Is this what surrender looks like?
- Thread starter CBradSmith
- Start date
Dear Mueller....
....Mueller.....Mueller...hahaha:
Here are your answers:
Never
Maybe
Nope
15th
Yuge
BJ and the Bear
Thank you,
President Trump
....Mueller.....Mueller...hahaha:
Here are your answers:
Never
Maybe
Nope
15th
Yuge
BJ and the Bear
Thank you,
President Trump
No that’s what a fair and measured exercise of investigative discretion looks like.
He wants him on the record. He’s not trying to set a perjury trap like MAGA-ites have been yelping about.
He wants him on the record. He’s not trying to set a perjury trap like MAGA-ites have been yelping about.
Last edited:
are you kidding me? LOL...no wait...RAFLMAO. Not at you JD but not recognizing what this means is surprising. On the record? Yea, that's it.
Triggered by facts not fitting your world view.
If this investigation actually was just a political “witch hunt”, Mueller would have subpoenaed Trump for the political capital of having that battle play out publicly.
From the article cited by Brad...
“While Mueller did not say if he was giving up on an interview altogether,.....”
“They did, however, offer written answers as a possibility, and the Mueller team appears receptive to it as an interim measure.”
So even takiking Brad’s article as 100% true...Mueller hasn’t “surrendered” anything.
“While Mueller did not say if he was giving up on an interview altogether,.....”
“They did, however, offer written answers as a possibility, and the Mueller team appears receptive to it as an interim measure.”
So even takiking Brad’s article as 100% true...Mueller hasn’t “surrendered” anything.
As someone who actually understands the probable cause requirement for a warrant and doesn’t buy into MAGA propaganda... it’s not hard to fathom at all.
i rest my case
now we watch mueller make every desperate attempt to make his
with absolutely zero on the line for the inquisitors and accusers
That’s the nature of every single criminal investigation in this great country of ours....you do understand the nature of prosecutorial discretion and immunity, right?
You don’t have to like it...you can whine about it all you want...but it is the law.
categorizing discussion as whining should be way beneath the standard you bring
I calls them as I sees them.
My loyalty is to the following of the law rather than any particular politician.
I agree as long as the law is just, lots of horrible actions have been taken that were completely legal at the time. The Law is an imperfect guide to a more civil society.
Reports are now that Mueller is insisting on a follow-up face to face interview following answers to the written questions proposed.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/mueller-...nterview-russia-probe-giuliani-003535457.html
So....doesn't look like "surrender"...at all.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/mueller-...nterview-russia-probe-giuliani-003535457.html
So....doesn't look like "surrender"...at all.
What happens when you manufacture evidence to produce probable cause?
If Trump gets called to testify I hope he pulls a Clinton and just can't remember anything.
Depends on what you mean by “manufacture”.
If by “manufacture” you mean knowingly provide false evidence....
If the evidence in the probable cause affidavit is untrue and law enforcement knew it was untrue or acted recklessly with regards to the truth of the evidence submitted, the subject of the prosecution can attempt to have the search warrant voided and have any evidence obtained as a result of the warrant suppressed in a criminal prosecution.
If by “manufacture” you mean someone paid an informant or other person to get the evidence....
Nothing happens...unless the above scenario comes into play...that the law enforcement signing the affidavit knew the evidence was untrue or acted recklessly with regards to its truth.
Then there is the additional question of whether there was sufficient evidence of probable cause in the affidavit without the alleged/challenged evidence. If there is, the warrant will still be valid. If there isn’t, it will be subject to voiding and suppression of the evidence seized as a result of the warrant.
jd still trying to make serious issues out of bull shit soup....forget about the law! It's politics.
I understand you contend there is an ongoing investigation into this.
If the first scenario did happen, I hope that investigation discovers that and reveals it to the American people.
Purkey still promoting the idea that politics and his boy is above the law.
Forget about the law? Are you fricking serious with this shit?
I was asked questions. I answered that question.
That’s it. That’s all.
You were the one that started this thread with the question as to whether the report that Mueller agreeing to written responses from Trump is what surrender looks like.
I thought pointing out that the original report being at tad inaccurate might be relevant to the discussion.
It's weird how little coverage it's gotten outside of a blurb on CNN about a year ago.
I bet "Huber Investigation" is a good one to compare search engine results.
Again...I was asked a legal question...I answered it.
That’s it.
That’s all.
I wasn’t making or trying to make anything out of anything.
I was answering a question.
Speaking of Mueller... god dam great work on Popadapoulis! I bet 2 weeks of hard time will teach that bastard to collude with Russia.
