ADVERTISEMENT

MSNBC host: 63 million Trump voters should be targeted for being “Nazis”

NZ Poke

Heisman Candidate
Dec 16, 2007
6,088
7,047
113




Incidentally:


cato-free-speech-survey-main-report-14.jpg



Source: https://www.cato.org/survey-reports/state-free-speech-tolerance-america




Related:


BB7017_EB_6009_4806_812_B_D50_A087_ADB47.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
down the road, when the normal, regular every day middle of the road liberals like @Been Jammin wonder what the hell happened to the blue wave and how Trump got re-elected so easily, maybe then they will wake up and do something about the leftists that have hijacked their party and run it into the ground with idiotic apocalyptic hyperbolic nazi rhetoric like this.
 
Nazi = National Socialist German Workers' Party

Don't think many of those 63 million are socialists. On the other hand, Bernie and demlibs are spittin' images of that party.

If the demlibs were true to the definition they would gladly claim the word Nazi and refer to themselves as such.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
Blows my mind that anyone with 1/10th of a brain would make such an absurd and hyper outrageous utterance. But need to keep letting these imbeciles run their pie holes though....any moderates out there that didn’t vote for DRT but are reaping some of the economic benefits of his policies must be really lost.

As someone (like others here) who has studied history, almost exclusively (with a large emphasis on WWII), it’s really impossible to ever take the person that says that, the network that allows that to be promulgated and the supporting cast with any degree of validity.
 
More people to thank for Trunp’s re-election.



@syskatine weren’t you a big fan of “stormy’s” lawyer? Why nothing from that brainiac lately?

Avenatti is a broke hustler. He's in So Tx helping kids in front of tv cameras. Funny you bring him up: Can you believe that Trump was screwing a porn star, without protection, with a newlywed and infant son at home?
 
Avenatti is a broke hustler. He's in So Tx helping kids in front of tv cameras. Funny you bring him up: Can you believe that Trump was screwing a porn star, without protection, with a newlywed and infant son at home?

So shocking. Rich powerful men have proven to be so sensible in their monogamy over the years. Trump really busts the mold and should be talked about as unique. The outrage should equal that uniqueness.

I just can’t believe it, sys! I need an outrage iv bag just to replenish myself!

Seriously what’s it like to have tds? Do you forget reality or do you know it’s there but you can compartmentalize it somehow? Explain it to us.
 
Seriously what’s it like to have tds? Do you forget reality or do you know it’s there but you can compartmentalize it somehow? Explain it to us.
Read up on Pavlov's dogs. It's probably the best insight into the mind of a Trumpanzee.
 
Liberals are people who resort to the same tactics they supposedly detest when they disagree with someone or something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: imprimis
I remember my union iron worker uncles who were solid Dems in the nineties convincing me what Clinton did with women had zero to do with the booming economy. A guy works that hard and wants a bj, that’s none of our business.

Now, sys can’t believe it, he just can’t believe trump had affair over ten years ago while his third wife was down the hall.
 
I somehow had higher expectations for the high-ranking government agents who tried to rig the election for Hillary, and kept her out of jail.

You guys gotta read this — I don’t even know where to start.


 
  • Like
Reactions: Rdcldad
I remember my union iron worker uncles who were solid Dems in the nineties convincing me what Clinton did with women had zero to do with the booming economy. A guy works that hard and wants a bj, that’s none of our business.

Now, sys can’t believe it, he just can’t believe trump had affair over ten years ago while his third wife was down the hall.

tenor.gif
 
Can you believe that Trump was screwing a porn star, without protection, with a newlywed and infant son at home?

Just for kicks, I wanna see if this will generate another dozen posts defending, attacking, bitching over such a basic, objective, obvious point. He had Bill Clinton's mistresses and accusers in the front row of a presidential debate (a move that frankly, I admire) but we can't bring up the stormy context. Sigh.
 
Just for kicks, I wanna see if this will generate another dozen posts defending, attacking, bitching over such a basic, objective, obvious point. He had Bill Clinton's mistresses and accusers in the front row of a presidential debate (a move that frankly, I admire) but we can't bring up the stormy context. Sigh.
Did Trump sexually assault Stormy? I'm sure you won't understand why that might be important in your comparison, but thought I'd ask.
 
Just for kicks, I wanna see if this will generate another dozen posts defending, attacking, bitching over such a basic, objective, obvious point. He had Bill Clinton's mistresses and accusers in the front row of a presidential debate (a move that frankly, I admire) but we can't bring up the stormy context. Sigh.

Because accusers of rape and a porn Star a famous guy banged are exactly the same context? Snicker.
 

I contend that these are Bolshevik / Marxist revolutionary strategies, plus Leninist “agitation” (key word) strategies — all from the various handbooks and manuals.

These strategies were successfully used in Russia literally 100 years ago to topple an empire — and have been adapted to the American way of life and thinking with the help of Alinsky.

None of this stuff is new. But it’s mostly been erased from America’s conscious — the main history we are promoted today is World War Two.

But the Bolshevik revolution was only 20 years before WW2 (a mere dot) — and could be as epic, or even more in scope — because the effects of the Bolshevik revolution lasted well into the 1990s. Far beyond WW2.

And they seem to be back now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
Will she sue like the gay couple that was
refused service by the cake maker over religious beliefs? Will the board libs defend her right to be served and to not be be discriminated against? Or is it ok by board libs to discriminate based on color and what you do for a living?

I think you know how that’ll go.

For the record. I absolutely support the restaurant’s right to do this. The free market will determine if it was a wise move or not.
 
Well.. yeah. She supports and enables corruption, deception and destroying families. Americans aren't gonna go, "That's okay Sarah, just keep it up."

Miller cant eat own eitherand Nielson has protesters outiside her house playing the tape of the little girl crying for her daddy.

Okay Don Quixote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HanAholeSolo2.0
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT