What is the narrative as you see it?
Russia tried to assist, but failed?
Russia assisted but Trump didn't play ball?
Russia assisted but there was no quid pro quo?
Russia
- Thread starter Alpha Poke
- Start date
Russia tried to assist, but failed?
Russia assisted but Trump didn't play ball?
Russia assisted but there was no quid pro quo?
He does.
Maybe that's just how powerful tribalism is on a segment of left leaners. And/or the desire to be right/virtuous.
I get it. Nobody likes being wrong. Nobody wants to think they're easily manipulated.
Especially when they're told about it by an asshole such as myself.
No, we just have a bunch of botched set up attempts.
Why did Obama expedite the Russian spy into the country with the intent of making contact with team Trump?
That's a real head scratcher.
Why did Obama expedite the Russian spy into the country with the intent of making contact with team Trump?
That's a real head scratcher.
Her story has been around for a long time.
She was fast tracked by Obama knowing exactly what she was.
She was fast tracked by Obama knowing exactly what she was.
Google isn't helping me here which is why I'm starting to think you might be mistaken.
Yall talking about Natalia Veselnitskaya ?
The Hill has something July 2017 on her.
If not, I'll see myself out.
The Hill has something July 2017 on her.
If not, I'll see myself out.
U.S. Attorney for Utah John Huber won’t testify before House panel on Clinton probe
Washington • U.S. Attorney for Utah John Huber won't testify Thursday before the House Oversight subcommittee as its chairman had announced previously.
Huber had been assigned by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to investigate several controversies Republicans have raised about Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation, many of them stoked by right-wing activists who believe she should be prosecuted.
U.S. Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., chairman of the Oversight’s subcommittee on government operations, had hoped Huber would provide an update on his probe.
“Mr. Huber with the Department of Justice and FBI has been having an investigation — at least part of his task was to look at the Clinton Foundation and what may or may not have happened as it relates to improper activity with that charitable foundation, so we’ve set a hearing date for December the 5th,” he told Hill.TV previously.
That hearing was postponed until Thursday because of President George H.W. Bush's funeral service.
Meadows had wanted to quiz Huber on whether any of the Clinton Foundation’s tax-exempt money was used for personal gain, as well as a litany of other conservative allegations against Clinton, such as the State Department’s approval of a uranium deal with Russia.
The Oversight Committee, as with all other House panels, transfers to Democratic control next month because of the results of the midterm elections.
Huber's spokeswoman, Melodie Rydalch, confirmed that Huber wouldn't testify.
“Consistent with conversations between the department and the committee, Mr. Huber will not appear at the hearing,” she said.
The hearing will instead feature Tom Fitton, the head of the right-leaning Judicial Watch, a law professor and two tax professionals.
The purpose of the hearing, as the subcommittee announced, is to "discuss the management of 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations and how the designation impacts the programs and activities a nonprofit is allowed to conduct.” But the heading of the hearing is titled, “Oversight of nonprofit organizations: a case study on the Clinton Foundation.”
TL
R they didn’t find anything and dont want to be embarrassed. Hilary-ious.
U.S. Attorney for Utah John Huber won’t testify before House panel on Clinton probe
Washington • U.S. Attorney for Utah John Huber won't testify Thursday before the House Oversight subcommittee as its chairman had announced previously.
Huber had been assigned by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to investigate several controversies Republicans have raised about Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation, many of them stoked by right-wing activists who believe she should be prosecuted.
U.S. Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., chairman of the Oversight’s subcommittee on government operations, had hoped Huber would provide an update on his probe.
“Mr. Huber with the Department of Justice and FBI has been having an investigation — at least part of his task was to look at the Clinton Foundation and what may or may not have happened as it relates to improper activity with that charitable foundation, so we’ve set a hearing date for December the 5th,” he told Hill.TV previously.
That hearing was postponed until Thursday because of President George H.W. Bush's funeral service.
Meadows had wanted to quiz Huber on whether any of the Clinton Foundation’s tax-exempt money was used for personal gain, as well as a litany of other conservative allegations against Clinton, such as the State Department’s approval of a uranium deal with Russia.
The Oversight Committee, as with all other House panels, transfers to Democratic control next month because of the results of the midterm elections.
Huber's spokeswoman, Melodie Rydalch, confirmed that Huber wouldn't testify.
“Consistent with conversations between the department and the committee, Mr. Huber will not appear at the hearing,” she said.
The hearing will instead feature Tom Fitton, the head of the right-leaning Judicial Watch, a law professor and two tax professionals.
The purpose of the hearing, as the subcommittee announced, is to "discuss the management of 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations and how the designation impacts the programs and activities a nonprofit is allowed to conduct.” But the heading of the hearing is titled, “Oversight of nonprofit organizations: a case study on the Clinton Foundation.”
TL
Lol Alf? What's next?
getting back to “russian collusion” illusion
using ginned up fisa warrants
how’s all that going?
as americans anybody bothered
party sponsored dossiers used to spy on the opposition?
clapper says it’s a good thing
communist voting and “non-partisan”
brennan after years of file building his way to the top does the media fear building campaign then whines like a bitch
when trump yanks his clearances
comey does the pot shotting book campaign no doubt dumping the money into anything sheltered and non-personal when the man comes around
sure trump is crass
but you gotta be willfully ignorant and periphery focused to excuse this cancerous attempted coup
using ginned up fisa warrants
how’s all that going?
as americans anybody bothered
party sponsored dossiers used to spy on the opposition?
clapper says it’s a good thing
communist voting and “non-partisan”
brennan after years of file building his way to the top does the media fear building campaign then whines like a bitch
when trump yanks his clearances
comey does the pot shotting book campaign no doubt dumping the money into anything sheltered and non-personal when the man comes around
sure trump is crass
but you gotta be willfully ignorant and periphery focused to excuse this cancerous attempted coup
He literally didn’t leak anything, the investigation found no leaks, just improper contacts with his journalist/thang.
"During a Dec. 15, 2017, interview with FBI agents, Wolfe denied knowing four separate reporters. But phone records and photographic evidence showed that Wolfe knew the journalists, according to a grand jury indictment.
He pleaded guilty in October to lying about his contacts with one reporter.
Wolfe appears to have given journalists information about former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. The government indictment suggests that Wolfe gave reporter Ali Watkins information about Page for an article that she published on April 3, 2017. He also allegedly provided information to reporters for an Oct. 17, 2017, story about a subpoena issued against Page."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.7114bf0ad0d8
Wolfe was not charged with disclosing classified information, noted his attorneys, Preston Burton, Benjamin B. Klubes and Lauren Randell.
Wolfe was indicted June 7 on three counts of making false statements about his contacts with reporters while he served as the committee’s director of security, with duties that included overseeing the handling of secret and top-secret information turned over by the intelligence community for oversight purposes.
straight out of house of cards
he was giving 26yr old ali the business to boot
alas the fbi could find no evidence wolfe leaked info to her
Not being charged with disclosing classified information is quite different than...
He was found to have leaked information and then lied about it, leading to his indictment and guilty plea.
You can read the relevant document here:
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000166-793e-db94-aff6-fdfefe100001
he’s banging her
she writes the carter page story
and your here to tell us the
only thing he leaked was little wolfes
what a country
The “leaks” or conversations he had were not classified and therefore were not the crime. The lie or coverup was the crime as you can see in the indictment.
Who is saying that the leak was the crime? That's not communicated in anything I've posted.
It’s been inferred in Rcs posts. I quickly debated putting classified before leaks in my original post however I didn’t. It’s semantics but words matter.
So you countered what you thought was inferred with factually wrong information?
