Are board anti-Trumpers in favor of PEACH MINT?
@Syskatine
@pokeatard
@Been Jammin
@osu_orangestreak
@07pilt
@Syskatine
@pokeatard
@Been Jammin
@osu_orangestreak
@07pilt
Now that it's plain to see Mueller SC was a partisan hit job....
- Thread starter CBradSmith
- Start date
I'll mark you down for PEACH MINT.
@CBradSmith, now Pokeabear is suddenly a fan of John Solomon... L-O-L!
I can see it now.....Ben and Jerry's introduces a new flavored ice cream....Peach Mint. 
I can see it now.....Ben and Jerry's introduces a new flavored ice cream....Peach Mint.
With little strings of tam and pon-anon.............
Hey that is a great flavor and tasty.I can see it now.....Ben and Jerry's introduces a new flavored ice cream....Peach Mint.
If that scum bag had found collusion, does anyone think he wouldn’t have found a way to charge a sitting president?
Of course he would.
He found nothing. And then when his garbage lazy report didn’t create the firestorm he hoped, he called this presser to push it across the finish line.
It’s a joke. He’s a joke. He was never serious.
Fvck him. Barr by contrast, is a hero of the republic.
Of course he would.
He found nothing. And then when his garbage lazy report didn’t create the firestorm he hoped, he called this presser to push it across the finish line.
It’s a joke. He’s a joke. He was never serious.
Fvck him. Barr by contrast, is a hero of the republic.
Yeah Ol Mush Mouth Maxine Waters loves Peach Mint Ice Cream.
If he didn't prosecute him he exonerated him. No such thing as almost guilty or almost innocent.
If he didn't prosecute him he exonerated him. No such thing as almost guilty or almost innocent.
According to Justice departments guide line a sitting president cannot be indicted because of the burden it will cause to the presidency.
Therefore it is up to the congress. Oh shit the republicans control the senate thus two third majority in the senate is impossible and after impeachment in the house the trial is held in the senate.
Therefore it is up to the congress. Oh shit the republicans control the senate thus two third majority in the senate is impossible and after impeachment in the house the trial is held in the senate.
Mueller found NO collusion, see page 2 of the report.
He found no conspiracy. Nobody agreed to do anything for what Trump has been alleged to suggest. Got to have two or more people agree to do something to be a conspiracy.
He identified several instances where he was unable to determine if obstruction occurred. One either obstructs or one doesn't. Since Mueller didn't conclusively state there was collusion it didn't happen. In fact, Trump did not fire Mueller, exert executive privilege, or hamper or obstruct the investigation in any manner as the MSNBC or CNN or Comey, Clapper and Brennan et al said for almost 2 years. Worse, Mueller punted the decision to the AG and Deputy AG who assigned and supervised Mueller. They had the balls to make the decision which is surprising since Andrew Weisman was one of Mueller's Gang. Weisman has never met a lie or rule he wasn't willing to use or break to achieve his goal.
As far as being able to indict, if Mueller knew going into the investigation that he couldn't indict, then WTF did he even investigate? Waste of time and money especially if all he got was process crimes about tax evasion, taxi tokens, perjury traps and FARA violations. All unrelated to collusion, conspiracy or obstruction.
Mueller could have done precisely what Starr did with Clinton. Starr specifically stated 11 crimes Clinton committed in his report.
Starr did not indict the president. Starr's character as an obvious cheat and a liar was exposed during A&M scandal.
Starr was staunch conservative republican investigating a democrat president.
All his 11 crimes were connected with Clinton's sexual behavior.
Mueller is a republican judging a republican president. Trump refused to be interviewed because his lawyers thought he would commit perjury. His written
answers to questions were at best vague.
Mueller left it up to the congress to try him for obstruction of justice.
Starr was staunch conservative republican investigating a democrat president.
All his 11 crimes were connected with Clinton's sexual behavior.
Mueller is a republican judging a republican president. Trump refused to be interviewed because his lawyers thought he would commit perjury. His written
answers to questions were at best vague.
Mueller left it up to the congress to try him for obstruction of justice.
True on the indictment. However, Starr did list the crimes Clinton committed one of which Clinton admitted. And it was Baylor.
Irrelevant as to Starr's politics or Mueller's. Starr didn't load his investigation with a bevy of partisan lawyers nor former employees of Bush or Dole. And let's not forget that Peter Strzok, an absolutely conflicted principal in the Trump coup attempt and author of the "insurance policy", was also on Mueller's team. Do we need to discuss the conflicts of interest Mueller brought into the investigation?
Trump's refusal to be interviewed was brilliant. Mueller could have force it but likely already knew there was no Russian collusion. Afterall, Mueller had already interview everyone else who would have had knowledge of any Trump duplicity or collusion and still found nothing. Vague or not, if Mueller didn't like Trump's written answers he had options to compel testimony.
Mueller only speculated on obstruction or any other crime. Starr specifically identified crimes.
Irrelevant as to Starr's politics or Mueller's. Starr didn't load his investigation with a bevy of partisan lawyers nor former employees of Bush or Dole. And let's not forget that Peter Strzok, an absolutely conflicted principal in the Trump coup attempt and author of the "insurance policy", was also on Mueller's team. Do we need to discuss the conflicts of interest Mueller brought into the investigation?
Trump's refusal to be interviewed was brilliant. Mueller could have force it but likely already knew there was no Russian collusion. Afterall, Mueller had already interview everyone else who would have had knowledge of any Trump duplicity or collusion and still found nothing. Vague or not, if Mueller didn't like Trump's written answers he had options to compel testimony.
Mueller only speculated on obstruction or any other crime. Starr specifically identified crimes.
Oh please. Trump wanted to get interviewed by Mueller,the lawyers thought he couldn't say two sentences without lying. If Muelller persisted there would have been court case.
I am sorry, I like Mueller because of his service to the country and has a character
unlike Starr.
I believe his report was criticized also at that time,I remember Starr because of A^&M
what a crook.
I am sorry, I like Mueller because of his service to the country and has a character
unlike Starr.
I believe his report was criticized also at that time,I remember Starr because of A^&M
what a crook.
Pro tip. You don’t do sarcasm well.
fyi we’ve done the “let the truth prevail” dance
for the duration of the mueller investigation
this isn’t law and order
it’s a sinister weaponizing of government assets to abate the lawfully elected government of the united states of america
real third world malarkey
for the legitimacy of the republic
the actors must be held accountable
when all this started
there was a discussion about investigators playing with house money, facing no personal repercussions for their use of law to manipulate those investigated
mueller holds a presser to announce he’s said all he’s gonna say and return to private life
bob dearly needs to answer a few questions before the people
he had no trouble operating on their dime
There's lots of questions Mueller doesn't want to answer under oath. If he does, he'll claim he can't speak due to "sources and methods" or grand jury restrictions. It's likely Mueller wasn't that involved with the investigation. His demeanor in his statement showed a lack of comprehension of the facts. Almost like someone else wrote the speech.
All I need to know is not one person has been charged with collusion or obstruction.
Two years, millions of documents, thousand+ witnesses, a secret grand jury, close to 40 million spent.
They ginned up some bs false statement charges and found some old tax crap that they had previously refused to prosecute trying to get people to give dirt on the President. Apparently they didn't have any dirt to give.
So outside of some Russians who spent a paltry few hundred thousand dollars trying to cause trouble. They found nothing to charge anyone associated with Trump.
Fraud investigation and I hope Bill Barr goes full ninja on anyone conspiring to take down a lawfully elected President.
Two years, millions of documents, thousand+ witnesses, a secret grand jury, close to 40 million spent.
They ginned up some bs false statement charges and found some old tax crap that they had previously refused to prosecute trying to get people to give dirt on the President. Apparently they didn't have any dirt to give.
So outside of some Russians who spent a paltry few hundred thousand dollars trying to cause trouble. They found nothing to charge anyone associated with Trump.
Fraud investigation and I hope Bill Barr goes full ninja on anyone conspiring to take down a lawfully elected President.
The Muell.... uh.. Weissmann investigation was always an impeachment probe.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/05/robert-mueller-investigation-was-always-impeachment-probe/
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/05/robert-mueller-investigation-was-always-impeachment-probe/
The witch hunt team deceitfully impacted the midterm elections by dragging this lie out. It would still be going on without Barr’s appointment.
Change my mind.
Change my mind.
