Don't give them your blood or money.
Fvck you and fvck the Red Cresc...er, Cross.Yeah, by all means, stop donating blood for Americans across the US who desperately need blood, plasma, and platelets for life-saving procedures.
If you do actually donate, at least give to Oklahoma Blood Institute or a nearby donation center.
Jesus, some of the goofy crap you hillbillies post is just mind-numbing at times.
Yeah, by all means, stop donating blood for Americans across the US who desperately need blood, plasma, and platelets for life-saving procedures.
If you do actually donate, at least give to Oklahoma Blood Institute or a nearby donation center.
Jesus, some of the goofy crap you hillbillies post is just mind-numbing at times.
You're not going to achieve a revolution by taking a knee at a God damned football game or looting baby formula from a Target. How did all those peaceful protests work out for MLK? You want real revolution? You have to get dirty.
You have to kill cops. I said it. For every dead black man at a traffic stop, two dead cops.
Offended by? The Red Cross is supposedly neutral in situations like this and is there to help everyone. The allegation they are not should be taken seriously for no other reason than to protect it's reputation. If it's found to be BS the people need to know, just as if they are not the people need to know.What a creepy little snowflake remark made by someone going out of his way to find something to get offended by, followed by a brain-dead typical snowflake reaction. One person makes one unverified claim about what one Red Cross worker said, so of course the correct thing to do is vilify the whole institution and urge people to cause it harm. I mean this is obvious proof that is how the Red Cross trains its people to behave, right? Clearly the Red Cross exists to say hurtful things to people to whom they are bringing succor.
The allegation is that one person was not neutral, and this yokel want to disparage the entire institution and bring it to its knees. I call that overzealous wokery.Offended by? The Red Cross is supposedly neutral in situations like this and is there to help everyone. The allegation they are not should be taken seriously for no other reason than to protect it's reputation. If it's found to be BS the people need to know, just as if they are not the people need to know.
The Red Cross has been a great organization in it's history. The world needs the Red Cross to remain true to it's neutrality and not allowed to become biased. Sadly leftist have infiltrated most everything with their scourge, we can't allow it to destroy a humanitarian organization like the Red Cross.
Maybe but it needs to be investigated and if true correct, do you not agree?The allegation is that one person was not neutral, and this yokel want to disparage the entire institution and bring it to its knees. I call that overzealous wokery.
Sure, and if it’s true the thoughtless soulless person responsible needs to be shown the door. But it is almost as thoughtless for one to rile himself up in indignation against the entire enterprise because of what one person did.Maybe but it needs to be investigated and if true correct, do you not agree?
Sleepy says "what?". 😉They denied my father care in Vietnam.
They’ll never get a drop or dime from our house.
They’ve never been neutral.
If it were not for double standards Democrats would have none.I would guess the red cross is full of liberal ideolog's like most of similar organizations. I'm curious though if it was the western version of the red cross or the red crescent?
It's like everything liberal though, remember when libs raised hell that churches should lose their tax exempt status if speakers invoke political speechifying? Yet, when the idiot Biden, you know the guy who started the civil rights movement & attended the AME church where he lived more than any black or white person he knew, speechified, libs have no problem with his actions.