No Voter Fraud
- Thread starter Marshal Jim Duncan
- Start date
30 days in jail and 1 year probation isn't enough for this crime.
It's more serious than drugs imo.
It's more serious than drugs imo.
If you don’t get to vote because you can’t produce state required ID that counts as suppression. Interestingly in the article it notes that Democrats polled believe that 1 person being denied the opportunity to vote is worse than 10,000 voting illegally. Pretty telling. On the other hand, Republicans polled believe both are important to stop although they are convinced that fraud is by far a bigger actual current problem.
Well, when you include being turned away to vote for reasons stated in a state law as suppression....
Note: 70% of Americans believe that voter ID laws are a good idea.
Note: 70% of Americans believe that voter ID laws are a good idea.
Do you believe native Americans on reservations with PO boxes should be denied the right to vote?
Don't worry fellas, there are people out there effectively fighting election fraud.
That's a court document. I'll have to look at the actual issue.
In the meantime, would this be voter suppression if true?
https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/...s-that-voting-could-nix-out-of-state-licenses
JFC lol...
“Paid for and authorized by the North Dakota Democratic-NPL Party. Not authorized by any candidates or candidate's committee. www.demnpl.com.
Copyright © 2018 North Dakota Democratic-NPL Party. All rights reserved.”
Nice try haha
The North Dakota Democratic-NPL Party is the North Dakota affiliate of the national Democratic Party. If that story is true, would that be voter suppression?
Well, unless the ad was done without the party's consent/knowledge or the news story is completely made up, it appears to be true.
Would that be considered voter suppression?
In my opinion that isn't voter suppression. At least not a systematic, official suppression of votes. I'd liken it more to idiots falling for fake news and letting that influence your vote.
It is an attempt to influence the election by getting people to fall for the ploy in order to have them skip voting.
I can't blame the judge for his decision this close to the election.
I'm not a fan of the law as currently written, although a physical address is also required to get a license to drive. Outside of the PO box issue, how can homeless folks vote?
