ADVERTISEMENT

Mark Zuckerberg

NZ Poke

Heisman Candidate
Dec 16, 2007
6,088
7,047
113
v91euoy3fao01.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
I find it amazing that people are genuinely shocked that Facebook collects all this data on their customers.
The shock is that my friends can consent to give away my data, to Cambridge Analytica or Obama.

Also I am genuinely shocked that keeps a record of your cellphone calls if you are on Android.
 
It was acceptable when FB gave this same data directly to the Obama campaign in '12. Heck, they didn't even charge for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
No it wasn't.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018...ampaign-constitute-violation-federal-law.html

Ignore the campaign finance law portion of this post, which I really don't want this to diverge into. How is the data provided by Facebook directly to Obama different from the data provided by the 3rd party to the Trump campaign, other than one acquired it via 3rd party and questionable means and the other received it as a gift of support? How is the data itself different?
 
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018...ampaign-constitute-violation-federal-law.html

Ignore the campaign finance law portion of this post, which I really don't want this to diverge into. How is the data provided by Facebook directly to Obama different from the data provided by the 3rd party to the Trump campaign, other than one acquired it via 3rd party and questionable means and the other received it as a gift of support? How is the data itself different?
According to your link, Trump paid for his data.
 
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018...ampaign-constitute-violation-federal-law.html

Ignore the campaign finance law portion of this post, which I really don't want this to diverge into. How is the data provided by Facebook directly to Obama different from the data provided by the 3rd party to the Trump campaign, other than one acquired it via 3rd party and questionable means and the other received it as a gift of support? How is the data itself different?
Neither of the situations are OK. I don't blame Obama, CA, or Trump for taking the info I blame FB for allowing it.
 
Neither of the situations are OK. I don't blame Obama, CA, or Trump for taking the info I blame FB for allowing it.
While I agree with you, only one of the uses required Zuckerberg to do a world apology tour, so while you may not have agreed with Obama's use of the data, its clear that the media machine tacitly approved it.
 
While I agree with you, only one of the uses required Zuckerberg to do a world apology tour, so while you may not have agreed with Obama's use of the data, its clear that the media machine tacitly approved it.
Wasn't the Obama use of data revealed just recently as well?
 
there is no telling what kind of kickback nobama promised them....somewhere somehow he made promises. No way he didn't. There is always a hand out from even these characters. A hand out wanting something in return.
 
there is no telling what kind of kickback nobama promised them....somewhere somehow he made promises. No way he didn't. There is always a hand out from even these characters. A hand out wanting something in return.
nobama just used Facebook in a way anyone with a Facebook app in 2012 could have used it. The problem isn't political corruption, the problem is that it doesn't even take political corruption to get your data without your consent.
 
nobama just used Facebook in a way anyone with a Facebook app in 2012 could have used it. The problem isn't political corruption, the problem is that it doesn't even take political corruption to get your data without your consent.
when you're meeting and toasting with the owner of facebook I would wager it goes deeper than that.
 
when you're meeting and toasting with the owner of facebook I would wager it goes deeper than that.
So weird that POTUS would meet with business leaders. Also quite strange that he would do he is nefarious dealings in a group setting rather than one on one. Even more eerie, he had a photographer document the occasion. Where there is smoke there is fire.
 
There is no reason or evidence out there at all that would lead us to call to question Obama's motives.
There is no question about the motives. He/his campaign wanted facebook data to target facebook users so he could win the 2012 election. His campaign, and probably hundreds if not thousand of entities were able to scrape this data while fully complying with facebook's TOCs. This is bad.

I swear, if Obama admitted to personally doing Benghazi to further his goal of a worldwide caliphate, some of you would be on here spinning your wheels connecting the dots trying to link a worldwide caliphate to Marxism and the gulags to prove once and for all that Obama is indeed bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CowboyJD
that's what I do...promote the truth!! Anyway, who is spinning? I am guaranteeing there was some hokey pokey going on. But, no need to talk about nobama as he is meaningless anymore. It's just going to take years to unravel all the damage he did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT