says Assange. Again putting his 100% record on the line.
If it were proven to be Russia after this, his reputation would be dead.
If it were proven to be Russia after this, his reputation would be dead.
Still wasn't Russia,
- Thread starter MegaPoke
- Start date
Just think about this - purposely attempting to damage relations with a sketchy nuclear power to distract voters from the unaltered facts and corruption revealed in those emails.
And again Hillary won the mythical popular vote - which is inconsistent with the "Russia affected the outcome of the election" narrative.
Still waiting for someone to explain how both are true.
And again Hillary won the mythical popular vote - which is inconsistent with the "Russia affected the outcome of the election" narrative.
Still waiting for someone to explain how both are true.
Give Hildebitch and her supporters a participation trophy; yell "scoreboard" and move on.
For the record, Assange is saying specifically his source wasn't Russia or any state actor. Whether that was a direct source or there was an insulated unknown third party was not made clear.
Either way, This is funny.
Either way, This is funny.
Said a 14yr old could have phished Podesta's email....hahahaha. Bunch of losers!
And so it goes with even Trump acknowledging...
Just down the street, you want me to pass Assange a note that you are done with him now?
This whole line of thinking may sound good in the echo chamber of this board (and your own head) but makes absolutely no sense. Do better. We believe in you...
So the Russian hack only aided in the voting decisions in states like for PA, MI, NC, WI, FL?
David....you have your own echo chamber with you, says, UP and pilt.
If they did indeed hack the election can we also assume that the POS Clintons vote total in the PV is bogus as well? Or was ever hack 100% advantageous for Trump and 100% disadvantageous for the POS Clinton?
I concede the hack, if you'll concede the emails messages were in and of themselves an attempt to manipulate the election and disgusting for the content regarding minorities and people in general!
If they did indeed hack the election can we also assume that the POS Clintons vote total in the PV is bogus as well? Or was ever hack 100% advantageous for Trump and 100% disadvantageous for the POS Clinton?
I concede the hack, if you'll concede the emails messages were in and of themselves an attempt to manipulate the election and disgusting for the content regarding minorities and people in general!
No need to concede the truth. Clinton was a shitty candidate. DNC was/is a freaking joke.
