ADVERTISEMENT

Roy Moore accuser admits to forging yearbook inscription

Remember: hoaxes are a big part of leftist / Marxist strategy.


Before the last five years, there was no one willing (or able) to document the many hoaxes and call them out.


These hoaxes are from the last year alone.



DPjdiJVWAAA7gpO





13362826_f520.jpg
 
An update to this story reflects that Beverly Young Nelson admits writing what ABC News characterized as “notes” beneath what she says is Roy Moore’s signature, and that the only notes below the signature are the date and location. Furthermore, the headline on story now specifies that Nelson admits to writing part of the inscription herself, rather than forging part of it.
 
The cited article from Fox News doesn’t even say what the OP says it does.

Wonder if that is evidence of intent to deceive by OP or lack of reading comprehension by OP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Been Jammin
ABC has it also but they, like their MSM brethren, are refusing to call it forgery. Rather, she added notes in the margins of the inscription.

Because it ain’t forgery. She didn’t admit to forgery.

Just saying....
 
  • Like
Reactions: hollywood
Guys, quit worrying. The Gang Of Pedophiles is going to win this one.

@NZ Poke , you're kind of the point man on pedophile conspiracies after you were spreading around the Comet Pizza deal. How come no comments after all these accusers came forth? Did you see where Mr. Moore was banned from a shopping mall for skeezing on the sweet young things?
 
big ups for use of skeez

haven't heard that one since playing foosball and drinking mass quantities of pitcher beer
many many dog years ago

i.e. slow roller from the 3man was skeeeeezy!
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_xl72qcu5isp39
Because it ain’t forgery. She didn’t admit to forgery.

Just saying....

What’s your definition of forgery?

This yearbook thing has great potential to move this case one way or the other. I found it very interesting that the Moore camp revealed that the complainant had his signature on a divorce decree, but it turned out to have been written by an assistant with the initials D.A. This should be easily established as fact or debunked by examination of archived records and doesn’t need to have Allred relinquish possession of the yearbook. But what do we, the people, get? Nothing. It’s disappointing that investigative journalists aren’t more motivated on this sort of thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
What’s your definition of forgery?

This yearbook thing has great potential to move this case one way or the other. I found it very interesting that the Moore camp revealed that the complainant had his signature on a divorce decree, but it turned out to have been written by an assistant with the initials D.A. This should be easily established as fact or debunked by examination of archived records and doesn’t need to have Allred relinquish possession of the yearbook. But what do we, the people, get? Nothing. It’s disappointing that investigative journalists aren’t more motivated on this sort of thing.

I know this...adding a date and other notes below a note and signature a written by the person that signed it doesn’t meet the legal definition or commonly understood definition of “forging and inscription” or “forging a signature”.

For all I know, it could be forged.....but the article cited definitely DID NOT reflect that she admitted to forging the inscription or signature like the OP claimed.

That MAY come later.....but this isn’t that.
 
Moore absolutely needs to get thrashed tomorrow. Afraid if he did get elected and then they leave some type of "kick the bum outa here" to the brain dead RINO's in Congress he might never leave or be kicked out.

I do believe his accusers BTW and while it would be easy to pay off hard luck cases to make stuff up, don't see this as the case here. But wouldn't put it past either party to do....ever!

Never accept a morally flawed candidate elect to increase, maintain or stop from losing a majority in Congress.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT