ADVERTISEMENT

The Mueller Investigation

Been Jammin

Moderator
Moderator
Jun 27, 2003
62,472
47,599
113
Updated at 5:15 p.m. ET on October 30, 2018.

A company that appears to be run by a pro-Trump conspiracy theorist offered to pay women to make false claims against Special Counsel Robert Mueller in the days leading up to the midterm elections—and the special counsel’s office has asked the FBI to weigh in. “When we learned last week of allegations that women were offered money to make false claims about the Special Counsel, we immediately referred the matter to the FBI for investigation,” the Mueller spokesman Peter Carr told me in an email on Tuesday.

The special-counsel office’s attention to this scheme and its decision to release a rare statement about it indicates the seriousness with which the team is taking the purported plot to discredit Mueller in the middle of an ongoing investigation. Carr confirmed that the allegations were brought to the office’s attention by several journalists, who were contacted by a woman who identified herself as Lorraine Parsons. Another woman, Jennifer Taub, contacted Mueller's office earlier this month with similar information.

Read: The partisan, nihilist case against Robert Mueller

The woman identifying herself as Parsons told journalists in an email, a copy of which I obtained, that she had been offered roughly $20,000 by a man claiming to work for a firm called Surefire Intelligence—which had been hired by a GOP activist named Jack Burkman—“to make accusations of sexual misconduct and workplace harassment against Robert Mueller.”

  • Parsons wrote in her letter that she had worked for Mueller as a paralegal at the Pillsbury, Madison, and Sutro law firm in 1974, but that she “didn’t see” him much. “When I did see him, he was always very polite to me, and was never inappropriate,” she said. The law firm told me late on Tuesday afternoon, however, that it has “no record of this individual working for our firm.”

Parsons explained that she was contacted by a man “with a British accent” who wanted to ask her “a couple questions about Robert Mueller, whom I worked with when I was a paralegal for Pillsbury, Madison, and Sutro in 1974. I asked him who he was working for, and he told me his boss was some sort of politics guy in Washington named Jack Burkman. I reluctantly told [him] that I had only worked with Mr. Mueller for a short period of time, before leaving that firm to have my first son.”

She continued: “In more of an effort to get him to go away than anything else, I asked him what in the hell he wanted me to do. He said that we could not talk about it on the phone, and he asked me to download an app on my phone called Signal, which he said was more secure. Reluctantly, I downloaded the app and he called me on that app a few minutes later. He said (and I will never forget exactly what it was) ‘I want you to make accusations of sexual misconduct and workplace harassment against Robert Mueller, and I want you to sign a sworn affidavit to that effect.’” The man “offered to pay off all of my credit card debt, plus bring me a check for $20,000 if I would do” it, she wrote. “He knew exactly how much credit card debt I had, right down to the dollar, which sort of freaked me out.”

Surefire Intelligence was incorporated in Delaware less than three weeks ago, according to online records, and describes itself as “a private intel agency that designs and executes bespoke solutions for businesses and individuals who face complex business and litigation challenges.” Surefire’s domain records list an email for another pro-Trump conspiracy theorist, Jacob Wohl, who began hyping a “scandalous” Mueller story on Tuesday morning. Wohl told The Daily Beast that Burkman had hired Surefire to assist with his investigation into Mueller’s past, but denied knowing anything about the firm’s involvement in an alleged plot to fabricate allegations against Mueller when asked why his email address appeared in the domain records. He did not respond when asked by NBC why a telephone number listed on Surefire’s website referred callers to another number that’s listed in public records as belonging to Wohl’s mother.

Conor Friedersdorf: The bad faith of a right-wing sting operation

Parsons was not willing to speak to the reporters by phone, according to Scott Stedman, one of the reporters who received the letter. So portions of her story have gone uncorroborated, and her identity has not been independently confirmed.

released a video on his Facebook page claiming, without evidence, that Mueller “has a whole lifetime history of harassing women.” On Tuesday, the day the special counsel’s office revealed that it had referred Parsons’s claims to the FBI, Burkman tweeted a similar allegation.

In an emailed statement, Burkman denied knowing Parsons and called the FBI referral “a joke, mueller wants to deflect attention from his sex assault troubles by attacking me.” He added in a separate email that “on Thursday 1200 NOON ROSSYLN HOLIDAY INN we will present a very credible witness who will allege that Mr. Mueller committed against her a sexual assault.” Mueller’s spokesman reiterated that the claims are false.

Burkman, a conservative radio host, is known for spreading conspiracy theories. He launched his own private investigation into the murder of the Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich, dangled uncorroborated claims of sexual harassment against a sitting member of Congress, and earlier this year offered $25,000 to FBI whistle-blowers for any information exposing wrongdoing during the 2016 election. He also promoted legislation that he authored—despite not being a member of Congress—that would ban gays from playing in the NFL. And he’s hosted two fund-raisers for Rick Gates—the former Trump-campaign official who was indicted by Mueller late last year.
 
very avennetti like, this smear job has more loose ends than a saudi hit squad
 
LOL they will try anything -- say anything - do anything to prevent this investigation from going forward. It's so clumsy it's comical.

That said, they know their feeble minded sheep and MAGA will still go with the set up even if they know it's false. I can't imagine having such a gullible, ignorant base to leverage. Hell there's two virtually identical threads about the caravan right now -- one from last April. They literally can dust off the same "scandals" that fizzle out the first time and recycle them a second time.

This may still have legs - some of the incel loosers on this board will be posting it. Watch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pokeabear
  • Like
Reactions: Syskatine
6a00d8341c730253ef01901edc0c1b970b.jpg
 
Don't know why asking about Russians gets me called a sheep.

There's no such animal as "the Mueller Investigation", it's the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election.

This, very recently, was one of the largest threats to our way of life here in the USA. We've got another election next week and I'd like to know if we're going to be able to conduct fair elections.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DildoShwaggins
LOL they will try anything -- say anything - do anything to prevent this investigation from going forward. It's so clumsy it's comical.

That said, they know their feeble minded sheep and MAGA will still go with the set up even if they know it's false. I can't imagine having such a gullible, ignorant base to leverage. Hell there's two virtually identical threads about the caravan right now -- one from last April. They literally can dust off the same "scandals" that fizzle out the first time and recycle them a second time.

This may still have legs - some of the incel loosers on this board will be posting it. Watch.


it’s great to see the snowpuffs matriculate from the screaming crocheted vagina hat to serious political theorists

try anything to stop this investigation?

jeezus
 
it’s great to see the snowpuffs matriculate from the screaming crocheted vagina hat to serious political theorists

try anything to stop this investigation?

jeezus

What do you think of Republicans withholding documents and interrupting testimony of witnesses?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Syskatine
LOL they will try anything -- say anything - do anything to prevent this investigation from going forward. It's so clumsy it's comical.

That said, they know their feeble minded sheep and MAGA will still go with the set up even if they know it's false. I can't imagine having such a gullible, ignorant base to leverage. Hell there's two virtually identical threads about the caravan right now -- one from last April. They literally can dust off the same "scandals" that fizzle out the first time and recycle them a second time.

This may still have legs - some of the incel loosers on this board will be posting it. Watch.

I have questions, and a statement.

Who, specifically, at this point is trying to prevent this investigation?

How can you tell if it's going anywhere, let alone forward?

How Can you possibly not recognize the fantasy world that the resistance lives in and still have the lack of self awareness to accuse literally any other group of humans of being notably gullible and ignorant?

Did you have a similar reaction the obvious lies and clumsy 11th hour smear tactics used against Brett Kavenaugh?

dummy-gif-7.gif
 
That's sheep-talk. You've lost interest in possible Russian meddling because your masters aren't issuing daily talking points about it anymore.

I

Interesting phrases...

“Your masters”...as if I support the supposed leader of the free world. Don’t be that guy who kisses trump’s ass and doesn’t call him “master” lol. You’re just showing off the Pom poms on your knees then

“Daily talking points”...such as “Hillary this and that” or “obama this and that” or “liberals are disgusting pieces of shit/trash” lol.


Interesting phrases lol


Carry on
 
So please correct any misunderstanding I might have here:

So an unverified report is saying that an independent American who supports Trump and the GOP but has no official ties has allegedly paid women to make false claims of harassment against Mueller? That is the story correct?

Please tell me again where Trump and or the GOP actually did something inappropriate here.
 
So please correct any misunderstanding I might have here:

So an unverified report is saying that an independent American who supports Trump and the GOP but has no official ties has allegedly paid women to make false claims of harassment against Mueller? That is the story correct?

Please tell me again where Trump and or the GOP actually did something inappropriate here.

Do you think Trump’s attacks on Mueller on Twitter perhaps have been potential firestarters for zealots? Is that too far-fetched for ya?
 
So please correct any misunderstanding I might have here:

So an unverified report is saying that an independent American who supports Trump and the GOP but has no official ties has allegedly paid women to make false claims of harassment against Mueller? That is the story correct?

Please tell me again where Trump and or the GOP actually did something inappropriate here.

this would require pragmatic thought beyond the emotional snowpuff bed wetting
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
Do you think Trump’s attacks on Mueller on Twitter perhaps have been potential firestarters for zealots? Is that too far-fetched for ya?
I don't know. Do you think Eric holders statements invite violence from the left? How about Susan Rice's? Or Soros? Does this mean I can attribute to Obama every riot and the millions of dollars in property damage inflicted by BLM? That seems like a very dangerous and slippery susposition to me.
 
So you equate national media like the Atlantic as equal to morons on a message board? Good to know.

Can I accurately equate national media like Breitbart, etc. as equal to the Atlantic?

Can I accurately equate our own President’s statements and claims about the “violent left” to the Atlantic?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Been Jammin
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT