wow all of them failed.....thought for sure the 5% set aside for future hard times would have passed.
Oklahoma SQ’s
- Thread starter windriverrange
- Start date
SQ 794, the victim's rights measure, PASSED, and by a wide margin, 78-22.
Victims already had rights under the state constitution. I don’t believe they should be influencing parole hearings.
Well of course a convicted sex offender would have that stance. You'd love to get off the state registration data base.
If I were you I'd not want my victim testifying against me at my parole hearing either.
“Convicted”
“Database”
Chickenshit gonna chickenshit lol. Still wouldn’t say it to my face haha
Is that a threat of physical violence against me? Or are you saying you'd molest me too? You'd have to get me unconscious first, right?
If you’re looking for explanation of why you don’t think I “act human” on this board, you’ve got your answers.
How about in-person clarification? Or are you still a chickenshit pussy safe behind your keyboard lol. I’m betting on status quo for ya
Dude.
It did NOT go well for you the last time you made this kind of challenge.
Honestly you can’t dig a hole in the mud with your hands and wonder why you are dirty.
I don’t know what your plan is with everyone else, but if you quote me in goid faith I will answer in good faith.
I honestly thought you were being funny and a little self deprecating at first.
I’m serious...if the chickenshit can’t come out from behind his keyboard and say it to my face, which he once claimed he “happily would”, he’s a chickenshit pussy and will be forever known as one by everybody.
I voted against it also. The reasoning is that we already have legislation that does these things. There was no reason that this needed to be constitutional. Also, being a constitutional amendment makes it harder to change if there are unforeseen consequences.
I've no problem meeting you in person or telling this to you live. With that being said, are you saying that your reply will be physical? That's not a concern of mine. But I would like to know.
Do you think we will see trump/McConnell/pelosi legislation on anything big or is it get trump!/defend trump! for the next two years
Your Dr. probably has a better bedside manner, but the message is the same.
I voted no for all of them. I’m also surprised Oklahomans didn’t choose profits over people (Walmart)
We were just about opposite. I voted 'no' on the optometrists but it was mostly due to the fact that they wanted to make the change to the state constitution to do it.
I liked the school question as it seemed like it would put more power on the spending closer to the people whose kids are actually in that school district.
Regarding the oil/gas tax investments, I like savings accounts and felt like this would have been a good one to have.
Thanks for the correction......was positive one of the news stations last night said they all were "no's." Oh well, glad that one passed.
I think this would have taken 5% of it and put it into a 401k type investment account
