Most likely will result in a hellish dystopia. Can't go from a system where everyone depends on their jobs or money and sustenance to a system where no labor is required and everyone has happily abundant lives without vast redistribution of capital.
Serious w/ some condescension but no sarcasm this time.Never can tell whether you're serious or just being your normal sarcastic/condescending self.
Never can tell whether you're serious or just being your normal sarcastic/condescending self.
I think it's both a legit response and he's being a dick.I agree. That said, since there's really no framework from which to launch irony, I chose to assume he's responding in a legit manner. His statements are certainly plausible if not likely.
Then again, maybe he's being a dick.
Most likely will result in a hellish dystopia. Can't go from a system where everyone depends on their jobs or money and sustenance to a system where no labor is required and everyone has happily abundant lives without vast redistribution of capital.
Most likely will result in a hellish dystopia. Can't go from a system where everyone depends on their jobs or money and sustenance to a system where no labor is required and everyone has happily abundant lives without vast redistribution of capital.
The type of world being speculated about requires resource abundance, so something like peak oil or an environmental catastrophe or war could prevent the transition to a laborless economy.Any additional thoughts?
Anybody else?
1. Is the problem likely real?
2. How will government handle the problem of increasing unemployment if so?
3. Do the solutions create new problems?