Was about to post on this very topic; not Maxine Waters specific, but a partial transcript from a recent Scott Adam's podcast:
@syskatine
@HanAholeSolo2.0 @DrunkenViking @CSCOTTOSUPOKES @HighStickHarry @osu_orangestreak @Ponca Dan @windriverrange @GunsOfFrankEaton etc, etc... oh @davidallen
Scott Adam's, not a republican, one time Bernie supporter, non-voter, and BIG time "listener," has this to say about what he now observes from the Left:
(time stamps)
10:05
“They are saying that Trump supporters should be singled out for actually retribution…”
10:36
“Now, here’s a thought that I’ve been having that’s growing stronger in me, most of you who have been following me for a while know that I am not a republican and that I don’t vote. I don’t vote because I don’t like to be influenced into team politics, even though at this point I am.
But, because I have been labeled as a Trump supporter, and I’ve already told you that I stopped appearing in public, and I’m quite serious about not appearing in public because of the physical danger where I live, especially in northern California, I just don’t think it would be safe.
And I was thinking to myself what would happen if Trump got, let’s say there was a blue wave and Trump got impeached?” I think it would be a dangerous situation for Trump supporters, wouldn’t you?
And I’m feeling like the best reason for republicans to vote is that they’re coming for you next, and they’re not hiding it. They are coming for Trump right now, but they are making it pretty clear that they are coming for Trump supporters next.
The one and only way to protect yourself is to make sure that they lose the election.
So, they’ve somehow made the only situation, uh, it’s amazing the bad strategy you see on the Left, the big way that anybody wins the midterm is by turnout, so whoever gets the best turnout wins. Because the sides are roughly even, the races that are even are the ones that matter, so turnout is the tie-breaker.
Who is going to get more turnout? I have a feeling that the republicans are going to by physically frightened because it’s real now, the left has made it clear that this is personal now, this is citizen-to-citizen. And probably the safest thing you can do, if you’re a republican, is to help get out the vote, because it’s going t be a dangerous place around here if the President gets impeached.
13:30
Right now I’m not worried about a revolution. But if President Trump gets impeached, while his performance is similar to what it is now, you know, 90% support on his side, um, that’s a dangerous situation. And, I’m actually considering voting for the first time, and I wouldn’t even be voting for candidates, I’d just be voting for a side. I’d just say republican, republican, republican…and I’m not even a republican, it’s not about policies or anything, it would be about pure self-defense, because I would want the safest situation for the country.
So here is the best get out the vote slogan that I can think of for republicans: “They’re coming for you next.” You know it’s true, they are coming for you next.
Pussyhat leadership is walking a fine line
They better be careful with what they call for
Sounds about right -- wingnuts are always accusing lefties of being violent and then being violent themselves, just like they accuse dems of being racist and then raise hell about how sorry blacks are. I don't wanna hear anybody from the right bitch about lefties being violent, in Oklahoma, where McVeigh went off. It's more of the same. This is just ANTIFA redux. Remember the obsession with ANTIFA on here and dangerous they were? Then white supremacists had their rally and boom -- killed people in their march in So Carolina or wherever. So, that narrative blows up frequently.
Two sets of wingnuts at work here: The ones just trying to claim victim status and justify hurting someone, and the ones that are too gd dumb and panicky to know any better. The former manipulates the latter.
Or what? Blow up another federal building? Shoot up another church? Drive a car through a crowd of protesters?
I can see you are uneducated regarding Scott Adams.
He's a tool.
But. Brad, you know I'm agnostic about the trade wars, I just don't know what to think. Of course, I'm inclined to not trust Biff on anything, but the Chinese damned sure aren't trustworthy, either. Are we on sound footing here? Is Biff doing the smart thing?
The Dow was down more than 400 points, with Boeing and Intel lagging. The S&P 500 fell 1.7 percent as tech declined. The Nasdaq sank 2.5 percent as Facebook, Amazon, Netflix and Google parent Alphabet dropped.
The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday that President Donald Trump plans to bar several Chinese companies from making investments in U.S. tech. The newspaper also reported that the administration wants to block additional technology exports to China. Both measures are expected to be announced by the end of the week.
://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/stocks-tumble-on-renewed-us-china-trade-jitters/ar-AAz7WOJ?li=BBnbfcN
How's he a tool, Sys?
I applaud Trump's efforts to create a more fair playing field.
As a democrat, what's your concern with a temporary hit to evil, capitalist pigs via a drawback on capital gains? Especially when the desired outcome is greater demand for domestically produced products?
You're asking poor questions Brad.
I remember as a child hearing the story that our protectionist policies were what hurt Detroit because the japanese made better cars while the U.S. car industry enjoyed a non-competitive auto trade her in the U.S. That was accepted wisdom at one point with free traders. I just don't know on this. I'm gonna keep my eyes open though, and hold Biff accountable if the economy turns to shit from this.
Sounds about right -- wingnuts are always accusing lefties of being violent and then being violent themselves, just like they accuse dems of being racist and then raise hell about how sorry blacks are. I don't wanna hear anybody from the right bitch about lefties being violent, in Oklahoma, where McVeigh went off. It's more of the same. This is just ANTIFA redux. Remember the obsession with ANTIFA on here and dangerous they were? Then white supremacists had their rally and boom -- killed people in their march in So Carolina or wherever. So, that narrative blows up frequently.
Two sets of wingnuts at work here: The ones just trying to claim victim status and justify hurting someone, and the ones that are too gd dumb and panicky to know any better. The former manipulates the latter.
Or what? Blow up another federal building? Shoot up another church? Drive a car through a crowd of protesters?
How's he a tool, Sys?
I applaud Trump's efforts to create a more fair playing field.
As a democrat, what's your concern with a temporary hit to evil, capitalist pigs via a drawback on capital gains? Especially when the desired outcome is greater demand for domestically produced products?
Sounds about right -- wingnuts are always accusing lefties of being violent and then being violent themselves, just like they accuse dems of being racist and then raise hell about how sorry blacks are. I don't wanna hear anybody from the right bitch about lefties being violent, in Oklahoma, where McVeigh went off. It's more of the same. This is just ANTIFA redux. Remember the obsession with ANTIFA on here and dangerous they were? Then white supremacists had their rally and boom -- killed people in their march in So Carolina or wherever. So, that narrative blows up frequently.
Two sets of wingnuts at work here: The ones just trying to claim victim status and justify hurting someone, and the ones that are too gd dumb and panicky to know any better. The former manipulates the latter.
Or what? Blow up another federal building? Shoot up another church? Drive a car through a crowd of protesters?
Or show up at a baseball practice and shoot a republican congressman?
Only a few hundred more to go!
Sadly enough, you probably aren't joking. Your big little brother shares the same feelings.Only a few hundred more to go!
Interesting you want to use past events to defend deplorable actions of your team instead of condemning them.
TDS much Pussyhat?
Interesting you want to use past events to defend deplorable actions of your team instead of condemning them.
TDS much Pussyhat?
The day will come, sooner that you all think, when Trump administration officials will look back fondly on the time when all they had to worry about was getting hollered at at a Mexican restaurant. When you aggressively **** with people’s lives, you should not be surprised when they decide to **** with yours.
What kind of sack? Grocery? Clothing? Scrotal? Burlap? I know better than to make assumptions about you weirdos.Oh hell trump was ranting about wanting to punch someone during the campaign and way more. I'm glad libs are finally growing a sack.
Oh hell trump was ranting about wanting to punch someone during the campaign and way more. I'm glad libs are finally growing a sack.
Don't be afraid. It'll be okay.
Oh I’m not worried. The more you all Pussyhat and scream like spoiled children the more it marginalizes your entire party.
At this rate you won’t even get a blue ripple, much less a wave.
Sorry the country isn't servile the way your Dear Leader wants.
Try looking at a mirror, lemming; but then again, never mind the cliff.
When you aggressively **** with people’s lives, you should not be surprised when they decide to **** with yours."
Sorry the country isn't servile the way your Dear Leader wants.
That wasn't a burnt and decapitated animal. It was just Maxine Waters doing some harrassment. I can see the confusion though...You must be confusing Trump with the Obama admin. You know, the worst admin since WWII.
It’s gonna get worse too Pussyhat
How are you going to defend spying and treason to retain power?
Own it Pussyhat.
Only a few hundred more to go!
Oh hell trump was ranting about wanting to punch someone during the campaign and way more. I'm glad libs are finally growing a sack.