Pretty complex case. They made reasonably quick work of it giving Bragg a nice skin.
Well Sam Bankman-Fried donated to the right party, which makes destroying the lives of no telling how many people perfectly acceptible to Democrats.
Yet Biden isn't, strange considering all the very real evidence the FBI has had since 2019, don't you think?
If that's the only thing they can find that Trump's business did wrong after digging into every facet of his and his business, I'm actually pretty impressed. I would think there would be far more wrong doings in a multi million dollars business if by nothing other than just simple errors. Put anyone else through that type of scrutiny and I have a feeling many would fail miserably.
LOL Script talking point # 2: Oh, it's just paper crimes. Process crimes. Everyone does it.
Civil convictions are not the same as criminal and like i said how many of those in Washington would come out with far worse? If I were you I would wait to see what how the appeals court rules before I started celebrating.
All that for $1.6M (maximum) in fines. Like most Democratic actions, the ROI on this prosecution is once again, negative for the taxpayers. But hey, we got a fresh anti-Trump headline, so to the libs it was worth it.
Does Maxine Waters represent the Department of Justice in any manner?House Financial Services Chair Waters doesn't plan to subpoena Sam Bankman-Fried to testify at hearing on FTX collapse
House Financial Services Chair Maxine Waters tells members there are no current plans to subpoena FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried for his testimony.www.cnbc.com
Per CNBC (an approved liberal source I thought), Dem finance chair, Maxine Waters, will NOT subpoena him.
Carry on.
No. But she manages the Financial Services committee and has demonstrated that she has no problem subpoenaing Republicans who've done a hell of a lot less than steal 10 Billion. Just ask Trump.
