ADVERTISEMENT

Nobody ever rigs elections, right?

Still grabbing em. Lol

main-qimg-672713bed65f2d314b6b11c92c718c93
 
Fake electors? Was this a bunch of mannequins in business attire or something? How does one “fake” an elector? Seems like all electors and ballots are legit until the trier of fact declares otherwise, which never happened.

Yes…mannequins in business attire…also known as Republican politicians and their staff and lawyers…

which you would’ve known had you…


read the article.




Chickensh!ts gonna chickensh!t





carry on
 
I don't need to read cnn bs, it's easy to pick out. They must be complaining about the alternate electors that Trump sent which was a precedent set by democrats for this very scenario. Not hard to figure out but keep throwing fake news around. You would think cnn would have journalistic integrity....what am I saying cnn hasn't been credible since Kosovo and Clinton.
 
I don't need to read cnn bs, it's easy to pick out. They must be complaining about the alternate electors that Trump sent which was a precedent set by democrats for this very scenario. Not hard to figure out but keep throwing fake news around. You would think cnn would have journalistic integrity....what am I saying cnn hasn't been credible since Kosovo and Clinton.

Do you think they doctored audio of Michigan investigators questioning unindicted co-conspirator Trump lawyer Kenneth Chesbro? Playing the SoUrcEs card with this one? Cmon man lol

Fvcking whiny chickensh!ts, like a toddler afraid of losing their security blanket haha





carry on
 
Do you think they doctored audio of Michigan investigators questioning unindicted co-conspirator Trump lawyer Kenneth Chesbro? Playing the SoUrcEs card with this one? Cmon man lol

Fvcking whiny chickensh!ts, like a toddler afraid of losing their security blanket haha





carry on
So what did he do wrong. What you call fake electors Trump calls alternative electors. If you knew anything about history you would know its been done before....oh wait again I forgot you don't know jack and sh!t left town.
 
So what did he do wrong. What you call fake electors Trump calls alternative electors. If you knew anything about history you would know its been done before....oh wait again I forgot you don't know jack and sh!t left town.

On October 20, 2023, he pleaded guilty to one felony count of conspiracy to commit filing false documents.[7]As part of his plea bargain, Chesebro accepted five years of probation, $5,000 in restitution, 100 hours of community service, and agreed to testify against Donald Trump and the remaining defendants.[8]




carry on
 
Yes…mannequins in business attire…also known as Republican politicians and their staff and lawyers…

which you would’ve known had you…


read the article.




Chickensh!ts gonna chickensh!t





carry on
I read the article. It doesn’t say what you think it says, Coach Sandusky.


Tuck on, pedoscott.
 
So what did he do wrong. What you call fake electors Trump calls alternative electors. If you knew anything about history you would know its been done before....oh wait again I forgot you don't know jack and sh!t left town.
Each state has "electors" for both sides, nothing at all stopping both sets going to DC.......but, in Navada, ( and in a few other state) the Democrats won and the election was certified, the GOP electors filled out documents indicating that they won the state and sent those electors and those documents to Congress as the winners of the state...that's fraud...and they now have corroborating evidence that Trump and his team coordinated all of this.......that is illegal.......the Dems have sent alternate electors also, but they were not dumb enough ( I know hard to believe) to sign the fraudulent documents and present them to Congress as the real thing
 
Each state has "electors" for both sides, nothing at all stopping both sets going to DC.......but, in Navada, ( and in a few other state) the Democrats won and the election was certified, the GOP electors filled out documents indicating that they won the state and sent those electors and those documents to Congress as the winners of the state...that's fraud...and they now have corroborating evidence that Trump and his team coordinated all of this.......that is illegal.......the Dems have sent alternate electors also, but they were not dumb enough ( I know hard to believe) to sign the fraudulent documents and present them to Congress as the real thing
There is no law about it. The electors were sent because they believed the elections were the fraud, and they believed they would have enough corroborating evidence to back that up.

Unfortunately, you are wrong on the sign the documents things. They did and even overturned the Hawaii election between JFK and Nixon. It didn't affect the outcome of the election, but it successfully overturned the results in Hawaii. You can look it up. They even overturned it after the Dec 20 official count and made it official. This was Trump's intent from the start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
There is a law, its called fraud........you cannot sign an official document knowingly stating something that is not trust.........that is exactly what they are charging the GOP electors in Nevada........once the election has been certified it is considered closed
 
There is a law, its called fraud........you cannot sign an official document knowingly stating something that is not trust.........that is exactly what they are charging the GOP electors in Nevada........once the election has been certified it is considered closed
Not so, again look at the 1960 election. The change was conducted after the certification.

Also, to commit fraud one has to knowingly be doing the act as a deceit. The electors where not deceitful. They believed they were following precedent set in 1960. Doing so in private has no bearing on that one way or the other.

There is no law set forth in how to contest an election. What lawful process should they follow if they wish to do just that?
There isn't one, just a precedent set by dems in 1960. FYI there were many people who thought the 1960 election was rigged as well.
 
BTW, in Hawaii they were allowed to because they were still in the middle of a court ordered recount because of tabulation errors.........in the end, the recount showed JFK as the winner
You mean like recounts that were still being conducted in Arizona and contested results in Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Georgia because of tabulation errors as well some very dubious behavior from election officials that were also in question.

Not seeing the difference. Nixon was certified the winner in Hawaii, then it changed later to JFK. Two sets of electors were picked.
 
In Hawaii the recount was ordered by the courts, was still ongoing, and both sides agreed to it........the contested results in the state you mentioned were not being contested through the courts at that time, the courts had already ruled that they were legitimate......and Georgia had finished their investigation on the "dubious behavior" of the election officials and found nothing wrong by that time.....Rudy gets to pay what $143 million because of that
 
  • Haha
Reactions: okcpokefan12
In Hawaii the recount was ordered by the courts, was still ongoing, and both sides agreed to it........the contested results in the state you mentioned were not being contested through the courts at that time, the courts had already ruled that they were legitimate......and Georgia had finished their investigation on the "dubious behavior" of the election officials and found nothing wrong by that time.....Rudy gets to pay what $143 million because of that
That courts had ruled that they were not going to hear the cases at that time. Most of the cases were simply dismissed without a second thought. However, there was still litigation still pending in the courts in all states that sent alternative electors. Also the case to make Rudy pay was not litigated until well after the election, meaning the case was still in the courts, and that case could have gone either way. So yes, it applies to the usage of alternative electors even if Rudi ends up the loser of the case it justifies the usage of the alternative electors as the decision was not finalized at the time.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT