anything "progressive." Finally you're actually being honest. I do rail against "progressive" because I'm not of the "progressive" ideology and I see the "progressive" ideology as having a whole bunch in common with the religious right. I'm an old school classical liberal. But you already knew this.

I've made this point about you before, more than once, and you're finally being honest enough to acknowledge it. You're the quintessential obedient partisan. You are driven by your identity with the Democratic Party. You will follow them down any and every rabbit hole because it's who you are.

You trust your political leaders are doing exactly what they say they are and it's as effective and awesome as they say it is and you emphatically reject any notion that they aren't regardless of fact. You routinely provide example after example of this. You see Democratic leaders as nearly infallible. Your ego and ideological identity depends on them being infallible. The thought of them being wrong bothers you because you don't want to be in a position of being wrong yourself. It's almost like a faith to you like religion is to others.

You followed the direction the Democratic Party did under Obama. I didn't. Maybe this will help illustrate the ideoligical differences between you and I.

https://beingclassicallyliberal.liberty.me/classical-liberalism-vs-progressive-liberalism/
Click to expand...


Tribalism 101
 
Looks like they also frown on the words "malaise," "statism," "slow economic growth," and "foreign policy impotencey." They've also re-allowed the use of "Islamic terrorism."
 
  • Like
Reactions: okstatefan1
cableok said:
So the WaPo tells us there is a ban on 7 words and we have to go to snopes.com to realize that is incorrect?
Click to expand...
Is there a better place to find out what’s going on in the government than what the government news agency tells us?
 
I guess a non-denial denial is enough for some on here...

“The seven words that sparked outrage are "vulnerable," "entitlement," "diversity," "transgender," "fetus," "evidence-based and "science-based." CBS News has learned that budget analysts at the CDC were told to consider avoiding those words in order to get the broadest congressional support for funding. That advice came from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).”


I mean, a Trump appointee not being completely truthful about the new direction of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention? Ya don’t say lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
CSCOTTOSUPOKES said:
I guess a non-denial denial is enough for some on here...

“The seven words that sparked outrage are "vulnerable," "entitlement," "diversity," "transgender," "fetus," "evidence-based and "science-based." CBS News has learned that budget analysts at the CDC were told to consider avoiding those words in order to get the broadest congressional support for funding. That advice came from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).”


I mean, a Trump appointee not being completely truthful about the new direction of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention? Ya don’t say lol
Click to expand...
This may be a bit nuanced for some here...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back