ADVERTISEMENT

Rachel Maddow

aix_xpert

Heisman Winner
Sep 5, 2001
14,392
16,306
113
Exact quote tonight during her dissertation on the impact of Dems winning the house:

"He (Trump) doesn't enjoy confrontation. He's about to get some."


I know she doesn't like Trump and she's speaking to her base; so be it. That's not what's strange here. What planet have you had to live on for the past 3 years to think that Donald Trump doesn't enjoy confrontation? Dude basically goes out looking for it if its quiet more than 3 straight days.
 
There will be so many ways to spin this night and both sides will be filled with superlatives as to why they performed better than they thought.

Trump has a free path now to pick off another SCOTUS nominee and get some type of border control compromise. But to get much else done people will have to work together. Fun times ahead.
 
Exact quote tonight during her dissertation on the impact of Dems winning the house:

"He (Trump) doesn't enjoy confrontation. He's about to get some."


I know she doesn't like Trump and she's speaking to her base; so be it. That's not what's strange here. What planet have you had to live on for the past 3 years to think that Donald Trump doesn't enjoy confrontation? Dude basically goes out looking for it if its quiet more than 3 straight days.

It's his bread and butter look at Warren, he got under her skin so much that she did a DNA test and told us all she's 1/1,000 of native american. She would not have done that if Trump didn't keep poking at her.
 
It's his bread and butter look at Warren, he got under her skin so much that she did a DNA test and told us all she's 1/1,000 of native american. She would not have done that if Trump didn't keep poking at her.

Do you think his poking serves any positive purpose? Wouldn’t you prefer he spend his time working with Democrats to write sensible legislations and actually “MAGA”?
 
Do you think his poking serves any positive purpose? Wouldn’t you prefer he spend his time working with Democrats to write sensible legislations and actually “MAGA”?

Yes and no. There are times I think it's justified but he can some times drag it out or take it to far.

BUT that's not the point the point is that Madow thinks that he doesn't like confrontation when its the opposite.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aix_xpert
Yes and no. There are times I think it's justified but he can some times drag it out or take it to far.

BUT that's not the point the point is that Madow thinks that he doesn't like confrontation when its the opposite.

Exactly. I made no judgement on whether it was good or bad. I simply stated that absurdity of the position that Trump doesn't enjoy confrontation, when the last 3 years evidence runs pretty counter to that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OSUIvan
Do you think his poking serves any positive purpose? Wouldn’t you prefer he spend his time working with Democrats to write sensible legislations and actually “MAGA”?
No. Why should he have to work with Dems to write left approved legislation? Why don’t the Dems have to work with him? As long as the left continues to be trash, I’m 100% ok with him trolling.
 
No. Why should he have to work with Dems to write left approved legislation? Why don’t the Dems have to work with him? As long as the left continues to be trash, I’m 100% ok with him trolling.

Doesn’t want:

- Bipartisan healthcare reform
- Bipartisan immigration reform
- Bipartisan budget deficit reduction plans
- Bipartisan infrastructure plan
- Bipartisan marijuana legislation
- Bipartisan energy policies

Brilliant!
 
Doesn’t want:

- Bipartisan healthcare reform
- Bipartisan immigration reform
- Bipartisan budget deficit reduction plans
- Bipartisan infrastructure plan
- Bipartisan marijuana legislation
- Bipartisan energy policies

Brilliant!
Define bipartisan. Please show me where a single person on the left in a position of power has offered anything bipartisan.
 
Doesn’t want:

- Bipartisan healthcare reform
- Bipartisan immigration reform
- Bipartisan budget deficit reduction plans
- Bipartisan infrastructure plan
- Bipartisan marijuana legislation
- Bipartisan energy policies

Brilliant!

Just because John McCain or some other RINO put his name on a piece of paper written by a dozen Libs does not make something bi-partisan. I suspect real bipartisan legislation will get done. You'll know it because both sides will hate it. For example: The omnibus bill. Dems hated it for the Military spend increases, Reps hated it for the social increases, and Trump threatened to veto it. But in the end, it was bipartisan and thus passed.

In reality, I expect that there will be some measure of marijuana legislation passed. Healthcare - not unless you suddenly see the 100% premium spikes again in the news, although you could see some prescription drug legislation; Immigration - HA!; Budget deficit plans - neither side wants that pain; infrastructure plan - this is popular but I don't think it happens. Interest rates are already popping, and the economy doesn't need a government spending jolt. So while the country needs an infrastructure overhaul, the economy doesn't. This should have been Obama's #1 initiative (instead of OCare) and they would have put him on Rushmore. And finally, Bipartisan energy plans - Thats comical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: okcpokefan12
She would not have done that if Trump didn't keep poking at her.

Damn man, she'd be the next to last* vag he, or anyone with an ounce of penetration sense, would ever "poke".






*HumaCank wins DFL!
 
  • Like
Reactions: OSUIvan
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT