I have a question for our attorneys on the board.
Wouldn’t an athlete have a solid legal case that the NCAA is impeding an athlete’s ability to fully garner NIL capacity with this ruling? I mean there is advertisement on the uniform in the form of Nike, Under Armor, Adidas, etc… and Big 12 is advertised.
Why wouldn’t a student athlete or better yet why wouldn’t an attorney want to jump at the chance to take on the National Communist on this issue?
Wouldn’t an athlete have a solid legal case that the NCAA is impeding an athlete’s ability to fully garner NIL capacity with this ruling? I mean there is advertisement on the uniform in the form of Nike, Under Armor, Adidas, etc… and Big 12 is advertised.
Why wouldn’t a student athlete or better yet why wouldn’t an attorney want to jump at the chance to take on the National Communist on this issue?
