THIS is conservative government in the U.S.
- Thread starter Syskatine
- Start date
They pee down your leg with such consistency, and you all just keep going along. And that is how you consolidate power - have a base that will follow the piper on meaningless cultural s*** and let the deficit grab a higher gear. Trannies! Fags! Guns! Caravans! More fags! MS13!
Born followers.
Born followers.
Read that article.
I will even bet the Tulsa Congressman that voted for that insane budget was reelected with healthy numbers. Glove, Mega, all of our Tulsa crew marched down and voted for him and that deficit. And they will next time, too.
And the dem would have voted to cut spending?
I’m confused as to who you are arguing with.
Both sides are spending us into oblivion. One side is like you. One side isn’t.
What part of this equation is short circuiting your brain?
Both sides are spending us into oblivion. One side is like you. One side isn’t.
What part of this equation is short circuiting your brain?
Excuses and whataboutism. That ain't rain on your leg. But you'll call it rain because it's your team.
I'm confused. No outrage? No accountability? I'll bet you still voted Republican too. Did you?
So, no. They wouldn’t have voted against it. Then quit using it as a reason we shouldn’t vote republican.
The Tulsa Congressman did not seek re-election. So, I guess you lose that bet.
The spending IS out of control. Tax receipts set another record. Up 4.7% in October vs October 2017.
Third post in this thread is my outrage.
Who should I vote for to get spending under control? Just point me in the right direction.
Until then you are damn right I’m voting republican because I would rather be in debt and not have fascist word police race baiting socialist liberals running the country than be in debt and have to live under that shit.
Again, who are we supposed to vote for? What solutions to debt are the libs offering?
One obvious solution is a significant defense spending cut (gasp). That’s part of how Clinton achieved a balanced budget. He also raised the top income tax bracket.
No. Dems don't explode deficits like this. The huge deficits in Obama's era were started with the recession spending and the deficit didn't grow ape shit like it is now. It grew like crazy with Dumbya. Clinton had a SURPLUS.
That's not rain on your legs, gentlemen.
"Deficits don't matter." - Dick Cheney
No, you're not outraged. Your punctuation betrays you. You haven't even employed a single exclamation mark. (!!)
Well I'd probably take the party that tends not to run up huge deficits and avoid the party that does. I'd avoid the party that openly stated deficits don't matter, and used a republican president as an example of that. I would vote for the party that had a surplus, and not the party that consistently runs up huge deficits. THat's the easiest question this side of "Would you please state your name?"
"Fascist word police race baiting socialist liberals" This is the feeble minded shit I'm talking about. Pure messaging. You heard that over and over and over from people that are paid to say that.
When's the last time you've dealt with a "fascist world police race baiting socialist liberal" in your life?
That's not rain on your legs, gentlemen.
"Deficits don't matter." - Dick Cheney
No, you're not outraged. Your punctuation betrays you. You haven't even employed a single exclamation mark. (!!)
Well I'd probably take the party that tends not to run up huge deficits and avoid the party that does. I'd avoid the party that openly stated deficits don't matter, and used a republican president as an example of that. I would vote for the party that had a surplus, and not the party that consistently runs up huge deficits. THat's the easiest question this side of "Would you please state your name?"
"Fascist word police race baiting socialist liberals" This is the feeble minded shit I'm talking about. Pure messaging. You heard that over and over and over from people that are paid to say that.
When's the last time you've dealt with a "fascist world police race baiting socialist liberal" in your life?
Like you give a shit about the deficit or the things that cause it.
Just something else to reliably bitch about like a good bot.
Too many breaks. You’ll have to one post one question for me.
Republicans are idiots on defense spending but so are most Dems. All politicians love having DoD contractors in their districts. It’s great for cotes.
For as bad as Rs (and most Ds) are on defense spending, Ds are are 100x worse on all other kinds of spending.
Until the house flipped, I thought the next shoe to fall would be cutting government spending. Step 1 cut taxes. Step 2 Cut spending.
It's easier to cut taxes than spending because everyone wants a tax cut but few want their "free" entitlements done away with. Spending is power and politicians aren't going to give up on that.
It's easier to cut taxes than spending because everyone wants a tax cut but few want their "free" entitlements done away with. Spending is power and politicians aren't going to give up on that.
This thread will have some validity when the newly Democratic House actually passes a budget with less spending.
The party that demonized the sequester you mean? The sequester which led to greatly reduced deficits during the tail end of the Ivana administration. The Obama administration whips healthcare plan and other entitlement spending is a driver to a great degree of theccurrent deficits.
Neither party has the will to rein in the budget to a sufficient degree. The first person who presents a legitimate plan to do so will be demonized.
Sooooo...if Dems proposed a budget decreasing spending, including defense, and republicans quickly said no in senate...
You’ll become a Democrat?
Clinton didn’t achieve anything on his own. It’s not a dictatorship. Congress has a role in this as well.
We wouldn't need to be spending like this on defense if the last administration had supported the military branch.
Links to lack of support? You do realize how fvcking stupid you sound lol...not that it’s anything new.
NO. But I'd give them credit for passing a budget that reduces spending. IF of course it actually did reduce spending and not simply reduce the rate of growth.
Is this conservative or liberal fiscal policy? @Syskatine help me identify please.
https://www.foxnews.com/tech/cuomo-...ntive-laden-deal-to-bring-amazon-to-big-apple
https://www.foxnews.com/tech/cuomo-...ntive-laden-deal-to-bring-amazon-to-big-apple
F’ing (insert party here) doesn’t support our troops.
F’ing (insert party here) wastes too much money on defense spending.
Both parties deserve a shitload of criticism for military spending post 9/11 where we threw our underfunded troops into two wars and had to play catch up while the casualty count went up while at the same time spending like idiots on big boondoggle projects like the F-35....but since both sides share blame, they’ll both remain silent.
Fun fact: there’s several friendly fire deaths that were directly caused by the Air Force using a B-1 bomber in a close air support mission because they got caught up chasing F-35 procurement and didn’t have anything else available to support the mission. Cheaper alternatives exist but they don’t entail large scale job creation programs across multiple congressional districts or “consulting” jobs for retired generals.
Wharry, you'll stay on point or else I'm stopping in Perkins tonight and slapping your little slut mouth. We're not talking about Amazon business incentives.
How many consecutive republican administrations have ran up bigass deficits? Answer that question.
Here's the rub: They know you -- their base -- will "SQUIRRELL!!" at every trannie and vignette about Fairleigh U's assistant philosoophy professor. Right wing media has literally defined yoru world view and even the obvious self-contradictory components of it don't change your cult loyalty.
