ADVERTISEMENT

Spy Day at Kremlin West

CowboyUp

MegaPoke is insane
Gold Member
May 29, 2001
26,087
6,722
113
Austin Tx
imrs.php


C_eXPgqXgAAlT2R.jpg

Get a room, Comrades!!!
 
Last edited:
Uranium-one


$145 million


Clinton Foundation

334.gif
Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion’s share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company’s founder. But Giustra sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state.
 
Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion’s share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company’s founder. But Giustra sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state.

giphy-downsized-large.gif
 
Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion’s share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company’s founder. But Giustra sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state.
Sounds similar to Dick Cheney's former employer. He didn't work there anymore, but HALLIBURTON !!!!!
 
They have both made a mockery of our national sovereignty, and instead of calling them both to task over it we're going to argue over who was worse or first or more hypocritical?

Wait a second, you want serious replies to OP's drivel above?

soup-nazi.gif
 
Oh yeah, you think that means he had no connections. Funny how his name just keeps popping up next to Uranium One. You know, like Cinton's 2010 Moscow speech.
Yes it keeps popping up because he founded Uranium One. . . but he sold it in 2007. Timeline:

2005 Guistra gives $30 million to Clinton Foundation
2007 Guistra liquidates his stake in Uranium One
2008 Guistra give $100 million to Clinton Foundation
2009 Uranium One begins selling off to a Russian Company
 
Yup, nothing to see here. The Clintons aren't like historic level dirty. Nope.

article-2525602-1A2B2A3600000578-553_634x408.jpg


In 2010, Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank, paid Bill Clinton $500,000 to deliver a speech, according to Hillary Clinton’s 2010 financial disclosure form.

Some critics of the Clintons have suggested this speaking fee might have been an attempt by Renaissance Capital to curry favor with the State Department, which was involved in the Uranium One deal at the time.

But it’s important to keep in mind that Bill Clinton regularly delivers speechesfor fees of $500,000 or higher — such as a $750,000 speech in Hong Kong in 2011, paid for by a Swedish communications company, and a $600,000 speech in the Netherlands, also in 2011, paid for by a Dutch finance corporation.

Also, Renaissance Capital regularly invites world leaders to speak at its events, like former British Prime Minister Tony Blair and former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



I would be in favor of a Clinton Foundation investigation, but the
"Bill got paid 500 K by a Russian company, so that proves that the Clintons are in bed with the russians" narrative is weak sauce.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PepeDeFrog29
Russia Smussia. The left had best grab its pu$$y, hang on, and face up to the fact the Democrat Party has lost so much power because of its paranoid psychosis it is a freaking joke. Those pathetic pukes couldn't put together enough psychos to play pixie sticks at a Podesta spirit mixing pedo party. Pushing the narratives it is trolled to push only preserves its power at its present position-- paltry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PepeDeFrog29
In 2010, Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank, paid Bill Clinton $500,000 to deliver a speech, according to Hillary Clinton’s 2010 financial disclosure form.

Some critics of the Clintons have suggested this speaking fee might have been an attempt by Renaissance Capital to curry favor with the State Department, which was involved in the Uranium One deal at the time.

But it’s important to keep in mind that Bill Clinton regularly delivers speechesfor fees of $500,000 or higher — such as a $750,000 speech in Hong Kong in 2011, paid for by a Swedish communications company, and a $600,000 speech in the Netherlands, also in 2011, paid for by a Dutch finance corporation.

Also, Renaissance Capital regularly invites world leaders to speak at its events, like former British Prime Minister Tony Blair and former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



I would be in favor of a Clinton Foundation investigation, but the
"Bill got paid 500 K by a Russian company, so that proves that the Clintons are in bed with the russians" narrative is weak sauce.

The point is even after this guy divested he's still popping up near sources where the company could gain. I'd bet he had something to gain.
 
The point is even after this guy divested he's still popping up near sources where the company could gain. I'd bet he had something to gain.

Yes, he had 500,000 dollars to gain. Not out of line with what he gets for giving other speeches. Not out of line with what they pay others who they invite to speak. Yet, some want you to believe that it is a nefarious smoking gun. And you appear to be buying what they are selling.
 
Russia Smussia. The left had best grab its pu$$y, hang on, and face up to the fact the Democrat Party has lost so much power because of its paranoid psychosis it is a freaking joke. Those pathetic pukes couldn't put together enough psychos to play pixie sticks at a Podesta spirit mixing pedo party. Pushing the narratives it is trolled to push only preserves its power at its present position-- paltry.

giphy.gif
 
Yes, he had 500,000 dollars to gain. Not out of line with what he gets for giving other speeches. Not out of line with what they pay others who they invite to speak. Yet, some want you to believe that it is a nefarious smoking gun. And you appear to be buying what they are selling.

You misunderstood. Wrong guy.
 
Two Russky spies in the Oval with 100 percent TASS media--what could possibly go wrong??:cool:
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT