ADVERTISEMENT

Russia dead end. Back to taxes.

It is amazing to me a DNC staffer is assassinated with no apparent motive and Dems and liberals have absolutely no intellectual curiosity about what happened to the poor kid.

Has the DNC even offered a reward to help catch the killer(s)?
 

I don't know what this guy is talking about. The Russian investigation is still proceeding. There is an open FBI investigation, as well as investigations in both houses of Congress.

Yes, Trump has attempted to change the conversation with his wag the dog saber-rattling. However, there is still much to learn and understand regarding Russian's interference in our election.
 
Is it well informed or well indoctrinated. Who knows with the way the media is now days.

The more sources one reads though, the less likely one will be "indoctrinated." Especially if one takes time to read sources that just don't reinforce what one already believes or wants to believe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
I don't know what this guy is talking about. The Russian investigation is still proceeding. There is an open FBI investigation, as well as investigations in both houses of Congress.

Yes, Trump has attempted to change the conversation with his wag the dog saber-rattling. However, there is still much to learn and understand regarding Russian's interference in our election.

For the record, I've never come out in support of his dog wagging. In fact, it's really disappointed me - until he proves that it's not the start of another globalist intervention. I'm skeptical.

However, it is fascinating how much starch it took out of the media narrative of Russian collusion. Surely you would know that if you consider david's information sources to be good sources.

The unified establishment media/neocon/democrat Russia narrative has virtually rolled to a gentle stop in the middle of the road. 8 months of breathless dogmatic rhetoric, and zilch to show for it.
 
For the record, I've never come out in support of his dog wagging. In fact, it's really disappointed me - until he proves that it's not the start of another globalist intervention. I'm skeptical.

However, it is fascinating how much starch it took out of the media narrative of Russian collusion. Surely you would know that if you consider david's information sources to be good sources.

The unified establishment media/neocon/democrat Russia narrative has virtually rolled to a gentle stop in the middle of the road. 8 months of breathless dogmatic rhetoric, and zilch to show for it.

So does Trump owe Russians money?
 
However, it is fascinating how much starch it took out of the media narrative of Russian collusion.

The unified establishment media/neocon/democrat Russia narrative has virtually rolled to a gentle stop in the middle of the road. 8 months of breathless dogmatic rhetoric, and zilch to show for it.

I disagree with you that it has rolled to a stop. Just today it was being discussed on CBS This Morning. I see it still being discussed in numerous places. I really don't know where you are getting this.

Yes, the media has been distracted from "solely" talking about Russia's influence on our election and possible collusion on the part of the Trump campaign. If that is what you are claiming, then I would agree with you.

The investigation is far from over though.
 
What is there to "learn and understand?"

Well, there are still a number of things that need to be learned. For instance, has the FBI or the intelligence agencies discovered any evidence that Russia was simply trying to hurt Clinton or also actively trying to help Trump? If there was collusion, how far did it go? Was there collusion between the Russian government and senior officials in the Trump campaign? What did Trump know and when did he know it? Etc.

We also need to understand all that Russia did so we can ensure this doesn't happen again.
 
I'm going to guess not. Do you? I don't. Is this a common problem?

No, but I'm not the President. No, I don't think it's a common problem that our POTUS owes our enemy money. I've never heard of such a thing and no other POTUS would ever put themself in that position or refuse to disclose their finances so that the public can rest easy knowing there's no personal financial pressure at stake.
 
No, but I'm not the President. No, I don't think it's a common problem that our POTUS owes our enemy money. I've never heard of such a thing and no other POTUS would ever put themself in that position or refuse to disclose their finances so that the public can rest easy knowing there's no personal financial pressure at stake.

k

Sounds about as legit as Hillary being a Satanist.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT