ADVERTISEMENT

Uh, Oh! Bernie -- kid gloves are off now...

One thing I like about Bernie is that he seems to have convictions, although he's changing his tune on guns.

Hillary is absolutely right though that he will raise taxes (significantly from what I can tell) on the middle class.

Can anyone remind me who she has stood up to or what she's done?
 
One thing I like about Bernie is that he seems to have convictions, although he's changing his tune on guns.

Hillary is absolutely right though that he will raise taxes (significantly from what I can tell) on the middle class.

Can anyone remind me who she has stood up to or what she's done?
Her ass got bigger...
 
I dare she would too, or least raise it a lot, if she got a Dem Congress.
She and the Slickster are letting their foundation pay for almost all their expenses. The taxpayers (Secret Service) are paying the mortgage on their NY home. It's quite easy to raise taxes on everyone else when one isn't faced with the same tax burdens or living expenses as the majority. I heard her say today that she'd tax Hedge Fund people. Apparently she's appropriating one of Trump's first positions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marshal Jim Duncan
You can't be a real person.... quoting a debunked chain email from 2007 in your arguments still today???? LOL....
It was stated in the MSM shortly after they bought the house in Chappaqua that the costs paid by the secret service to guard the compound was sufficient to cover the mortgage. Hillary has recently said they were dead broke when leaving the WH. The mortgage on the house was arranged by one of their enablers, I believe Terry McAuliffe, on a 5 year balloon presumably because they couldn't qualify for a mortgage given their impoverished situation. Perhaps they made enough in speaking engagements in those 5 years to satisfy the balloon and don't need the SService monies although they are still receiving such. The Clintons are masters at not paying for much out of their pockets. They are the ones who determine how they spend the money given by the taxpayers to run their offices and compound.

Here's a more recent article from a liberal blog.

Although the Clintons footed the bill for the server used in their private email address, taxpayers indirectly have footed the bill to protect the server. That’s because it’s located at the Clintons’ suburban New York home, and, as such, is guarded — along with the rest of the property — by the Secret Service.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/taxpayer-tab-for-clinton-inc-16-million-116008#ixzz3x86ThSv1
 
Last edited:
I always thought GWB was a wimp for not going after the Clinton's and the White House staffers that basically looted the White House and destroyed a lot of the computers before they left.

Is that a right wing fantasy.
 
It was stated in the MSM shortly after they bought the house in Chappaqua that the costs paid by the secret service to guard the compound was sufficient to cover the mortgage. Hillary has recently said they were dead broke when leaving the WH. The mortgage on the house was arranged by one of their enablers, I believe Terry McAuliffe, on a 5 year balloon presumably because they couldn't qualify for a mortgage given their impoverished situation. Perhaps they made enough in speaking engagements in those 5 years to satisfy the balloon and don't need the SService monies although they are still receiving such. The Clintons are masters at not paying for much out of their pockets. They are the ones who determine how they spend the money given by the taxpayers to run their offices and compound.

Here's a more recent article from a liberal blog.

Although the Clintons footed the bill for the server used in their private email address, taxpayers indirectly have footed the bill to protect the server. That’s because it’s located at the Clintons’ suburban New York home, and, as such, is guarded — along with the rest of the property — by the Secret Service.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/taxpayer-tab-for-clinton-inc-16-million-116008#ixzz3x86ThSv1
Please, you take a long route to no end with this explanation.... The original story from a tabloid rag was immediately repudiated by credible sources. That you are still repeating this some 8 years later and intermixing it with other bits - that should be embarrassing.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT