ADVERTISEMENT

They’re going nuts over this

NZ Poke

Heisman Candidate
Dec 16, 2007
6,088
7,047
113








DmS7eOVUcAAvBnh
 
Not going crazy, just want the information declassified.


Reminder: James Clapper already threw Obama under the bus





Related: Lisa Page (who is now talking) text message to Peter Strzok.


c3yxz9xsuqr01.jpg




Source re Lisa Page text:

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...us-wants-to-know-everything-were-doing-report



Also, page 89 of the DOJ Inspector General Report says Obama knowingly communicated on Hillary’s secret server using a pseudonym.

Wonder what they were commmunicating about?



Dlvl6ZVVsAAJjsZ




FC5_A27_A6_5_D04_487_B_A6_C6_2_AF663_A6_CE9_C.jpg


Source (scroll to page 89):

https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
that ship sailed

And your willing march to authoritarianism continues.

Don’t trust any of them to be truthful.

Declassify the world.

Let light shine on the entirety of the whole thing. It’s a great disinfectant.

Prove that this has never been about a search for truth.....by putting everything on the table.
 
And your willing march to authoritarianism continues.

Don’t trust any of them to be truthful.

Declassify the world.

Let light shine on the entirety of the whole thing. It’s a great disinfectant.

Prove that this has never been about a search for truth.....by putting everything on the table.

Problem is, there's virtually no chance of that happening.
 
What?!

This literally happened 2016 with the Wikileaks release of DNC emails and Podesta emails.


The emails are a monumentally vast treasure trove of detailed information, barely studied and rarely talked about, documenting (in their own words) how our political elites and media elites operate.


Those emails (there are so many) could be studied and analyzed for decades — they are completely incriminating and utterly mind blowing.


You’ll never get new information about the emails from the corporate media, as the corporate media was badly exposed by them. Many of the people are still working in the industry.

No book publisher would dare to publish about them.

No university student or professor would ever get a grant to study and write about them.

But the emails are out there. Once you spend any time studying them, you’ll never forget what you read — no matter how loudly people cry “Russia.”

Re-read JD's post then re-read mine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CowboyJD
Quote of the week given the "anonymous" Op-ed in the NYT yesterday.

I think the author of that Op-ed is a cretinous coward.

He’s exhibiting loyalty to Trump over loyalty to country by what s/he did in the past and is now hedging his/her bets by not disclosing this in an open manner, on the record, so it can be dealt with.
 
What?!

This literally happened 2016 with the Wikileaks release of DNC emails and Podesta emails.


The emails are a monumentally vast treasure trove of detailed information, barely studied and rarely talked about, documenting (in their own words) how our political elites and media elites operate.


Those emails (there are so many) could be studied and analyzed for decades — they are completely incriminating and utterly mind blowing.


You’ll never get new information about the emails from the corporate media, as the corporate media was badly exposed by them. Many of the people are still working in the industry.

No book publisher would dare to publish about them.

No university student or professor would ever get a grant to study and write about them.

But the emails are out there. Once you spend any time studying them, you’ll never forget what you read — no matter how loudly people cry “Russia.”

Wow....your handlers have really put you in a comfy box of nobody but them being able to tell you what it all means.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pokeabear
I think the author of that Op-ed is a cretinous coward.

He’s exhibiting loyalty to Trump over loyalty to country by what s/he did in the past and is now hedging his/her bets by not disclosing this in an open manner, on the record, so it can be dealt with.

maybe they’re cretinous cowards because the wrote a bunch of bs???
 
Nope, no “handlers.” This is 100% me. And yet again, you can’t resist the personal attack.

One of the main reasons Trump’s support has remained utterly rock solid — no matter what the corporate media says, and no matter how loudly politicians and celebrities scream “Russia” — is the devastating content (words) of those emails, and what they revealed.

You can’t forget what you read, ever. And the exposed figures extend far beyond the DNC and Podesta.

In the summer and fall of 2016, the emails were rapidly distributed across social media, outside the corporate media and online gatekeepers.

Many millions of people read them before the establishment could react, or attempt to stop it. It all happened incredibly quickly.

What the emails revealed about those elites, was utterly devastating, scary, infuriating and sad. It ultimately won Trump the election, took him over the edge.

This is why the “elites” have been obsessed with social media censorship, search engine result manipulation and “unpersoning” since the 2016 election.

Online has been (and is currently) the number one political battleground.

Boomers watching Fox News had nothing to do with Donald Trump winning the 2016 election.

PS, the Wikileaks emails also revealed fascinating stuff about entertainment industry. I couldn’t care less about the entertainment industry until I read the emails.

That’s the only reason I started researching them, a Podesta email about “spirit cooking.” Down the rabbit hole I went, along with many millions of others.

Personal attack?

What a little snowflake you are.

Nope, it was just a comment on your statement that only you and the memes and handlers you incessantly repost here have the real scoop and no one else will be willing or able to reveal the “truth”.
 
Nope, no “handlers.” This is 100% me. And yet again, you can’t resist the personal attack.

One of the main reasons Trump’s support has remained utterly rock solid — no matter what the corporate media says, and no matter how loudly politicians and celebrities scream “Russia” — is the devastating content (words) of those emails, and what they revealed.

You can’t forget what you read, ever. And the exposed figures extend far beyond the DNC and Podesta.

In the summer and fall of 2016, the emails were rapidly distributed across social media, outside the corporate media and online gatekeepers.

Many millions of people read them before the establishment could react, or attempt to stop it. It all happened incredibly quickly.

What the emails revealed about those elites, was utterly devastating, scary, infuriating and sad. It ultimately won Trump the election, took him over the edge.

This is why the “elites” have been obsessed with social media censorship, search engine result manipulation and “unpersoning” since the 2016 election.

Online has been (and is currently) the number one political battleground.

Boomers watching Fox News had nothing to do with Donald Trump winning the 2016 election.

PS, the Wikileaks emails also revealed fascinating stuff about entertainment industry. I couldn’t care less about the entertainment industry until I read the emails.

That’s the only reason I started researching them, a Podesta email about “spirit cooking.” Down the rabbit hole I went, along with many millions of others.
I see why you constantly use memes. Keep using those. This "100% me" post caused me to fall asleep during an important department meeting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CowboyJD
I see why you constantly use memes. Keep using those. This "100% me" post caused me to fall asleep during an important department meeting.

He’s supposedly “too busy” to actually make his own arguments without the memes and reposts.

Yet he also supposedly researched these millions of e-mails himself rather than being told what is in them and what that means.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
I think the author of that Op-ed is a cretinous coward.

He’s exhibiting loyalty to Trump over loyalty to country by what s/he did in the past and is now hedging his/her bets by not disclosing this in an open manner, on the record, so it can be dealt with.

I would agree with this with one issue. It presumes that the op-ed is fully factual. Given its anonymous nature, I'm inclined to believe that its heavily embellished, and that many of the 'country saving activities' were likely routine, bureaucratic functions fluffed up to a greater import.

Its actually funny. When this came out, I watched Rachel Maddow talk about it. And her statement was that this was someone pulling the fire alarm and that we needed to pay attention to it. Unfortunately, she clearly never heard the parable of the boy who cried wolf. I've listened to the media stammer every day about how terrible Trump is, and frankly what I've seen is Washington operating as normal. Economy is humming, trade negotiations are on-going, etc. So everyday, Dems scream about the "fire alarm" going off, so when a new unverifiable alarm rings, this time by an anonymous author published by the clearly left-leaning NYTimes, why should I suddenly pay attention to it?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT