IMPEACHMENT
- Thread starter CBradSmith
- Start date
Nah dawg, no collusion, no obstruction. Total exoneration.
Guess you're more of a "stand there and bleed" guy.
Not sure you’d see me coming.
Guess you're more of a "stand there and bleed" guy.
Not sure you’d see me coming.
Oh, this is about me and you now? You are the least intimidating presence on the board.
So this isn't
1. about you and Trump.
2. about Trump and what you feel is justice.
Maybe @Syskatine has more gumption.
Sure, I'd hear you coming.
Other items...you give ol' Maxine a run with how you use language.
You back on the Mueller bandwagon?
Mueller: "If we had confidence that the president did not commit a crime, we would have said so."
Also Mueller findings on a Trump crime: " "
Nah dawg, no collusion, no obstruction. Total exoneration.
Time is now son.
PEACH MINTS time!!
GOod luck keeping up with the strawmen. I've never sen anything like it. It's like they've handed their brain to talking heads and said, "Fill it up and tell me what to say." You can't have a convo with it.
Can't wait until 2020? Scared of the election and the fake dossier investigation?
I can handle it for a few hours at a time.
Thinking of starting a thread that uses "racism" just to watch the meltdown for the next 2 - 3 days... maybe even call Trump a racist. Would you be willing to make like.. a sensible post every couple days to keep it roiling I'm out of pocket tomorrow but can tend the incel flame on Friday.
I'm saddened at how frail you've both become.
Not addressing the elephant in the room...
Where's your stones boys?
@Syskatine @Pokeabear
Not addressing the elephant in the room...
Where's your stones boys?
@Syskatine @Pokeabear
Time for you liberals to do your business or get off the pot. Enough of talking about impeachment, do it and let the cards fall where they fall.
I'm having trouble with the lingo here. A special council's job is not to exonerate someone. Its to investigate and recommend charges if there is evidence that a crime is committed. Either there is and the charges are recommended, or there isn't and they aren't. What Mueller thinks happened (or has confidence in) should be absolutely irrelevant. In fact, his job is explicitly not to guess or estimate what he thinks happened, but rather follow the evidence and determine what can be proven. Heck, if I was Grassley or one of the other Repubs, I'd subpoena him and ask one question: "After two years of investigation, did you find enough evidence to recommend the DA file any charges against Donald Trump?" This is a yes/no answer. If he says, yes, then you ask why that wasn't in the report. If he says, no, then you are done. Everything else is word salad meant to confuse and muddle the issue.
OLC memo specifically precludes charging of a sitting President. Mueller is by the book. If AG Barr wanted Mueller to make a prosecutorial declination he should have lifted the guidelines or the President himself could have. They didn’t.
Mueller has successfully completed his mission. He's led the coup attempt and dropped the final bomb. Mueller and his Democrat investigation team left us with an incompetent racist Trump and Asian Americans, Hispanic Americans and black Americans with lowest unemployment numbers since records have been kept.
2 undeniable truths: Trump is not a plantation cracker and baseless racist charges is MO for the left. As for me? I'm only about 5/8 racist. I'm not the full blown racist as most on this board. I learned this from the left at a very early age.
2 undeniable truths: Trump is not a plantation cracker and baseless racist charges is MO for the left. As for me? I'm only about 5/8 racist. I'm not the full blown racist as most on this board. I learned this from the left at a very early age.
Mueller then explained, citing Department of Justice policy, that a President "cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional."
"Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view, that, too, is prohibited," Mueller said. The special counsel's office is part of the Department of Justice, he said, and is therefore bound by its policies.
"Charging the President with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider," he said.
