ADVERTISEMENT

Liberals pick this guy apart

He is obviously wrong. How can we change his mind?


Hard to take anyone who props up Alex Jones as the “real deal” very seriously.

Also, don’t you agree it’s highly naive to believe Tatum didn’t have a leg up on getting a job with the Tucson Police Department after playing collegiate football in Tucson, Arizona?
 
Hard to take anyone who props up Alex Jones as the “real deal” very seriously.

Also, don’t you agree it’s highly naive to believe Tatum didn’t have a leg up on getting a job with the Tucson Police Department after playing collegiate football in Tucson, Arizona?

And I thought it was the protesters who were the “violent” ones?

 
Larry Elder the permatriggered haha. “Don Lemon called me an Uncle Tom”. No he didn’t, Larry...you gave yourself that moniker haha.

Life is rough for you isn’t it?

Have to love how you take implications and run with them when they fit your world view but ignore them all together when they don’t.

You know, like calling @HanAholeSolo2.0 a racist.
 
How opened minded of you to shut it down after a fact made you emotionally uncomfortable. So cliche.
Emotionally uncomfortable? Nothing you post really surprises me nor makes me uncomfortable.

Starting with the premise that 1860s legal interpretations are somehow relevant to today, that is enough for me to make a judgement. Now if your saying he did some brilliant reasoning later in this video, I will gladly give it a second chance, but there are only so many minutes in the day and I have given you more than you deserve already.
 
Emotionally uncomfortable? Nothing you post really surprises me nor makes me uncomfortable.

Starting with the premise that 1860s legal interpretations are somehow relevant to today, that is enough for me to make a judgement. Now if your saying he did some brilliant reasoning later in this video, I will gladly give it a second chance, but there are only so many minutes in the day and I have given you more than you deserve already.

So 1860 legal interpretation should be held to todays standards because ........?

You know, maybe we should talk slavery today, in our time. It still occurs, it’s still sanctioned by certain groups. Let’s talk about that.
 
So 1860 legal interpretation should be held to todays standards because ........?

You know, maybe we should talk slavery today, in our time. It still occurs, it’s still sanctioned by certain groups. Let’s talk about that.

That’s weird...somehow the 2nd amendment is exempt from this in so many great minds on this board lol
 
So 1860 legal interpretation should be held to todays standards because ........?

You know, maybe we should talk slavery today, in our time. It still occurs, it’s still sanctioned by certain groups. Let’s talk about that.
Lets do... start the thread and I will contribute.

As to this person beginning his speech by highlighting the legality of slavery in the 1860s - WTF does that have to do with anything? Was it justified? Moral? Did it have lasting social consequences? If he goes on to make some of those points then it might be worth a listen, but no he jumps from that assertion to his job on police force. Enough. I don't suffer fools (much - well I guess I do spend a lot of time here).
 
Lets do... start the thread and I will contribute.

As to this person beginning his speech by highlighting the legality of slavery in the 1860s - WTF does that have to do with anything? Was it justified? Moral? Did it have lasting social consequences? If he goes on to make some of those points then it might be worth a listen, but no he jumps from that assertion to his job on police force. Enough. I don't suffer fools (much - well I guess I do spend a lot of time here).

It’s a typical liberal tactic to kick the rock at the base of the mountain without looking up at the actual mountain. This guy blows up everything you believe in but you stop and do twirls on one sentence.
 
It’s a typical liberal tactic to kick the rock at the base of the mountain without looking up at the actual mountain. This guy blows up everything you believe in but you stop and do twirls on one sentence.

They couldn't define what 'societal progress' was either. Language is where liberals operate in darkness.
 
That’s weird...somehow the 2nd amendment is exempt from this in so many great minds on this board lol

You’re just not very bright

When the second amendment was written the populace had the same weapons as soldiers.

We do not have the same weapons as soldiers today
 
Proof of confiscating everyone’s guns? Ohhh you’re just a big bag of hot air lol.
"The poll does, however, show surprisingly robust support for Second Amendment repeal (39 percent) among Democrats (by contrast, 8 percent of Republicans would support a full repeal)."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...national-survey-finds/?utm_term=.ae74c04d9930

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/03/27/opinion/john-paul-stevens-repeal-second-amendment.html

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a19604852/democrats-repeal-second-amendment/

https://townhall.com/notebook/bethb...ea-of-repealing-the-second-amendment-n2450738


I could do this all day, ToonTard, but I think I made my point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrunkenViking
381ecf89568a47c660f72665685f5108.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: HighStickHarry
"The poll does, however, show surprisingly robust support for Second Amendment repeal (39 percent) among Democrats (by contrast, 8 percent of Republicans would support a full repeal)."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...national-survey-finds/?utm_term=.ae74c04d9930

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/03/27/opinion/john-paul-stevens-repeal-second-amendment.html

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a19604852/democrats-repeal-second-amendment/

https://townhall.com/notebook/bethb...ea-of-repealing-the-second-amendment-n2450738


I could do this all day, ToonTard, but I think I made my point.

Got it...you’re permatriggered by over-the-top rhetoric lol. When the 2nd amendment gets repealed, be sure and wake me up lol.
 
Got it...you’re permatriggered by over-the-top rhetoric lol. When the 2nd amendment gets repealed, be sure and wake me up lol.

Proof of confiscating everyone’s guns? Ohhh you’re just a big bag of hot air lol.

You asked. I delivered. Don't slobber on the messenger.

Of course It won't get repealed. This country hasn't become completely pussified.
 
You asked. I delivered. Don't slobber on the messenger.

Of course It won't get repealed. This country hasn't become completely pussified.

Exactly, yet you run with the narrative. Don’t get all pissy because I showed you how triggered you are by a few idiots. It shows that

1) you’re a lot more right than you want to put on, and...

2) you’re highly susceptible to propaganda.


Not a good look, Medic. Not at all haha
 
Exactly, yet you run with the narrative. Don’t get all pissy because I showed you how triggered you are by a few idiots. It shows that

1) you’re a lot more right than you want to put on, and...

2) you’re highly susceptible to propaganda.


Not a good look, Medic. Not at all haha
Huh? Wtf are you talking about? I said lefties that call Trump literally Hitler want him to take everyone's guns. You said what I interpreted as "show me proof (I don't speak tardlish, so that's the best I could come up with)." I posted a link to an article talking about a poll that shows that 39% of Democrats want the 2nd Amendment repealed. You know, those same people that say Trump is literally Hitler. I posted a few additional links of Democrats talking repeal. You've been having some sort of seizure ever since.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wyomingosualum
Huh? Wtf are you talking about? I said lefties that call Trump literally Hitler want him to take everyone's guns. You said what I interpreted as "show me proof (I don't speak tardlish, so that's the best I could come up with)." I posted a link to an article talking about a poll that shows that 39% of Democrats want the 2nd Amendment repealed. You know, those same people that say Trump is literally Hitler. I posted a few additional links of Democrats talking repeal. You've been having some sort of seizure ever since.

lol people call Trump Hitler for many reasons unrelated to gun control. You know this.
 
lol people call Trump Hitler for many reasons unrelated to gun control. You know this.
Uh huh, that's exactly my point ToonTard, and yet lefty dipshits want him to take everyone's guns.

I'm glad you finally used your abdominal ganglia to figure out this Houdini Pro level difficulty "riddle."
 
You got an example yet? I mean I did the heavy lifting for you but after that crickets. I am patient, take your time.

Plenty. And I and others have spoken to some.

Have you parameterized your definition of societal progress?
 
Plenty. And I and others have spoken to some.

Have you parameterized your definition of societal progress?
Yet, you presented something along the lines of "economics" and left it at that. Would really like to have that conversation with you.

Why do you want me to hem you in with my definition anyway? You're a big boy, use your own!
 
list them potato

- Demagoguery
- Evolving conservative viewpoint
- Mirroring campaign tactics, including constant jet-setting and personal attacks on opponents
- Ultra-nationalism with the rhetoric and actions to back it up
- Noted preference for immigrant origin and decreased immigration across the board
- Border wall, even going as far as lying about another country picking up the tab
- Substantial military buildup and spending
- Ardent support from industrialists, bankers and businessmen
- Adherence to autarky and rhetoric contained therein
- Antagonistic role with the media, including attempts to stifle opposition and negative criticism and longing for stronger libel law
- Demands for loyalty from colleagues and underlings
- Spoils system for those loyal to him, including high-ranking positions.


And plenty more...
 
- Demagoguery
- Evolving conservative viewpoint
- Mirroring campaign tactics, including constant jet-setting and personal attacks on opponents
- Ultra-nationalism with the rhetoric and actions to back it up
- Noted preference for immigrant origin and decreased immigration across the board
- Border wall, even going as far as lying about another country picking up the tab
- Substantial military buildup and spending
- Ardent support from industrialists, bankers and businessmen
- Adherence to autarky and rhetoric contained therein
- Antagonistic role with the media, including attempts to stifle opposition and negative criticism and longing for stronger libel law
- Demands for loyalty from colleagues and underlings
- Spoils system for those loyal to him, including high-ranking positions.


And plenty more...

lots of words and bullet points in there for sure

@HighStickHarry who is half a person smarter than you, said trump is lousy at fascisting though, so you better search the internet for more antifa buzzwords if you want to be convincing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HighStickHarry
lots of words and bullet points in there for sure

@HighStickHarry who is half a person smarter than you, said trump is lousy at fascisting though, so you better search the internet for more antifa buzzwords if you want to be convincing.

Lol...guess I’m wrong, if Harry said it haha. I thought you weren’t the Trumpet cheerleader type? Guess I’m wrong again!
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT