You did notice that you used the word GLOBAL didn't you? So why to you only reference the Continental US, which accounts for about 2.6% of the Globe and ignore those hurricanes that came ashore in the outer-lying areas (Caribbean, Mexico, Yucatan Peninsula, etc.) at a higher intensity rate?
Are we suppose to likewise ignore what is going on in the Pacific? (like the strongest Typhoon in recorded history, which killed 6,300 in the Philippines alone?)
Or the Hurricanes that have hit Europe over the last few years, one of which (St. Jude/Cyclone Christian) lead to the highest recorded winds in the history of Denmark, and which killed some 17 in the UK?
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/scien...g-pacific-typhoons-stronger-180955443/?no-ist
http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/1/4/e1500014.full
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Jude_storm
If you're going to talk about something on a global scale, it's kind of disingenuous to only offer up what is happening in the USA as a rebuttal to the general point. (And ignores the other 97% of the global surface.)