Unless we do the interfering!
https://amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/12/obama-admin-sent-taxpayer-money-oust-netanyahu/
https://amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/12/obama-admin-sent-taxpayer-money-oust-netanyahu/
Interfering in another nation's elections is wrong!
- Thread starter AC_Exotic
- Start date
What makes you think this is the actual story?
It's great political cover.
What would we be talking about if Russia's lifetime effort to f with us wasn't front and center?
What would we be talking about if Russia's lifetime effort to f with us wasn't front and center?
It includes things like "details" and "timelines" that are hallmarks of actual stories.
So the Times engage in irresponsible journalism? Or only when they expose your "team?"
The Washington Times is a trash news paper independent of this. There is nothing wrong with them picking up and reporting on a story that was originally reported by a blog.
Trash because they don't report news within the sphere of the liberal paradigm?
What does this say about the bias and irresponsibility of CNN, MSNBC, ABC (among others)?
Must be nice being so gullible.
I have no idea what the real story is but your link doesn't add any answers either
I don't know what to tell you. The Washington Times doesn't even bother with the pretense of being concerned with the truth, it is a trash newspaper. Do you think MSNBC and CNN are good news networks? If you were to call them trash, I would certainly understand and wouldn't come back with "Trash because they don't report news within the sphere of the liberal paradigm?"
That would be Fox news.
The frustrating part about getting to the bottom of what is actually happening in the world is our news sources are more concerned with operating within the parameters that serve the best interests of their corporate ownership.
Who can we really trust these days? It's frustrating to me because it at one time seemed as if CNN did their best to play it down the middle.
Speaking of Fox, I did feel good that they were critical pretty much across the board of Trump yesterday. (I did watch some news yesterday.)
the good news is most sources only lie by omission. The bad news is sometimes you have to cast a wide net to catch everything that is omitted.
Just look at who works where.
Not exactly sure when it became this way, but a prominent purpose of the corporate media has become PR and activism for the DNC.
#Pillow-talk
Founded on May 17, 1982, by Sun Myung Moon, the Times was owned by News World Communications, an international media conglomerate associated with the Unification Church, until 2010, when Moon and a group of former executives purchased the paper. It is currently owned by diversified conglomerate Operations Holdings, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of the church.[6][7]
Which is worse a company owned by the Moonies or one owned by godless atheists?
Is believing in God a prerequisite for moral supremacy in your eyes?
Maybe I could walk around the street corner with a sign saying “God Hates Fags” and spitting hate speech masquerading as sermon from a megaphone or something of that nature. Is that better than being a godless atheist?
It is a spiritually-based movement of legally independent organizations that include businesses, news media, education and arts projects and political and social activism.[3]
The movement has had strong criticism and has attracted numerous controversies, including that of being a dangerous cult.[4][5]
The movement has had strong criticism and has attracted numerous controversies, including that of being a dangerous cult.[4][5]
Totally, totally agree. In addition, there just aren't that many "news" channels or shows, most of them spend the majority of their time giving opinions. Outside of National Review, maybe Forbes and a couple other conservative sites, I just don't think they have much pretense of intellectual honesty. That, and corporate media has such a broad audience that doesn't really "get" much depth, I've fallen into a pattern where I don't watch much tv "news" and read headlines or tweets and blogs. If a topic catches me, I'll independently search it and figure out what's happened.
Like the kids at the border. "Conservative" media totally misrepresented what happened. They just lied. "Liberal" TV media got a story and narrative and pounded it for several days, while social and print media was two generations ahead of them. If it aint' profitable, the corporate media isn't covering it.
I finally saw the undited TV clips of Biff and Putin, and didn't think that MSNBC misrepresented anything last night during the time I listened. That was just reporting his words, though...
Godless atheists are frequently good, conscientious, accomplished people that don't have any agendas.
But I'll play. So.... which is worse narrator of events, a godless atheist or heretic?
You are anti religion and you have a personality as appealing as a skunks scent gland.
Latest posts
-
-
90 Million Shady Transactions from Over 4 Million Government Credit Cards- Latest: OctaviusRexLTH1
-
-
-