The Truth About Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

[NZ Poke]

If you want to get smarter (and more awake), watch this.




“Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals” was written by community organizer Saul Alinsky in 1971. It has become the de facto progressive manifesto for effecting political change.

Opening: “What follows is for those who want to change the world from what it is to what they believe it should be. The Prince was written by Machiavelli for the Haves on how to hold power. Rules for Radicals is written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away.”

Democratic Presidential Nominee Hillary Clinton met with Saul Alinsky several times in 1968 while she was writing her college thesis on his community organization theories. President Barack Obama’s education was also greatly influenced by Alinsky and his theories.

What is The Truth About Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals – and how does it work?

 

[squeak]

I haven't watched, but what pops out at me is that those two - the haves (globalists/Soros/Wall Street) and the have-nots (Alinsky) - appear to be mutually exclusive; however, Hillary is often portrayed as both. She has to be one or the other!

Maybe there is a third option. Maybe she is a selfish whore with no convictions who will do anything for power.

 

[NZ Poke]

I think it's the last of the three.

 

[Marshal Jim Duncan]

I haven't watched, but what pops out at me is that those two - the haves (globalists/Soros/Wall Street) and the have-nots (Alinsky) - appear to be mutually exclusive; however, Hillary is often portrayed as both. She has to be one or the other!

Maybe there is a third option. Maybe she is a selfish whore with no convictions who will do anything for power.

She is a selfish, loathsome person who came from a position of relative comfort, but desired, or felt entitled to, a position of great power and influence. She uses and manipulates the wants and desires of the "have-nots" by portraying common cause and empathy with them in order to attain her own personal goals. She may, in fact, have common cause and empathy for at least some of the want/desires/goals of the "have-nots", but those goals must always be subservient to her own personal goals and discarded in favor of her own personal goals/agenda when expediency calls for it.

 

[Headhunter]

Why don't all these social justice idiots ask themselves why all their benifactors and political champions are all super wealthy and powerful?

They are being used as useful idiots to enrich and give power to their masters but being idiots they don't realize it.

 

[GunsOfFrankEaton]

Why don't all these social justice idiots ask themselves why all their benifactors and political champions are all super wealthy and powerful?

They are being used as useful idiots to enrich and give power to their masters but being idiots they don't realize it.

Exactly. These left wing idiots absolutely hate the Walmart corporation, but seem to have no problem whatsoever with the fact that the Walmart Foundation has contributed millions to the Clinton Foundation.

 

[NZ Poke]

See bottom paragraph.

 

[imprimis]

Obama and Valerie Jarrett have a lifelong love affair with Communism. Jarrett probably more so than Obama. They all come from the Chicago wing of the Communist Party as did Alinsky.