More On Climate Change
- Thread starter Ponca Dan
- Start date
Of course not. We're in the age of "climate change." It's the natural phenomenon that has occurred since the beginning of Earth but has recently only happened due to human activity. Since the dawn of humans, the climate has been static. Once humans figured out how to make use of carbon stores to produce energy, the climate started changing again. Once humans perish as a species, the climate will continue in its natural dynamic state.
Great reply! Succinct, concise, no hesitation, spoken with authority.
this short article pretty much confirms things....
The Arctic ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report to the Commerce Department yesterday from Consulafft, at Bergen, Norway.
Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone. Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes. Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm. Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared.
Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while vast shoals of herring and smelts which have never before ventured so far north, are being encountered in the old seal fishing grounds.
The Arctic ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report to the Commerce Department yesterday from Consulafft, at Bergen, Norway.
Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone. Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes. Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm. Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared.
Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while vast shoals of herring and smelts which have never before ventured so far north, are being encountered in the old seal fishing grounds.
NASA sees the climate cooling. Your article sees it warming. What’re we supposed to think?
Well first... think. There's another thread where I finally took the time to look at one of your talking points and you disappear when it's disproved. Instead go start up another thread. Why don't you employ common sense?
Think? What does that even mean? NASA says it’s cooling. As memmet would ask, is NASA lying? Is NASA corrupt? Has NASA been bought off by global cooling alarmists? You seem to think you know all the answers, better even than NASA. So which is it, are humans destroying the planet by causing things to get cooler or warmer?
Last edited:
oh, I forgot to mention...that article was from 1922. Sorry.
And the abacus was their computer model. The key to their predictions was interpreting how the beads lined up on their wires.
Ponca Dan, I would assume if anyone else said that they were being sarcastic, but with you it is hard to tell sometimes.
Go back and read your links, It is specifically about the layer of atmosphere that is difficult to distinguish from space, the thermosphere.
Sorry, I was trying to imitate Bill Burr. (Oh! Now I get it!) You'll need to explain to me what your point is. NASA says that layer will cause the earth to cool. Unfortunately for the alarmists it's the sun's fault, not humans.
Did we read the same article? "We see a cooling trend," was one of the first quotes by a NASA spokesperson in the article.
How often do you do Bill Burr?
He, Sebastian Maniscalco, Tom Segura, and Joe Rogan are my current favorites. Burr has got staying power. I'll try try to read you more with his voice inflection.
Seems awfully convenient that now there is a built-in random variable that can be used to justify any temperature variations (even global cooling) while still alarming about Man's carbon footprint. That said, the article clearly infers global cooling. Here is the quote from your story: "But that appears to be where the good news ends, unless you prefer cold weather and increased space junk." Unless you prefer cold weather is pretty succinct.
That's an editorial comment. Not NASA.
But yes believe it or not climate is determined by more than man's carbon footprint.
The magnitude of the cooling is immaterial. Cooling is the opposite of warming. We apparently are not in danger of global warming, which is what all the fuss has been about.
That’s nonsense. NASA wouldn’t say they see a cooling trend if they saw a warming trend. At least I don’t think they would!
I think you’re missing the big picture here. The global warming alarmists have failed virtually every prediction they have made. They’ve been caught doctoring evidence, they’ve resorted to fascist-style attempts to silence the “deniers.” Global warming alarmists have become yesterday’s news. It’s time for you to jump ship and get on the global cooling bandwagon. That’s the future for all collectivist environmental action!
Yes but NASA is only saying they see a cooling trend in the ..... Thermosphere
Did the jetsons live in the thermosphere and if so, why did Obama fly to Hawaii and why does @davidallen drive a full size pick up? The answers are like your anal beads. We know they are in there but it will hurt pulling them out.
@JimmyBob ’s neighbor
@JimmyBob ’s neighbor
