ADVERTISEMENT

Mary Jane Sessions

Been Jammin

Moderator
Moderator
Jun 27, 2003
62,137
46,892
113
AP NewsBreak: US to end policy that let legal pot flourish
By SADIE GURMAN
22 minutes ago


WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General Jeff Sessions is rescinding the Obama-era policy that had paved the way for legalized marijuana to flourish in states across the country, two people with knowledge of the decision told The Associated Press. Sessions will instead let federal prosecutors where pot is legal decide how aggressively to enforce federal marijuana law, the people said.

The people familiar with the plan spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it before an announcement expected Thursday.

The move by President Donald Trump’s attorney general likely will add to confusion about whether it’s OK to grow, buy or use marijuana in states where pot is legal, since long-standing federal law prohibits it. It comes days after pot shops opened in California, launching what is expected to become the world’s largest market for legal recreational marijuana and as polls show a solid majority of Americans believe the drug should be legal.

While Sessions has been carrying out a Justice Department agenda that follows Trump’s top priorities on such issues as immigration and opioids, the changes to pot policy reflect his own concerns. Trump’s personal views on marijuana remain largely unknown.

Sessions, who has assailed marijuana as comparable to heroin and has blamed it for spikes in violence, had been expected to ramp up enforcement. Pot advocates argue that legalizing the drug eliminates the need for a black market and would likely reduce violence, since criminals would no longer control the marijuana trade.

The Obama administration in 2013 announced it would not stand in the way of states that legalize marijuana, so long as officials acted to keep it from migrating to places where it remained outlawed and out of the hands of criminal gangs and children. Sessions is rescinding that memo, written by then-Deputy Attorney General James M. Cole, which had cleared up some of the uncertainty about how the federal government would respond as states began allowing sales for recreational and medical purposes.

The pot business has since become a sophisticated, multimillion-dollar industry that helps fund schools, educational programs and law enforcement. Eight states and the District of Columbia have legalized marijuana for recreational use, and California’s sales alone are projected to bring in $1 billion annually in tax revenue within several years.

Sessions’ policy will let U.S. attorneys across the country decide what kinds of federal resources to devote to marijuana enforcement based on what they see as priorities in their districts, the people familiar with the decision said.

Sessions and some law enforcement officials in states such as Colorado blame legalization for a number of problems, including drug traffickers that have taken advantage of lax marijuana laws to hide in plain sight, illegally growing and shipping the drug across state lines, where it can sell for much more. The decision was a win for pot opponents who had been urging Sessions to take action.

“There is no more safe haven with regard to the federal government and marijuana, but it’s also the beginning of the story and not the end,” said Kevin Sabet, president and CEO of Smart Approaches to Marijuana, who was among several anti-marijuana advocates who met with Sessions last month. “This is a victory. It’s going to dry up a lot of the institutional investment that has gone toward marijuana in the last five years.”

Threats of a federal crackdown have united liberals who object to the human costs of a war on pot with conservatives who see it as a states’ rights issue. Some in law enforcement support a tougher approach, but a bipartisan group of senators in March urged Sessions to uphold existing marijuana policy. Others in Congress have been seeking ways to protect and promote legal pot businesses.

A task force Sessions convened to study pot policy made no recommendations for upending the legal industry but instead encouraged Justice Department officials to keep reviewing the Obama administration’s more hands-off approach to marijuana enforcement, something Sessions promised to do since he took office.

The change also reflects yet another way in which Sessions, who served as a federal prosecutor at the height of the drug war in Mobile, Alabama, has reversed Obama-era criminal justice policies that aimed to ease overcrowding in federal prisons and contributed to a rethinking of how drug criminals were prosecuted and sentenced. While his Democratic predecessor Eric Holder told federal prosecutors to avoid seeking long mandatory minimum sentences when charging certain lower level drug offenders, for example, Sessions issued an order demanding the opposite, telling them to pursue the most serious charges possible against most suspects.
 
So the Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice is actually going to enforce the federal laws enacted by prior congresses and approved by prior Presidents? shocking

How about we actually change the law if we don't like it instead of ignoring it? It becomes quite confusing if we get to choose to ignore some laws but not others.
 
So the Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice is actually going to enforce the federal laws enacted by prior congresses and approved by prior Presidents? shocking

How about we actually change the law if we don't like it instead of ignoring it? It becomes quite confusing if we get to choose to ignore some laws but not others.
I think it’s hard to change the law because we have agreements with foreign governments requiring us to keep it a schedule 1. Just what I’ve heard. Anyone know anything more, or do I have to use Google?
 
So the Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice is actually going to enforce the federal laws enacted by prior congresses and approved by prior Presidents? shocking

How about we actually change the law if we don't like it instead of ignoring it? It becomes quite confusing if we get to choose to ignore some laws but not others.

While I agree with this in principle, in practice, this is effectively closing the barn door long after the horses have vacated.

Follow the money. The massive flow of cash in this situation is ripe for corruption and manipulation.

This guarantees that the MJ biz will remain cash only and it guarantees that a lot of people will need local transactions that can launder a crap ton of cash.

There may be other options but real estate is going to get even more interesting in CA in the next 6 months.
 
I think it’s hard to change the law because we have agreements with foreign governments requiring us to keep it a schedule 1. Just what I’ve heard. Anyone know anything more, or do I have to use Google?

This is correct. We're part of treaties with the rest of the civilized world to keep pot illegal. From day 1 it's been stupid for the states not to decriminalize it rather than making it legal. Morons
 
And regards to abolishing black markets, am I supposed to believe that underage people magically stopped smoking it where it's legal?
 
I'm pro national legalization. The issue with a legal state like Colorado surrounded by non-legal states is that both legal and illicit marijuana products from Colorado are flooding into non-legal states. A couple from Norman was arrested in Texas last April with 10 pounds of illicitly grown Colorado marijuana and other marijuana products while on they were on their way back to Norman where they sold it to high school and college kids. BTW, when arrested, they were both high on their own supply with their toddler in the back seat. Nothing like the cover of "family" for drug trafficking.

Now of course marijuana comes to Norman through other avenues, but marijuana edibles and oil to make edibles typically does not. It isn't the green that was so alarming. How marketable and disguisable the edibles are was.

If border-like check points were set up on every road leaving Colorado today, I firmly believe the amount of marijuana products found leaving Colorado would even alarm the enthusiasts. Colorado is having a hell of a time policing the marijuana. It seems that instead of eliminating the marijuana black market, Colorado has become the marijuana black market.
 
No, but I'd argue it's easier to get pot as a high schooler consistently than it is to get alcohol.
This. There's no money in buying alcohol for minors. Selling them marijuana on the other hand...
 
image.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
So the Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice is actually going to enforce the federal laws enacted by prior congresses and approved by prior Presidents? shocking

How about we actually change the law if we don't like it instead of ignoring it? It becomes quite confusing if we get to choose to ignore some laws but not others.
#statesrights .... am I right?
 
Am I the only one who thinks Jeff Sessions looks and sounds like a complete blithering idiot? How could that man win an election for dog catcher, much less US Senate? The fact that DJT put him on as Attorney General tells you all you need to know about DJT. Can I get an AMEN!!?
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_xl72qcu5isp39
Am I the only one who thinks Jeff Sessions looks and sounds like a complete blithering idiot? How could that man win an election for dog catcher, much less US Senate? The fact that DJT put him on as Attorney General tells you all you need to know about DJT. Can I get an AMEN!!?

No. He's absolutely cringe worthy in congressional hearings.

Not exactly new with DJT though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: windriverrange
Am I the only one who thinks Jeff Sessions looks and sounds like a complete blithering idiot? How could that man win an election for dog catcher, much less US Senate? The fact that DJT put him on as Attorney General tells you all you need to know about DJT. Can I get an AMEN!!?
Amen brother. For now at least. On this topic, you got me?
 
Am I the only one who thinks Jeff Sessions looks and sounds like a complete blithering idiot? How could that man win an election for dog catcher, much less US Senate? The fact that DJT put him on as Attorney General tells you all you need to know about DJT. Can I get an AMEN!!?


I'm 100% for legalizing weed --- it's far less harmful than the majority of sugary GMO "food" lining our supermarket shelves. (Especially if you vape it)


In fact, CBD (which isn't psychoactive) is being shown to have some almost miraculous medical properties.


But isn't legalization supposed to come from Congress? Rather than the federal government selectivity enforcing laws.....


It seems like our biggest problem is the elites getting their own personal legal system.
 
I'm pro national legalization. The issue with a legal state like Colorado surrounded by non-legal states is that both legal and illicit marijuana products from Colorado are flooding into non-legal states. A couple from Norman was arrested in Texas last April with 10 pounds of illicitly grown Colorado marijuana and other marijuana products while on they were on their way back to Norman where they sold it to high school and college kids. BTW, when arrested, they were both high on their own supply with their toddler in the back seat. Nothing like the cover of "family" for drug trafficking.

Now of course marijuana comes to Norman through other avenues, but marijuana edibles and oil to make edibles typically does not. It isn't the green that was so alarming. How marketable and disguisable the edibles are was.

If border-like check points were set up on every road leaving Colorado today, I firmly believe the amount of marijuana products found leaving Colorado would even alarm the enthusiasts. Colorado is having a hell of a time policing the marijuana. It seems that instead of eliminating the marijuana black market, Colorado has become the marijuana black market.

Or maybe you should quit being so uptight, light one, make money, and enjoy some freedom. You people always have to tell people what they can and can't do. This state is a shithole and a fraction of the $ Colorado is making would be a godsend here. But no - we'll be the last to open up while other states make money.
 
Or maybe you should quit being so uptight, light one, make money, and enjoy some freedom. You people always have to tell people what they can and can't do. This state is a shithole and a fraction of the $ Colorado is making would be a godsend here. But no - we'll be the last to open up while other states make money.
Good lord you're an absolute, complete dumbass. Like retarded at the basic cellular anatomy level dumbass. Cytoplasmretardulum. Mitotardia. Tardosomes. Cell tardbranes. Tardleus.

I'm pro national legalization.
 
Last edited:
War on drugs has failed period. Time to find a more nuanced way to deal with weed then turning the clock backwards. I'm for letting states decide if they want to legalize it or not, but trying to stop the growing, selling and usage of weed is like asking the uo band never to play boomer shitbag again. The enforcement is a waste of money, time and public resources that could be better used for schools, mental health issues even infrastructure plus you remove the criminal element that has grown hideously rich and caused untold misery and death across the Americas.

This is a giant loser for Trump and he needs to reign Sessions in or fire him and find someone who can work with a vision for the future and not someone who wants to claw their way back to the 50's, 60's, 70's and so on.
 
Give people the right to grow their own for personal consumption.

I'm all for legalization but I hate this idea. I don't have to grow my own tomatoes in order to eat them. The whole idea of commerce is that I exchange the services (and the money I earn from it) that I'm good at for goods and services from others who are better at their services. This goes completely against any modern commerce model.
 
I'm all for legalization but I hate this idea. I don't have to grow my own tomatoes in order to eat them. The whole idea of commerce is that I exchange the services (and the money I earn from it) that I'm good at for goods and services from others who are better at their services. This goes completely against any modern commerce model.
That's your choice. It's a weed and will grow almost anywhere without much attention and costs. There are many people who would grow their own if allowed. The taxing authorities and businesses wouldn't like it but that's the definition of true freedom.

While in college I grew several plants in my dad's greenhouse until he found them. The greenhouse still exists as do all the grow lights he used with his orchids. I bet my mother would also water them especially if I told her they were peach trees.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rdcldad
I'm all for legalization but I hate this idea. I don't have to grow my own tomatoes in order to eat them. The whole idea of commerce is that I exchange the services (and the money I earn from it) that I'm good at for goods and services from others who are better at their services. This goes completely against any modern commerce model.
Marijuana should be treated no differently than alcohol. I can buy alcohol commercially. I can also legally make up to 200 gallons of beer and wine per year. I can't distill legally, but that's probably for the best because of the risks involved if you don't know what you're doing.
 
Marijuana should be treated no differently than alcohol. I can buy alcohol commercially. I can also legally make up to 200 gallons of beer and wine per year. I can't distill legally, but that's probably for the best because of the risks involved if you don't know what you're doing.

I agree completely. I agree that people should have the right to grow their own. I just don't believe that should be the only 'legal' ownership option.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT