If they do not have such a policy why do they do it?
If they do not have such a policy why do they do it?
Quite the head scratcher. Maybe they're..... lying?
Look how Brad supports lying. He ridicules anyone that points it out.
Well, technically, if the kids are with an adult(s) who isn't a family member (might be specifically parent) on arrival, they get separated from the adult(s) for safety. If the parent(s) is being prosecuted for breaking the law, kids can't be detained for more than 20 days, so the kids are placed with family in the US if available or in DHHS care if not while the parents are detained. Not much different than US citizens who have been detained for a crime.If they do not have such a policy why do they do it?
Don't be so sad, Syster.
You too can win.
![]()
Well, technically, if the kids are with an adult(s) who isn't a family member (might be specifically parent) on arrival, they get separated from the adult(s) for safety. If the parent(s) is being prosecuted for breaking the law, kids can't be detained for more than 20 days, so the kids are placed with family in the US if available or in DHHS care if not while the parents are detained. Not much different than US citizens who have been detained for a crime.
At least that's what I understand from reading about it.
Well, let’s see.
But, hell, it’s only for 20 days or so, and then she will be put in a wonderful government housing facility. So, I suppose, that makes everything alright. HSHarry assures is she is better off. What more assurance do we need?
I am not a Christian. Do not believe in God, don’t go to a church. But I try to practice Christian ethics in my life. Do unto others, things like that. There is no way I would want others to do those things to me. What our government has done to that three year old and her mother is indescribably evil. To think otherwise is contrary to Christian ethics. This country should not be doing these things to these children.
That is one of your most distasteful posts ever and that is really saying something. Sometimes I enjoy getting you out of your rut but not at this price. It's too much. Even Alf wouldn't post that. Okay, Alf probably proudboi'd to it, but you know what I mean. Dayum dude. You may have just started something here. Dwight. Brad. Lot of similarities to hash through.
See Dwight's socks? He got em' cheap. Just isolating this conversation to his choice of socks, you're all in on that aren't you? You can save what.... $38 a year wearing those 5 for $3 dress socks? If you'd hire a good illegal housekeeper she'd handle that laundry for you, you'd have pristine white socks to wear to work, and everybody's a winner.
This is your final lifecoaching session: You should open your wallet and welcome the illegals and make some relationships. Let's face it, your best option for a decent lifemate is exploiting a penniless refugee. Ideally one that can't understand you.
Think of the money you can generate by paying a housekeeper $10 per hour to do your laundry and moisturize your bench-style, virgin vinyl, pickup seat so you're freed up to work. Plus, if you move in the right Guatemalan that's on the run - say, a third generation field whore - she'll embrace the parsimony and be impressed with the incelmobile. You rejected my last solution for your sitch, this is next best. Look south.
Don't be so sad, Syster.
You too can win.
![]()
That is one of your most distasteful posts ever and that is really saying something. Sometimes I enjoy getting you out of your rut but not at this price. It's too much. Even Alf wouldn't post that. Okay, Alf probably proudboi'd to it, but you know what I mean. Dayum dude. You may have just started something here. Dwight. Brad. Lot of similarities to hash through.
See Dwight's socks? He got em' cheap. Just isolating this conversation to his choice of socks, you're all in on that aren't you? You can save what.... $38 a year wearing those 5 for $3 dress socks? If you'd hire a good illegal housekeeper she'd handle that laundry for you, you'd have pristine white socks to wear to work, and everybody's a winner.
This is your final lifecoaching session: You should open your wallet and welcome the illegals and make some relationships. Let's face it, your best option for a decent lifemate is exploiting a penniless refugee. Ideally one that can't understand you.
Think of the money you can generate by paying a housekeeper $10 per hour to do your laundry and moisturize your bench-style, virgin vinyl, pickup seat so you're freed up to work. Plus, if you move in the right Guatemalan that's on the run - say, a third generation field whore - she'll embrace the parsimony and be impressed with the incelmobile. You rejected my last solution for your sitch, this is next best. Look south.
Dan,
Mighty rich of you in your folksy way to get after people whose tenants you don't feel are being enacted HOW YOU interpret them.
Sounds like you know the Bible cover to cover and are pretty close with a God you don't believe in.
Let me spare myself more time and cut to the chase, you find God, educate yourself more than a verse or 2 deep, then come back and maybe expect that your lecturing might be taken as something intended as edifying instead of the pompous spewing it really is.
Thanks. Pic?
Yes, I can see how you would regard what I wrote as pompous spewing. You are probably correct. Somewhere in the Bible it probably says it’s OK to do what our government does. Since the Bible says it’s a good Christian thing to take babies from their mothers, maybe the law should be changed so we as individual citizens could snap up any child we felt would be better under our care. Is that what you think? Or am I being too pompous here?
Maybe I would understand what you wrote if I knew who Cathy Newman is.No, Cathy Newman, that's not what I'm saying.
A bit of an icon in the Incel boyz club. She had a run in with the Messiah some time back.Maybe I would understand what you wrote if I knew who Cathy Newman is.
Caught her just now, post workout, using selfie mode.Thanks. Pic?
Outkicked your coverage. Let her know many believe she can do better!
Maybe I would understand what you wrote if I knew who Cathy Newman is.
So where in my monologue did I put words in anyone else’s mouth? I painted a picture of how I see the situation. Please feel free to paint your own picture and we can “dialogue” about the differences.It means try not to put words in people's mouths and you'll come across as desiring a dialogue instead of painting a picture of what you believe the other to be or represent.
David's remark is sadly inadequate.
Any links to this?She is not allowed to be embraced, held, spoken softly to. No adult is allowed to touch her.
Outkicked your coverage. Let her know many believe she can do better!
I don’t know about that. I, personally, find @CBradSmith HIGHLY attractive.
She isn't putting up with your shit very long.
I refer you to the 2nd paragraph.Any links to this?
***has a hot wife, never ****s her, spends all his time on here projecting delusions of grandeur (including selfies) while she cooks and cleans***
You’re a helluva life role model lol
Frankly, I'm stunned that you posted her picture. And yours. You do understand what the consequences of that could be? I'm a lib, and a loving, nice guy but still....
Frankly, I'm stunned that you posted her picture. And yours. You do understand what the consequences of that could be? I'm a lib, and a loving, nice guy but still....
Random homophobia...never fvcks his wife...posts selfies on male dominated chat...
Does brad have something to tell us?