ADVERTISEMENT

Power Abusing Liars...

Meanwhile, unprecedented lying, corruption and nepotism and not a peep from you.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
  • I did not support Trump. I'm on the record of thinking he is an obnoxious and poorly skilled politician.
  • This is (yet another) clearly documented case of an Obama administration (the most transparent administration in history TM) figure lying; in Rice's case, multiple times personally
  • The media are clutching pearls and getting the vapors 24/7 at any and every utterance or action from the Trump Administration at controversies, both real and imagined
  • You are on the case
  • The nepotism charge is a hoot after "2 for the Price of One" and the Hillarycare debacle of 1993
  • Trump will have to get to work to beat the institutionalized corruption of the previous administration. I'm not suggesting he/they aren't up to it, but I would say it's definitely "precedented"
 
Last edited:
hildecankles and the dems ran on a two part platform

1. this whole emotional togetherness thing without study it's what is called
"identity politics"

2. their political skill set is based on lies and corruption

this dumass that allegedly took the skirt pics is being indicted for destruction of evidence

and hilldebeast was hammering phones

trump may make church ladies cringe and snowflakes melt but at the least he unabashadley takes the heat for it.

as for the poorly skilled politician comments

last week the worm turned, he's had enough of ryan, mcconnell and their yeast infections
 
Did you bother to read down to the part where Trey Gowdy(R-GA) hardly a fan of democrats or the Obama administration) said that Rice did a good job with her testimony and that there was basically nothing illegal in what she did?

Hell, Trump is claiming that what Comey did in forwarding his notes to others was illegal as well and should result in his prosecution. When nearly every single expert has said that there was absolutely nothing illegal in what Comey did.

So since when is a Trump pronouncement on the legality/illegality of something somehow the final word on the matter?
 
Did you bother to read down to the part where Trey Gowdy(R-GA) hardly a fan of democrats or the Obama administration) said that Rice did a good job with her testimony and that there was basically nothing illegal in what she did?

Hell, Trump is claiming that what Comey did in forwarding his notes to others was illegal as well and should result in his prosecution. When nearly every single expert has said that there was absolutely nothing illegal in what Comey did.

So since when is a Trump pronouncement on the legality/illegality of something somehow the final word on the matter?

Which experts said what Comey did was fine? Seems like every story I read implied that notes taken in his official role are the property of the FBI and at a minimum needed to be reviewed for data classification prior to distribution. His meetings with Trump weren't him having a beer with his buddy. These were president and head of the FBI and thus any artifact generated by those meetings are government property. By the way, this isn't any different than in the real world. If you create something as part of an organization, its not yours to share. That includes work notes.
 
Did you bother to read down to the part where Trey Gowdy(R-GA) hardly a fan of democrats or the Obama administration) said that Rice did a good job with her testimony and that there was basically nothing illegal in what she did?

Hell, Trump is claiming that what Comey did in forwarding his notes to others was illegal as well and should result in his prosecution. When nearly every single expert has said that there was absolutely nothing illegal in what Comey did.

So since when is a Trump pronouncement on the legality/illegality of something somehow the final word on the matter?
Well if Trey Gowdy says so then that settles it. Comey absolutely DID violate administrative rules at a minimum.

Who quoted Trump as the ultimate authority; (he simply commented on the story; and of course did so in the most bombastic way possible)? She ****ing lied about it. Why? Because she knew what she did was wrong. Why believe her explanation as to hwy she did it now?
 
Last edited:
Did you bother to read down to the part where Trey Gowdy(R-GA) hardly a fan of democrats or the Obama administration) said that Rice did a good job with her testimony and that there was basically nothing illegal in what she did?

Hell, Trump is claiming that what Comey did in forwarding his notes to others was illegal as well and should result in his prosecution. When nearly every single expert has said that there was absolutely nothing illegal in what Comey did.

So since when is a Trump pronouncement on the legality/illegality of something somehow the final word on the matter?


gowdy is typical ryan mcconnell douche material

she played it one way to the press in april
then came back and retestified

yea great effing job
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT