Many would proudly lay down their life for a cause as important as <checks notes> the state of the union venue.I say it's time for war....whatever that is!! Hell, we having war now I guess. What these morons don't get is the fact that if you compromise both sides can call themselves winners. When they won't even come to the table the tide will turn.
they've got nothin' left but to be able to refuse to negotiate. that won't last long. he's in 3d chess mode right now...she's not even at the board. When you got nothin' that's what you do...a constant state of denial.Many would proudly lay down their life for a cause as important as <checks notes> the state of the union venue.
The strong do what they will, the weak endure what they mustthey've got nothin' left but to be able to refuse to negotiate. that won't last long. he's in 3d chess mode right now...she's not even at the board. When you got nothin' that's what you do...a constant state of denial.
a self made billionaire vs a bunch of government employees....is the betting window still open?The strong do what they will, the weak endure what they must
We talking about Amazon vs. the Post Office?a self made billionaire vs a bunch of government employees....is the betting window still open?
Self made billionaire...questionable. Politics and government are different games. I will cover your bet.a self made billionaire vs a bunch of government employees....is the betting window still open?
First—Open the Government.
Your demands of trump are not even considered. We voted for a secure border and if that means shutting it down until pelosi strokes out so be it.
Just give the State of the Union address to a half empty chamber. Then rail on the half that chose the policy of #resist as their platform with no willingness to come together for a common solution.
How's that?So now Nancy is holding the entire country hostage as opposed to just 800,000 government employees. Nice.
She’s not disallowing the SOTU.
She’s just not letting in happen in Trump’s preferred venue.
Just give the State of the Union address to a half empty chamber. Then rail on the half that chose the policy of #resist as their platform with no willingness to come together for a common solution.
Lol what?
So give it in the Senate chambers and put any House members that want to attend in the balcony.
This.There isn’t even a requirement that he make a speech as a part the SOTU.
I know. So?There isn’t even a requirement that he make a speech as a part the SOTU.
There is no Constitutional requirement that he give the SOTU in a speech in the Capitol before the Joint Houses of Congress.
That didn’t start until Woodrow Wilson.
Trump can give his SOTU in writing to Congress just like all Presidents did for the first century of the US’s existence.
He can give it broadcasting from Mir-a-Lago or wherever else he’d like.
She’s keeping him from giving it in the venue he wants, but she ain’t...can’t....keep him from giving it.
Give me a break. There is precedent and modern tradition. It’s not the “venue he wants” it’s what is expected in 2019.
I think I heard your fence post talking smack you better get outside and let it know who is boss.
I know. So?
There is also precedent and history of it not being given in a speech in that venue.
She isn’t in any way disallowing him the SOTU.
What I said was absolutely true and accurate.
“Modern tradition”? That’s a decent oxymoron.
That kid in the red hat really got him fired up. Feels young again.Feeling particularly combative today or something?
Yes I get what you said was true. I also did not get turned down for sex by Elton John this morning.
Not really. I know there is no constitutional requirement to give the state of the union via a speech to the combined chambers. I don't think there is a requirement to give it each year. Doesn't it say from 'time to time'?Feeling particularly combative today or something?
So she'll block him from walking into the chambers? Even as a guest of one of the members of the House of Representatives?
Just walk into the chambers and take the podium. Make them remove him.
Not really. I know there is no constitutional requirement to give the state of the union via a speech to the combined chambers. I don't think there is a requirement to give it each year. Doesn't it say from 'time to time'?
I just don't see how that's germane to the conversation. Nancy is being a twit by her actions. She's within her authority as speaker of the house to do so. But that doesn't make her any less petty or us calling her out for it any less applicable.
Here's the thing. The left calls Trump an asshole. So to combat Trump they decide they have to be even bigger assholes. That's a horrible strategy.
If I'm a Dem, I don't grant Trump the empty canvas they just handed him.
Hell, for optics, I WANT him in the House, so that half of what the people see is our seated, frowning disagreement with him.
As well as Pelosi supporters.