ADVERTISEMENT

On Antisemitism, Trump and Israel

As someone with a history degree that’s kinda the way I remember the books reading. Maybe the movie left that part out?

Neo-Nazism consists of post-World War II militant social or political movements seeking to revive and implement the ideology of Nazism. Neo-Nazis seek to employ their ideology to promote hatred and attack minorities, or in some cases to create a fascist political state.[1][2] It is a global phenomenon, with organized representation in many countries and international networks. It borrows elements from Nazi doctrine, including ultranationalism, racism, xenophobia, ableism, homophobia, anti-Romanyism, antisemitism, anti-communism and initiating the Fourth Reich. Holocaust denial is a common feature, as is the incorporation of Nazi symbols and admiration of Adolf Hitler.
 
A nonsense statement doesn’t need much of a contrary argument.

Fox News has just as many viewers as CNN and MSNBC combined. You don’t factor in alternate media....which is as much responsible for the divide as MSM....at all.

Add every sitcom, daytime talk show, late night talk show, drama and where morons shop for news, celebrity social media.
 
Add every sitcom, daytime talk show, late night talk show, drama and where morons shop for news, celebrity social media.

Trump tweets, MAGA social media, Alex Jones, Limbaugh.

Can’t really believe someone can seriously allege the division in America is primarily the fault of one side or the other.
 
Neo-Nazism consists of post-World War II militant social or political movements seeking to revive and implement the ideology of Nazism. Neo-Nazis seek to employ their ideology to promote hatred and attack minorities, or in some cases to create a fascist political state.[1][2] It is a global phenomenon, with organized representation in many countries and international networks. It borrows elements from Nazi doctrine, including ultranationalism, racism, xenophobia, ableism, homophobia, anti-Romanyism, antisemitism, anti-communism and initiating the Fourth Reich. Holocaust denial is a common feature, as is the incorporation of Nazi symbols and admiration of Adolf Hitler.

So not even a neo nazi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AC_Exotic
Trump tweets, MAGA social media, Alex Jones, Limbaugh.

Can’t really believe someone can seriously allege the division in America is primarily the fault of one side or the other.

I can say it more heavily weighted on the left and not censored.

>90% negative news about Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: okcpokefan12
Joe and Mika

Steve Schmidt (this guy is so bad he stands alone as a prominent talking head on tv)

Lawrence O’Donnell

Chris Matthews

Stephanie rhule and Ali vilesh

Diane sawyer crying on election night

The view is a liberal hate club on during the day of a major network, its been on for 20 years.

There is no Fox News equivalent to all that. Hannity and tucker. Fox and friends isn’t divisive. The five isn’t divisive. Slanted but not hate filled.

Shep Smith is so anti trump he probably has to decompress at the spa after every show.

There is no equivalent on cnn or msnbc to that. An entire hour or two a day hosted by someone completely against the agenda of the brand.

No shit, I’m Not trying to goad you I just have no clue how you can add all that up and come to the conclusion you are currently arguing.
 
Joe and Mika

Steve Schmidt (this guy is so bad he stands alone as a prominent talking head on tv)

Lawrence O’Donnell

Chris Matthews

Stephanie rhule and Ali vilesh

Diane sawyer crying on election night

The view is a liberal hate club on during the day of a major network, its been on for 20 years.

There is no Fox News equivalent to all that. Hannity and tucker. Fox and friends isn’t divisive. The five isn’t divisive. Slanted but not hate filled.

Shep Smith is so anti trump he probably has to decompress at the spa after every show.

There is no equivalent on cnn or msnbc to that. An entire hour or two a day hosted by someone completely against the agenda of the brand.

No shit, I’m Not trying to goad you I just have no clue how you can add all that up and come to the conclusion you are currently arguing.

Get help....seriously.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Been Jammin
You’re welcome.

Don’t see much point in a back and forth restatement of an unprovable opinion.


My opinion is based on numbers that haven't changed since the election.

What are you using Skippy? Feels?
 
You don’t get that I really have no interest in trying to change your mind, do you?


But yet you spend Post after post after post engaging and discussing nz. You literally talk to Ponca dan admitting he has you on ignore.

I know exactly why you have no interest in this topic.
 
But yet you spend Post after post after post engaging and discussing nz. You literally talk to Ponca dan admitting he has you on ignore.

I know exactly why you have no interest in this topic.

Sure thing, Sparky. o_O

NZ’s posts are dangerous and Anti-Semitic.

I mock Ponca Dan for putting me on ignore for the benefit of others and my own amusement.

You’re just a rando-nut self-admittedly obsessed with “the enemy” trying to prove an unprovable opinion who has already wildly exaggerated supposed “empirical research” regarding NPR.

Let me check my give a damn meter....

Nope, still empty.
 
But feel free to proclaim yourself the winner.

You can even believe it with all your heart and mind.

No skin off my nose.
 
Interesting column on the subject from a NR writer that isn't necessarily a Trump fan.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018...j4c4iKMz3_8YPDHFb8xmR-Xd158pxqjV9BtHyATenSa1c

Any reasonable person should agree with these comments:

But it is not irrational to want refugees vetted for their willingness to assimilate to American values. It is not racist to want to know whether immigrants are trying to enter the United States for true asylum or for economic reasons. It is not bigoted to ask about the criminal backgrounds of people trying to walk across America’s border. It is not cruel to ask about the economic impact on the United States of people seeking to enter.
 
Any reasonable person should agree with these comments:

But it is not irrational to want refugees vetted for their willingness to assimilate to American values. It is not racist to want to know whether immigrants are trying to enter the United States for true asylum or for economic reasons. It is not bigoted to ask about the criminal backgrounds of people trying to walk across America’s border. It is not cruel to ask about the economic impact on the United States of people seeking to enter.

Agree. Perfectly logical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AC_Exotic
Sure thing, Sparky. o_O

NZ’s posts are dangerous and Anti-Semitic.

I mock Ponca Dan for putting me on ignore for the benefit of others and my own amusement.

You’re just a rando-nut self-admittedly obsessed with “the enemy” trying to prove an unprovable opinion who has already wildly exaggerated supposed “empirical research” regarding NPR.

Let me check my give a damn meter....

Nope, still empty.

I proved my opinion. I compared apples to apples. With specific examples. You deflected, and busted out you don’t care now and some mild salsa insults. You’ve done that before and it’s beneath you.

I’ve seen you argue to the granular layer on dozens of topics but this is the second time you’ve decided not to care when presented with evidence when dealing with me.

I’ll just ask up front next Time if it’s a topic you want to bring evidence to or if your give a damn meter is empty.
 
I proved my opinion. I compared apples to apples. With specific examples. You deflected, and busted out you don’t care now and some mild salsa insults. You’ve done that before and it’s beneath you.

I’ve seen you argue to the granular layer on dozens of topics but this is the second time you’ve decided not to care when presented with evidence when dealing with me.

I’ll just ask up front next Time if it’s a topic you want to bring evidence to or if your give a damn meter is empty.

I understand you believe that you “proved you opinion”.

And I’m cool with you believing that.
 
I understand you believe that you “proved you opinion”.

And I’m cool with you believing that.


Just admit you don’t watch as much tv as me and that my opinion is more valid than yours based on that fact so we can stop playing last word.
 
Just admit you don’t watch as much tv as me and that my opinion is more valid than yours based on that fact so we can stop playing last word.

I’ll admit I don’t watch as much tv as you.

That doesn’t, however, make your opinion on who is more responsible for the divide in the electorate more valid.

I met you halfway.
 
I’ll admit I don’t watch as much tv as you.

That doesn’t, however, make your opinion on who is more responsible for the divide in the electorate more valid.

I met you halfway.

I don’t spend as much time in courtrooms as you. You want to hear some of my notes on your strategy?
 
I don’t spend as much time in courtrooms as you. You want to hear some of my notes on your strategy?

If your opinion was, and this discussion was about, “is there more anti-Trump media than there is anti-left media”, the discussion would be over.....but that isn’t what we were discussing.

I guess if the MSM just stopped reporting negatively on Trump, we’d all be singing Kumbaya and there would be no division.

But sure....fire away on whatever notes you might have.
 
You’ve taken a single data point...a single “fact” (exaggerated when it comes to NPR, but okay) and violá....your opinion on the larger issue and question is supposedly “proven”.

That’s not how things work Harry.
 
The left and right bullhorns are their respective medias. There is no unbiased news, you’ve admitted that before. The media talks to the country by the tens of millions of people spitting their parties’ bs. The loony angry left dominates that space. Ergo the left is more divisive.
 
You’ve taken a single data point...a single “fact” (exaggerated when it comes to NPR, but okay) and violá....your opinion on the larger issue and question is supposedly “proven”.

That’s not how things work Harry.

I did not exaggerate npr. They are left wing nuts who race bait at cnn msnbc levels.
 
You’ve taken a single data point...a single “fact” (exaggerated when it comes to NPR, but okay) and violá....your opinion on the larger issue and question is supposedly “proven”.

That’s not how things work Harry.

There’s a post up there with several data points. And it’s just a small sample.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT