It would
It would be more appropriate, CSCOTT, if you would read the link before commenting. The article says very little about the truth or untruth of climate change. The article shows the way science can be perverted and become something that is the opposite of science, and it uses "climate science" as an example.
The problem I encounter with you is that so often you seem to assume you know what someone is saying without bothering to listen. You jump to a conclusion that is contrary to the purpose of the post and manage to pervert it into something else. You have managed to turn this post into a typical competition to see who can offer up the greatest insult. It becomes so tiresome. Frankly I am amazed that you don't get sick of it. I often wonder how much longer you can keep it up.
I wish you would have bothered to read the article. I recognize that you are more intelligent than you seem to want people on this board to know. I think you could have made a meaningful comment or two, something that would have actually have contributed positively. It baffles me that you enjoy such juvenile behavior.