Trump considering Mitt Romney for Secretary of State
- Thread starter NZ Poke
- Start date
Agree NZ, this would be a really poor choice in my opinion, at least for SofS. Course not as poor as The Hildabeast though.
He should put the guy in charge of reforming the VA though. He would excel there.
He should put the guy in charge of reforming the VA though. He would excel there.
The State Department is full of a bunch of snakes. They'd run all over Romney.
This pick would signal to me that we will continue to feed war profiteers and send our men and women to their deaths. Bullshit pick
Hope not. Staying optimistic.
Here's an interesting post, from Sundance --- someone who has been consistently accurate for the last year.
Also suggest reading the comments --- the comments section on CTH is some of the best analysis anywhere.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/11/23/neverromney-is-there-an-intended-audience/
Also suggest reading the comments --- the comments section on CTH is some of the best analysis anywhere.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/11/23/neverromney-is-there-an-intended-audience/
]
Fantastic read and comments. I was hoping he was just squeezing Romney for an apology but if it's all about finalizing the destruction of the GOP establishment, it is boss level strategy.
Breitbart poll? Thats some like Pravda doing a poll on Stalin.
Speaking of which, with Bannon employed where he is now. Isn't it safe to say that Breitbart is now the American Pravda. 100% pro Trump propaganda straight from the White house.
Speaking of which, with Bannon employed where he is now. Isn't it safe to say that Breitbart is now the American Pravda. 100% pro Trump propaganda straight from the White house.
Or George Robert Stephanopoulos working as one of the lead news sources for ABC? Or Donna Brazile working for CNN? Now remind me, don't they have deep connections to the Clintons?
But I'm guessing you're not going to second guess the objectivity of those organizations are you?
(Didn't Brazile feed Hillary debate questions before the debates?) Nothing to see here folks, let's demonize Breitbart.
Or let's recognize that none of them are objective.
Seems the more rational thing to do.
I think objectivity and rationality left the political discussion arena with Elvis, but he played both sides well:
I remember you telling me something equally dismissive about Bill Mitchell. "He is an anti-poll and anti-math loon. His tweets read like a parody account."
He kinda nailed it in retrospect. Agree?
Call it propaganda if you want. A lot of those guys were and continue to be accurate and ahead of the MSM curve.
