Cowboy Phil...here is what Weekly Standard has to say and they agree with you.
Jeb’s Dead: Adiós Amigo
TheBush hit on Rubiowas obviously premeditated, so it wasn’t gaffe or a mistak. It was a revealing measure of his political talent and judgment. Let’s count the ways in which it was strategically ill-conceived and tactically incompetent:
1) He attacked Rubio not from a position of strength, but of weakness. “I’m a constituent and you’re not doing your job for me” is the personal complaint of a whiner. He looked like a disgruntled employee, not a leader.
2) He attacked Rubio on grounds of procedure and not substance. However important they might be, no one actually cares about voting absentee rates—the same way they don’t care about filibuster rules or the nuclear option. To think thatthiswas the angle to blow up Rubio is insane.
3) As I said, Bush’s attack was almost certainly a pre-meditated set piece. Yet he didn’t have the political sense to see that Rubio was in a very good frame coming off of an answer where he beat the snot out of the moderators. Bush had no ability to read the scene and understand that it would have been better in that momentnotto take the shot. He had a plan, so he robotically stuck to it.
4) On top of all of that, Bush didn’t understand that Rubio’s biggest concern at this point is being slotted as a tool of the establishment. Getting attacked bytheestablishment guy is the best luck Rubio could wish for. The only thing Bush accomplished is helping Rubio cross over, which will lift him in the polls, which will increase the donor pressure on Bush to drop out.
In sum: Bush’s attack on Rubio was both a tactical and strategic failure. His campaign is cooked.
The RNC is a joke. The fact that they let John Harwood be one of the moderators of a republican debate is ridiculous.
Also the line of attack the Rubio camp probably spent hours preparing for.Cowboy Phil...here is what Weekly Standard has to say and they agree with you.
Jeb’s Dead: Adiós Amigo
TheBush hit on Rubiowas obviously premeditated, so it wasn’t gaffe or a mistak. It was a revealing measure of his political talent and judgment. Let’s count the ways in which it was strategically ill-conceived and tactically incompetent:
1) He attacked Rubio not from a position of strength, but of weakness. “I’m a constituent and you’re not doing your job for me” is the personal complaint of a whiner. He looked like a disgruntled employee, not a leader.
2) He attacked Rubio on grounds of procedure and not substance. However important they might be, no one actually cares about voting absentee rates—the same way they don’t care about filibuster rules or the nuclear option. To think thatthiswas the angle to blow up Rubio is insane.
3) As I said, Bush’s attack was almost certainly a pre-meditated set piece. Yet he didn’t have the political sense to see that Rubio was in a very good frame coming off of an answer where he beat the snot out of the moderators. Bush had no ability to read the scene and understand that it would have been better in that momentnotto take the shot. He had a plan, so he robotically stuck to it.
4) On top of all of that, Bush didn’t understand that Rubio’s biggest concern at this point is being slotted as a tool of the establishment. Getting attacked bytheestablishment guy is the best luck Rubio could wish for. The only thing Bush accomplished is helping Rubio cross over, which will lift him in the polls, which will increase the donor pressure on Bush to drop out.
In sum: Bush’s attack on Rubio was both a tactical and strategic failure. His campaign is cooked.
Curious as to why you include Christie.There are 6 candidates with any shot of getting the nomination.
- Rubio
- Cruz
- Trump
- Carson
- Christie (ick)
- Fiorina
Unless some other person currently not involved in the campaign is picked as a running mate, the most likely GOP ticket is some combination of Rubio/Cruz/Fiorina.
Couldn't have said it better myself. However, I'm not convinced Cruz has a very good chance; he seems to come off as too angry much of the time.I think Christie and Carson have the least chance of any I listed. I personally don't like Christie, but he has some things to recommend him. He has executive experience and is well known and has a good grasp on many issues. He has shown up well in each debate, though last night was his best and he hasn;t been overwhelmingly great in any of the 3.
Carson is an intelligent guy with an outsider's appeal. But, he is way too soft spoken and a politcial novice.
Honestly, I think it will be either Rubio or Cruz and Firoina as VP. But, it's a long time to decision time.
Granted it's early, and I haven't been able to pay as much attention as most of you all, but a Rubio/Carly ticket (or vice versa) seems like the strongest optionI'd be very happy with a Cruz/Carly or Rubio/Carly ticket. If Cruz isn't on the top of ticket I hope he's Secretary of State nominee if GOP wins.
We also have to include the establishment republicans. They'd rather lose to the democrats than actually do anything which would get them removed from the Christmas party lists.I'm not surprised in the least. In fact, I've come to expect that the media will do all they can to help the Democratic Party. Well, marginalizing and discrediting all other candidates is a great way to do it.
Why does it take candidates sooooo long to figure things out.. Quit being a Boehner arse kissing conservative and go for what the people on your side are wanting. Geez, why do they think Trump has been leading? We don't necessarily want Trump, we just don't want a wuss.Heard somewhere today that Cruz's contributions really took off the last couple of days.
Why does it take candidates sooooo long to figure things out.. Quit being a Boehner arse kissing conservative and go for what the people on your side are wanting. Geez, why do they think Trump has been leading? We don't necessarily want Trump, we just don't want a wuss.
I agree on Cruz. I was referring to the professional politicians running. When 1, 2 or all of the the 3 non politicians drop, their supporters are going to go somewhere, and the candidate that gets them imo is the most anti - establishment one. Cruz made a big leap attacking the left in public.Cruz hasn't been kissing anyone's butt.
If anything, he's been the bane of the GOP establishment for a long time now.
Rubio? That's a different story.
He is really smart. He is the only candidate I can think of that can package what GOP primary voters want as something general election voters can palate.I think Cruz would be a disaster as a general election candidate. Maybe he would prove me wrong but I see him having extremely high appeal to a small group of voters but high negatives amongst independents and moderate Republicans.
He is really smart. He is the only candidate I can think of that can package what GOP primary voters want as something general election voters can palate.