ADVERTISEMENT

Pelosi rejects Trump request for SOTU

I say it's time for war....whatever that is!! Hell, we having war now I guess. What these morons don't get is the fact that if you compromise both sides can call themselves winners. When they won't even come to the table the tide will turn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ostatedchi
I say it's time for war....whatever that is!! Hell, we having war now I guess. What these morons don't get is the fact that if you compromise both sides can call themselves winners. When they won't even come to the table the tide will turn.
Many would proudly lay down their life for a cause as important as <checks notes> the state of the union venue.
 
Many would proudly lay down their life for a cause as important as <checks notes> the state of the union venue.
they've got nothin' left but to be able to refuse to negotiate. that won't last long. he's in 3d chess mode right now...she's not even at the board. When you got nothin' that's what you do...a constant state of denial.
 
they've got nothin' left but to be able to refuse to negotiate. that won't last long. he's in 3d chess mode right now...she's not even at the board. When you got nothin' that's what you do...a constant state of denial.
The strong do what they will, the weak endure what they must
 
  • Like
Reactions: CowboyJD
a self made billionaire vs a bunch of government employees....is the betting window still open?
Self made billionaire...questionable. Politics and government are different games. I will cover your bet.
 
Last edited:
So now Nancy is holding the entire country hostage as opposed to just 800,000 government employees. Nice.
 
can one fathom a congressperson disallowing a state of the union address?

otards banana republic lives on
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ostatedchi
Your demands of trump are not even considered. We voted for a secure border and if that means shutting it down until pelosi strokes out so be it.

Just give the State of the Union address to a half empty chamber. Then rail on the half that chose the policy of #resist as their platform with no willingness to come together for a common solution.
 
Just give the State of the Union address to a half empty chamber. Then rail on the half that chose the policy of #resist as their platform with no willingness to come together for a common solution.

I agree. They serve no purpose anyway.
 
Just give the State of the Union address to a half empty chamber. Then rail on the half that chose the policy of #resist as their platform with no willingness to come together for a common solution.

that’s where this is at

dems voted for a wall
dems railed for strong borders
now none of that happened

it’s just resist
 
So give it in the Senate chambers and put any House members that want to attend in the balcony.
 
Lol what?

There is no Constitutional requirement that he give the SOTU in a speech in the Capitol before the Joint Houses of Congress.

That didn’t start until Woodrow Wilson.

Trump can give his SOTU in writing to Congress just like all Presidents did for the first century of the US’s existence.

He can give it broadcasting from Mir-a-Lago or wherever else he’d like.

She’s keeping him from giving it in the venue he wants, but she ain’t...can’t....keep him from giving it.
 
So she'll block him from walking into the chambers? Even as a guest of one of the members of the House of Representatives?

Just walk into the chambers and take the podium. Make them remove him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CowboyJD
Hahahahahahaha

(I got quite the chuckle from Pelosi's response)
 
There is no Constitutional requirement that he give the SOTU in a speech in the Capitol before the Joint Houses of Congress.

That didn’t start until Woodrow Wilson.

Trump can give his SOTU in writing to Congress just like all Presidents did for the first century of the US’s existence.

He can give it broadcasting from Mir-a-Lago or wherever else he’d like.

She’s keeping him from giving it in the venue he wants, but she ain’t...can’t....keep him from giving it.

Give me a break. There is precedent and modern tradition. It’s not the “venue he wants” it’s what is expected in 2019.

I think I heard your fence post talking smack you better get outside and let it know who is boss.
 
Give me a break. There is precedent and modern tradition. It’s not the “venue he wants” it’s what is expected in 2019.

I think I heard your fence post talking smack you better get outside and let it know who is boss.

There is also precedent and history of it not being given in a speech in that venue.

She isn’t in any way disallowing him the SOTU.

What I said was absolutely true and accurate.

“Modern tradition”? That’s a decent oxymoron.
 
There is also precedent and history of it not being given in a speech in that venue.

She isn’t in any way disallowing him the SOTU.

What I said was absolutely true and accurate.

“Modern tradition”? That’s a decent oxymoron.

Yes I get what you said was true. I also did not get turned down for sex by Elton John this morning.
 
Chains off!!

tenor.gif
 
Feeling particularly combative today or something?
Not really. I know there is no constitutional requirement to give the state of the union via a speech to the combined chambers. I don't think there is a requirement to give it each year. Doesn't it say from 'time to time'?

I just don't see how that's germane to the conversation. Nancy is being a twit by her actions. She's within her authority as speaker of the house to do so. But that doesn't make her any less petty or us calling her out for it any less applicable.

Here's the thing. The left calls Trump an asshole. So to combat Trump they decide they have to be even bigger assholes. That's a horrible strategy.
 
If I'm a Dem, I don't grant Trump the empty canvas they just handed him.

Hell, for optics, I WANT him in the House, so that half of what the people see is our seated, frowning disagreement with him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CowboyJD
Not really. I know there is no constitutional requirement to give the state of the union via a speech to the combined chambers. I don't think there is a requirement to give it each year. Doesn't it say from 'time to time'?

I just don't see how that's germane to the conversation. Nancy is being a twit by her actions. She's within her authority as speaker of the house to do so. But that doesn't make her any less petty or us calling her out for it any less applicable.

Here's the thing. The left calls Trump an asshole. So to combat Trump they decide they have to be even bigger assholes. That's a horrible strategy.

You said he should instead give it in the Senate instead.

I merely pointed out he doesn’t even have to give it at all.

Seemed germane to the conversation to me.

And yes, this is all petty BS distractionary upping the ante by both of them. At this point, I’m kinda interested in how far either one is going to take this. Trying to be a bigger asshole than Trump wouldn’t be my strategy, but just pointing out his asshole behavior hasn’t been terribly effective for them so far. Many of his supporters seem to actually enjoy when he is an asshole.
 
If I'm a Dem, I don't grant Trump the empty canvas they just handed him.

Hell, for optics, I WANT him in the House, so that half of what the people see is our seated, frowning disagreement with him.

Yep.

I don’t think they can beat him in the petty meaningless one-up-manship arena....he’s been doing that most of his lifetime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Been Jammin
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT