Milo to be on Real Time this Friday.

[Headhunter]

This could get really interesting. I've avoided Real Time since it came back on. I actually think Bill Maher can be very funny but I'm so tired of the over the top hysteria over Trump that I just couldn't bring myself to watch. But I'll be watching this weekend it should be a very interesting interview.

http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2017/02/15/milo-feature-fridays-real-time-bill-maher/

 

[HighStickHarry]

The stacked leftist crowd will have their fangs out

 

[MegaPoke]

The stacked leftist crowd will have their fangs out

Just the way he likes it.

 

[HighStickHarry]

Good point

 

[CBradSmith]

I'm actually pretty excited about this one.

 

[NZ Poke]

What percentage of people enraged by Milo have actually listened to him speak? I would say less than 3%.

This is classic:

 

[NZ Poke]

 

[AC_Exotic]

He was below average.

I'd much rather see Ben Shapiro invade Bill Maher's safe space.

 

[squeak]

I wasn't impressed. He's better than that.

Question, what is ok after society accepts trannies as normal? Beastiality? Pedophilia? Where does it stop?

 

[CowboyJD]

He was below average.

I'd much rather see Ben Shapiro invade Bill Maher's safe space.

I wasn't impressed. He's better than that.

Question, what is ok after society accepts trannies as normal? Beastiality? Pedophilia? Where does it stop?

Maybe he is just below average when against a decent debater with knowledge of the facts instead an overmatched shill.

I find him entertaining when he is interviewed and can say whatever he wants, but he struggles when called out by a strong orator that doesn't let him dominate the discussion like he prefers.

 

[Headhunter]

Maybe he is just below average when against a decent debater with knowledge of the facts instead an overmatched shill.

I find him entertaining when he is interviewed and can say whatever he wants, but he struggles when called out by a strong orator that doesn't let him dominate the discussion like he prefers.

Did you watch, I didn't think Maher was particularly sharp either. I thought both people were trying to be a little edgy without getting into a knock down, drag out.

 

[AC_Exotic]

Maybe he is just below average when against a decent debater with knowledge of the facts instead an overmatched shill.

I find him entertaining when he is interviewed and can say whatever he wants, but he struggles when called out by a strong orator that doesn't let him dominate the discussion like he prefers.

I've never been impressed with Milo.

He's perfect for post-fact America, however.

 

[CowboyJD]

Did you watch, I didn't think Maher was particularly sharp either. I thought both people were trying to be a little edgy without getting into a knock down, drag out.

I did watch, but I'm talking more about the Overtime segment than the interview with Maher.

 

[squeak]

I did watch, but I'm talking more about the Overtime segment than the interview with Maher.

Calling people stupid is stupid. I was disappointed when he did that.

 

[cableok]

Calling people stupid is stupid. I was disappointed when he did that.

I agree with you, however, this time it worked and certainly exposed Wilmore. Wilmore couldn't control himself and his only response was to tell Milo to "go f$?& yourself". Not too many talking heads I loath as much as Wilmore. Pretty obvious to see why he got canned from his own show.

 

[CowboyJD]

I agree with you, however, this time it worked and certainly exposed Wilmore. Wilmore couldn't control himself and his only response was to tell Milo to "go f$?& yourself". Not too many talking heads I loath as much as Wilmore. Pretty obvious to see why he got canned from his own show.

That's all Milo's attack deserved.

How did it "work"?

Milo resorts to taunts instead of actual debate. Wilmore tells him to stick that where the sun doesn't shine and Milo backs off.

I would say that Milo is one of the few people that make Wilmore come off as the sympathetic one.

 

[ThorOdinson13]

I was interested to see this because I wanted to see how he did against someone that could hold their own. It was underwhelming. He needs practice

 

[cableok]

That's all Milo's attack deserved.

How did it "work"?

Milo resorts to taunts instead of actual debate. Wilmore tells him to stick that where the sun doesn't shine and Milo backs off.

I would say that Milo is one of the few people that make Wilmore come off as the sympathetic one.

First, I am not at all on the side of Milo. He just says over-the-top aggressive inflammatory statements to get attention... in that vein he is similar to Wilmore. Although Milo's antics are good at exposing hypocrisy on the left.

Telling someone to f-themselves is not debating. Wilmore tried the tired and lazing argument tactic of attempting to throw race in every argument. Wilmore, like Toure, Deray McKesson, Van Jones, and Al Sharpton have one trick and that is to race-bait.

 

[NZ Poke]

Did you watch, I didn't think Maher was particularly sharp either. I thought both people were trying to be a little edgy without getting into a knock down, drag out.

Think of it like the first round of a boxing match when two talented fighters feel each other out and don't do much.

I like Bill Maher and I like Milo.

 

[NZ Poke]

First, I am not at all on the side of Milo. He just says over-the-top aggressive inflammatory statements to get attention... in that vein he is similar to Wilmore.

That's all Milo does? I would say he does that sometimes, but he can also intellectually shred people.

Some examples.....

 

[cableok]

That's all Milo does? I would say he does that sometimes, but he can also intellectually shred people.

Some examples.....

View embedded media

There are several political items that I agree with him. Especially when he calls out the silly PC-culture and leftist hypocrisy. But he should just allow his superior footing on arguments to win debates instead of name-calling, which he does a lot. It makes him no better than a Wilmore, IMO.

 

[NZ Poke]

View embedded media

View embedded media

In less than 48 hours, these two Youtube videos have a combined 5 million views.

From briefly scanning through the comments, about 80% seem to be pro-Milo.

Considering the overwhelming majority of US counties voted Trump (2623 counties Trump vs 489 counties Hillary), the GOP crushed the Democrats even more on the state level......and Marine Le Pen is likely going to win the French election........I'm starting to wonder how much leftist support there truly is anywhere.

 

[NZ Poke]

It's almost like the establishment left has manufactured a fake reality.

One example after another in this clip:

 

[CowboyJD]

First, I am not at all on the side of Milo. He just says over-the-top aggressive inflammatory statements to get attention... in that vein he is similar to Wilmore. Although Milo's antics are good at exposing hypocrisy on the left.

Telling someone to f-themselves is not debating. Wilmore tried the tired and lazing argument tactic of attempting to throw race in every argument. Wilmore, like Toure, Deray McKesson, Van Jones, and Al Sharpton have one trick and that is to race-bait.

Sure sounds like you're taking Milo's side with him all exposing Wilmore and what not.

Telling someone they are stupid is debating either. You know what else it isn't...."exposing" someone.

 

[MegaPoke]

In less than 48 hours, these two Youtube videos have a combined 5 million views.

From briefly scanning through the comments, about 80% seem to be pro-Milo.

Considering the overwhelming majority of US counties voted Trump (2623 counties Trump vs 489 counties Hillary), the GOP crushed the Democrats even more on the state level......and Marine Le Pen is likely going to win the French election........I'm starting to wonder how much leftist support there truly is anywhere.

Good question.

It's clustered in the urban areas of the Clinton Archipelago -weakened by the brilliant forethought of the electoral college system. And even then if it was truly motivated, Hillary would've generated better turnout.

The "progressive left" is little more than a stalking horse for globalist interests (i.e. George Soros and his ilk) Over represented by the globalist media at every opportunity.

There is a purpose behind the desperate tactics being taken to undermine Trump - and it ain't because he a nazi or a threat to the First Amendment.

 

[cableok]

Sure sounds like you're taking Milo's side with him all exposing Wilmore and what not.

Telling someone they are stupid is debating either. You know what else it isn't...."exposing" someone.

You are reading something into my reply that isn't there.

I meant I am not a Milo groupie or follower. However, Milo debating or arguing against Wilmore ... I am certain I would agree with Milo most every time. Wilmore is exposed in many discussions and in this instance it shows how when triggered he lacks thought and has to resort with telling Milo to f-himself.

I absolutely believe Wilmore, and others like him that I listed above, do get "exposed" when on a panel that includes others that can provide intelligent ideas that don't pander to the hard-left. Wilmore is comfortable when he can spew his race-baiting viewpoints amongst those with agree with him or on his failed show.

 

[CowboyJD]

You are reading something into my reply that isn't there.

I meant I am not a Milo groupie or follower. However, Milo debating or arguing against Wilmore ... I am certain I would agree with Milo most every time. Wilmore is exposed in many discussions and in this instance it shows how when triggered he lacks thought and has to resort with telling Milo to f-himself.

I absolutely believe Wilmore, and others like him that I listed above, do get "exposed" when on a panel that includes others that can provide intelligent ideas that don't pander to the hard-left. Wilmore is comfortable when he can spew his race-baiting viewpoints amongst those with agree with him or on his failed show.

Not reading anything into it. You're still doing.

Milo name calling (which is exactly when Wilmore told him to go $&@? himself) somehow is characterized as "intelligent ideas" exposing and triggering Wilmore and him "having to resort" to telling him to f-himself.

"Go f-yourself" was a perfectly appropriate response to what Milo was saying directly to him at the time. What Milo was doing at the time wasn't intelligent ideas, it wasn't debate, it was a direct personal attack and it got one right back.

 

[cableok]

Not reading anything into it. You're still doing.

Milo name calling (which is exactly when Wilmore told him to go $&@? himself) somehow is characterized as "intelligent ideas" exposing and triggering Wilmore and him "having to resort" to telling him to f-himself.

"Go f-yourself" was a perfectly appropriate response to what Milo was saying directly to him at the time. What Milo was doing at the time wasn't intelligent ideas, it wasn't debate, it was a direct personal attack and it got one right back.

You are struggling following here. But I will be clear and direct. I may not be a Milo fan, but I strongly dislike Wilmore. He, IMO, is a one-note hack.

I also strongly disagree with you that"go f-yourself" was any sort of an appropriate response for anything Milo had said. Again, Wilmore had nothing intelligent to say.

 

[CowboyJD]

You are struggling following here. But I will be clear and direct. I may not be a Milo fan, but I strongly dislike Wilmore. He, IMO, is a one-note hack.

I also strongly disagree with you that"go f-yourself" was any sort of an appropriate response for anything Milo had said. Again, Wilmore had nothing intelligent to say.

I'm not struggling following at all.

You're dismissing Milo's name calling and even recharacterizing it as something else BECAUSE you dislike Wilmore so much.

It's clear and obvious in every post you made.

 

[cableok]

I'm not struggling following at all.

You're dismissing Milo's name calling and even recharacterizing it as something else BECAUSE you dislike Wilmore so much.

It's clear and obvious in every post you made.

I definitely dislike Wilmore. That you understand correctly.

However, I never recharacterized Milo's name-calling. He called Wilmore and Nance stupid. He should not have. I said that in the first four words of my first post in this thread.

Remember, Nance alluded to Milo belonging to a Nazi group just before Milo said stupid. Or did you forget that? In any event, one, or two, or three wrongs don't make it right. And labeling Whitmore's response as appropriate ... well is just wrong. Unless, of course, you agree with me that Whitmore is a one-trick pony and that was the only response he could muster.

 

[CowboyJD]

I definitely dislike Wilmore. That you understand correctly.

However, I never recharacterized Milo's name-calling. He called Wilmore and Nance stupid. He should not have. I said that in the first four words of my first post in this thread.

Remember, Nance alluded to Milo belonging to a Nazi group just before Milo said stupid. Or did you forget that? In any event, one, or two, or three wrongs don't make it right. And labeling Whitmore's response as appropriate ... well is just wrong. Unless, of course, you agree with me that Whitmore is a one-trick pony and that was the only response he could muster.

I could quote the other ways you referred to Milo's actions....in fact I already have. It's right there to see.

One good insult deserves another.....that's it, that's all.

He doesn't have any need to muster anything else. Why should he muster a reasoned, polite response to an direct personal attack? He gave as good as he got in kind.