ADVERTISEMENT

Kushner the one?

What an amazingly difficult problem for DJT if that turns out to be true... assuming of course Jared did it without his knowledge. Interesting speculation if nothing else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GL97
Not difficult at all. That would be the ultimate betrayal and if trump is half as bad as you think he is "but daddy I love him" would not be enough to keep him off the bottom of the Hudson.
 
How do you feel about the defense the WH is floating? Putting McMasters out there is a smart move...
 
Do that smarmy thing where you link someone typing it in to google so we know what you are talking about.
I hurt your feelings didn't I?

In any case McMasters most credible, perceived least beholden to Kushner leading the "back channels with Russia are a good thing" chorus - best strategy yet in dealing with one of these. Does it save the baby daddy?
 
So does this mean the "Russians hacked the election to give Trump the win" and "Trump colluded with the Russians to win the election" didn't pan out? So, they come up with another steaming hot plate of crap to feed the mindless who only follow the news if it pops up on an app on their phone?
 
So does this mean the "Russians hacked the election to give Trump the win" and "Trump colluded with the Russians to win the election" didn't pan out? So, they come up with another steaming hot plate of crap to feed the mindless who only follow the news if it pops up on an app on their phone?
exactly...just another will goose chase. These dumbass's have nothing else.
 
So Kushner not a concern. Duly noted. Intercepts of communication between Russian Ambassador and Kremlin must be faked.

Even if he did ask for Russian supplied comms equip for back channel during transition it was only to MAGA. If he broke the law it want for nefariously reasons. (I actually kinda think this is the truth of it).
 
nothing will stick on the wall on this peep show.
 
nothing will stick on the wall on this peep show.
The info coming out is very specific. Names, dates, summaries of the report out on the content of the meetings. There is enough smoke here that I would not be surprised if there isn't something burning.

Kushner assisting Flynn in setting up an out of channel communication with Russian military and intelligence. If that chain of events proves out - would you have issues with his continuing role in the White House?
 
The info coming out is very specific. Names, dates, summaries of the report out on the content of the meetings. There is enough smoke here that I would not be surprised if there isn't something burning.

Kushner assisting Flynn in setting up an out of channel communication with Russian military and intelligence. If that chain of events proves out - would you have issues with his continuing role in the White House?

One

No offense taken. Help me out a bit and give me the last 3 or 4 that I jumped on if you will.
 
it's the same old song and dance. At some point the american people are going to revolt. This story is already losing traction even with all the buffed up bulls$$t.
 
So does this mean the "Russians hacked the election to give Trump the win" and "Trump colluded with the Russians to win the election" didn't pan out? So, they come up with another steaming hot plate of crap to feed the mindless who only follow the news if it pops up on an app on their phone?
They're going to have to add additional choices to this wheel...

excuse.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
it's the same old song and dance. At some point the american people are going to revolt. This story is already losing traction even with all the buffed up bulls$$t.
Already losing traction? Are you serious Clark? Which part of the story are you tagging as bulls$$t? Kurshners amended security application? The White House amending the list of people he met with during the transition? Just curious which "fake" fake news you are referring to.
 
it's fake on fake on fake...it's faked me out. Can we move on to something important. Doing these unimportant things so importantly for so long is very boring.
Pssst... I'll let you in on a secret. Derailing Trump actually IS the plan! Don't tell him though. If you do he might stop responding exactly the way we want him to.
 
Trump seems pretty derailed so far.

No funding for wall
No Obamacare repeal
No immigration EO in place
Special Counsel on Russia because Sessions had to recuse
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
Trump seems pretty derailed so far.

No funding for wall
No Obamacare repeal
No immigration EO in place
Special Counsel on Russia because Sessions had to recuse


No funding for wall- Silly waste of money. Symbolic gesture that won't accomplish a whole lot.

No Obamacare repeal- It is going to be tough to get this one done. Unless they replace it with something similar.

No immigration EO in place- Worthless waste of time. Accomplishes nothing at this point. I'm surprised that they are still pursuing this one. This is about nothing more than his supporters being able to claim a victory.

Special Counsel on Russia because Sessions had to recuse.
No idea if there really is/was something going on or if it is all a wild goose chase. Hopefully we find out the truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
Trump seems pretty derailed so far.

No funding for wall
No Obamacare repeal
No immigration EO in place
Special Counsel on Russia because Sessions had to recuse

we don't care about that crap...it's all going to be single source eventually anyway. We like the fact that the economy is better, businesses are active and taking chances, spending money, some kind of economic direction which was a dead spiral when the brainless wonder was in charge. We need to get a committee to pass all that stuff you mentioned and then have some low level bureaucrat get 'er done. Many more important things to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
No funding for wall- Silly waste of money. Symbolic gesture that won't accomplish a whole lot.
Speculation. Other countries have them and they function as a deterrent. We've never had one so it's tough to say what effect a wall will actually have. I'm not a fan of the potential ecological impact though.

That said, ridding our system of the idiotic catch and release is having good results. We're still in the infancy of actual border enforcement for the first time in a long time. I'm in favor of seeing the results of simply enforcing the law before we start using more extreme measures.
 
Speculation. Other countries have them and they function as a deterrent. We've never had one so it's tough to say what effect a wall will actually have. I'm not a fan of the potential ecological impact though.

That said, ridding our system of the idiotic catch and release is having good results. We're still in the infancy of actual border enforcement for the first time in a long time. I'm in favor of seeing the results of simply enforcing the law before we start using more extreme measures.

Agree.
 
yes, it's actually working. To have the wall or to not have the wall means nothing. Enforcing the law works great. Situation solved.
 
we don't care about that crap...it's all going to be single source eventually anyway. We like the fact that the economy is better, businesses are active and taking chances, spending money, some kind of economic direction which was a dead spiral when the brainless wonder was in charge. We need to get a committee to pass all that stuff you mentioned and then have some low level bureaucrat get 'er done. Many more important things to do.

We don't care about four of the major planks he ran on.

tenor.gif
 
We don't care about four of the major planks he ran on.

tenor.gif
Well for me, the major concern was protection of the 2nd Amendment, followed by border enforcement which led to not Hillary, followed by meaningful tax reform, some elimination of government waste, ACA replacement or enhancement to control these deductibles and premiums, and bolstering our military.

I'm not and never have been a wall fan for simple principles of ecology. I'm an animal lover, not of the PETA variety as I love to eat them, but of the how does a big wall harm animal migration patterns. I was and and still am an advocate of simply enforcing our laws. When you dangle immense incentive for illegals in the form of catch and release followed with providing financial benefits, don't stand up and tell me to my face that the amount of illegals crossing the southern border is a very difficult problem to solve. You're the one looking stupid, not me.

Supreme Court Justice sworn in. I like the pick.

Government waste and tax reform are animals that can't be handled by one guy, but I want him front and center beating the doors down. Mixed on this currently as not enough time to really evaluate.

ACA. F++ so far, but that's not solely on him. I'm really pissed at the lack of Republican effort and the lack of seeking bipartisan solutions from both sides. I've already decided I will not vote for any incumbent in any race in 2018. Too late to change my mind on that. Thoroughly dissatisfied with the state and federal congresses.

Military spending is a mix but I like the direction he's going.

Other than that I currently think he's a thin skinned little bitch and he better get back on track. I have enjoyed the shit show so far.
 
Sure does. But saying you're going to enforce the laws instead of presenting a stupid looking grin and promises of sanctuary has already had an effect. The problem is that likely the management folks have no idea what the law actually is since they've probably not seen it enforced in their careers. Draining that particular swamp will take some time, but it already looks better than it has.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Been Jammin
OK, I'm lost. After reading the original title of this thread,"Kushner the one?", is he now in charge of building the wall, repealing obamacare and creating an executive order on immigration?
But, as far as asking for a back channel, why ask for one if you're already colluding with them?
 
OK, I'm lost. After reading the original title of this thread,"Kushner the one?", is he now in charge of building the wall, repealing obamacare and creating an executive order on immigration?
But, as far as asking for a back channel, why ask for one if you're already colluding with them?
Hypothetically.... you know greater scrutiny is headed your way and you know that to continue the communication outside the purview of American intelligence you will need to step up your game. Add Flynn as the secondary actor and this is at least plausible but still improbable.

More likely you are just a dumbass who doesn't understand or like how things work in government.
 
Hypothetically.... you know greater scrutiny is headed your way and you know that to continue the communication outside the purview of American intelligence you will need to step up your game. Add Flynn as the secondary actor and this is at least plausible but still improbable.

More likely you are just a dumbass who doesn't understand or like how things work in government.
Name calling, awesome. You fit right in.
 
Upon reflection I would like to recharacterize my description of Jared Kushner he clearly is not a dumb ass. What is his Is an arrogant ass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT