I'm at an all time high skeptical level of Pres Trump right now but I find this accurate of the opposition narrative and it's sad.
The sun will supernova before that happens.Russia better be as big as watergate or I want to see a parade of liberals apologizing profusely.
Where do you get your news?I think it's been confirmed that there was no Russian hack. There was a DNC leak from a guy who got killed in a robbery where nothing was taken.
You'll have more success reversing the flow of the Nile or rebuilding Mt. St. Helens stone by stone with a plastic shovel and a radio flyer wagon.Russia better be as big as watergate or I want to see a parade of liberals apologizing profusely.
Where do you get your news?
Honestly who reads any publication anymore? Everything is pretty ala carte.Who the **** reads Newsweek?
NPR, NY Times, Boston Globe, WSJ typically...seriously seth rich gets killed and that's your take?
where do you get your news?
NPR, NY Times, Boston Globe, WSJ typically...
Yes, it explains why he is well-informed.
Is it well informed or well indoctrinated. Who knows with the way the media is now days.
I don't know what this guy is talking about. The Russian investigation is still proceeding. There is an open FBI investigation, as well as investigations in both houses of Congress.
Yes, Trump has attempted to change the conversation with his wag the dog saber-rattling. However, there is still much to learn and understand regarding Russian's interference in our election.
For the record, I've never come out in support of his dog wagging. In fact, it's really disappointed me - until he proves that it's not the start of another globalist intervention. I'm skeptical.
However, it is fascinating how much starch it took out of the media narrative of Russian collusion. Surely you would know that if you consider david's information sources to be good sources.
The unified establishment media/neocon/democrat Russia narrative has virtually rolled to a gentle stop in the middle of the road. 8 months of breathless dogmatic rhetoric, and zilch to show for it.
So does Trump owe Russians money?
Yes, it explains why he is well-informed.
there is still much to learn and understand regarding Russian's interference in our election.
However, it is fascinating how much starch it took out of the media narrative of Russian collusion.
The unified establishment media/neocon/democrat Russia narrative has virtually rolled to a gentle stop in the middle of the road. 8 months of breathless dogmatic rhetoric, and zilch to show for it.
What is there to "learn and understand?"
I'm going to guess not. Do you? I don't. Is this a common problem?
No, but I'm not the President. No, I don't think it's a common problem that our POTUS owes our enemy money. I've never heard of such a thing and no other POTUS would ever put themself in that position or refuse to disclose their finances so that the public can rest easy knowing there's no personal financial pressure at stake.
k
Sounds about as legit as Hillary being a Satanist.
Did Alex or Cernovich spread that, too? I haven't heard that one.
And he probably does owe Russians money, just from a Manhattan deal if nothing else. It's been widely reported.
She's a witch. I've seen pictures.
Hell sounds like you should be listening to her more then, shouldn't you?
I just won a $20 bet from @HighStickHarry that I could make you cry about the blog guy in one post that didn't include a reference to him.
I wonder if he likes spirit cooking...Styxendingle666? I'm his biggest fan. He really captures conservative thought!