I Say Love is the 7th Wave, I Say Love is the 7th Wave..
- Thread starter Marshal Jim Duncan
- Start date
Several polls out recently saying the same. Blue wave has become an ebb tide.
Last edited:
It's hard to gain supporters when the left's only political positions are resist Trump.
"We're going to increase taxes, demand sanctuary cities, get soft on crime, waste more money, and screw up your healthcare costs even more!" (not an all inclusive list of their stupidity) isn't much of a winner.
"We're going to increase taxes, demand sanctuary cities, get soft on crime, waste more money, and screw up your healthcare costs even more!" (not an all inclusive list of their stupidity) isn't much of a winner.
Supporting MS-13 to attack Trump is an unacceptable line to across for those who are not animals. Morally reprehensible and no way to defend it. I do not care to reconcile my feelings for some of the posters on this board attacking Trump over this. I really want to believe these are not bad people, but it sure is starting to feel that way and I have zero interest in conversing or hanging out with bad people, out of my life, gone.
Are you going to vote for people who support rapists and muderers for political gain or people trying to improve the economy, give you more take home pay, secure our borders, negotiate better trade deals, pull out of of a bad Iran deal, trying to denuclearize North Korea, going to go after the Obama Admin criminals, etc...
Not certain how many brain cells it takes to figure that out but evidently our country is getting smarter by the day. It is a no brainer, not worth debating anyone that defends MS-13 over our President and whose previous Presidential candidate considers non-MS-13 supporters deplorables. Who could have predicted the Dems would willingly and gladly expose for everyone to see just how rotten at the core they really are. I understand dirty politics, but we are past dirty politics.
Some people literally do not care people are being raped and killed by animals and are willing to use the suffering of others as a political punch line for their own selfish needs while smugly assuming their daughter will never be raped and murdered by these animals. Karma is going to be a bitch, and it could be in more ways then one. These are the lengths of their morally reprehensible words and people are naive to think these same people that fixed their own DNC nominating process would not spy on the Trump campaign or start a knowingly fictitious investigation over Russia. Who are the wolves? Those trying to eliminate the rapists and killers and not afraid to call them out for exactly what they are to comfort the victims, or those willing to defend the rapists and killers in order to protect their selfish self interests and take away from the American public a fair democratic election process.
I will not be on the side of History that defends MS-13 or a political party that does, many Americans will not either and they are seeing which party is the wolf and which is the sheep herder. When the hard left idealogy gets dumped it is going to get dumped hard, when you see something morally reprehensible you move it out of your life for good, simply not going to have anything to do with it. Good bye.
Are you going to vote for people who support rapists and muderers for political gain or people trying to improve the economy, give you more take home pay, secure our borders, negotiate better trade deals, pull out of of a bad Iran deal, trying to denuclearize North Korea, going to go after the Obama Admin criminals, etc...
Not certain how many brain cells it takes to figure that out but evidently our country is getting smarter by the day. It is a no brainer, not worth debating anyone that defends MS-13 over our President and whose previous Presidential candidate considers non-MS-13 supporters deplorables. Who could have predicted the Dems would willingly and gladly expose for everyone to see just how rotten at the core they really are. I understand dirty politics, but we are past dirty politics.
Some people literally do not care people are being raped and killed by animals and are willing to use the suffering of others as a political punch line for their own selfish needs while smugly assuming their daughter will never be raped and murdered by these animals. Karma is going to be a bitch, and it could be in more ways then one. These are the lengths of their morally reprehensible words and people are naive to think these same people that fixed their own DNC nominating process would not spy on the Trump campaign or start a knowingly fictitious investigation over Russia. Who are the wolves? Those trying to eliminate the rapists and killers and not afraid to call them out for exactly what they are to comfort the victims, or those willing to defend the rapists and killers in order to protect their selfish self interests and take away from the American public a fair democratic election process.
I will not be on the side of History that defends MS-13 or a political party that does, many Americans will not either and they are seeing which party is the wolf and which is the sheep herder. When the hard left idealogy gets dumped it is going to get dumped hard, when you see something morally reprehensible you move it out of your life for good, simply not going to have anything to do with it. Good bye.
But now they’re gonna drain the swamp!!!!
Announced by swampy Schumer and Swamp **** Pelosi.
florida’s doosh is a vegan constitutionalist defending us from big bad trump
guarantee you he squats to piss
guarantee you he squats to piss
RNC: $ 43.8 million cash on hand (no debt).
DNC: $6.7 million cash on hand; $4.2 million in debt.
DNC: $6.7 million cash on hand; $4.2 million in debt.
https://www.the74million.org/articl...rs-will-leave-within-2-years-leaders-predict/
"The nation’s largest teachers union plans to reduce its budget by $50 million in anticipation of an unfavorable verdict in Janus v. AFSCME, a case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court in February that challenges the right of government unions to charge non-members for representing them.
When delegates to the National Education Association meet in Minneapolis in July, union leaders will introduce a two-year budget that cuts expenditures by $50 million, an estimated 13 percent reduction from this year.
NEA’s budget committee forecasts a two-year loss of 307,000 members if, as expected later in the spring, the Supreme Court eliminates agency fees — mandatory costs to workers who don’t become union members but are covered by union agreements. Those near-term losses will almost entirely occur in the 22 states where fees are still charged, erasing post-recession membership gains in places like California, New Jersey, and New York."
"The nation’s largest teachers union plans to reduce its budget by $50 million in anticipation of an unfavorable verdict in Janus v. AFSCME, a case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court in February that challenges the right of government unions to charge non-members for representing them.
When delegates to the National Education Association meet in Minneapolis in July, union leaders will introduce a two-year budget that cuts expenditures by $50 million, an estimated 13 percent reduction from this year.
NEA’s budget committee forecasts a two-year loss of 307,000 members if, as expected later in the spring, the Supreme Court eliminates agency fees — mandatory costs to workers who don’t become union members but are covered by union agreements. Those near-term losses will almost entirely occur in the 22 states where fees are still charged, erasing post-recession membership gains in places like California, New Jersey, and New York."
Finally, this is just beautiful: https://www.nationaljournal.com/s/668302/democrats-scramble-avoid-california-disaster
"California has become ground zero of the anti-Trump resistance movement, but the unharnessed liberal energy has become an unexpected problem in the party’s battle to win back a House majority. Democrats are contesting 10 GOP-held House seats there—nearly half of the number they need to win for Nancy Pelosi to become speaker again—but in several of those races, so many candidates are running that the party risks getting shut out of the general election.
The precarious situation Democrats face is a result of California’s activism running amok. In 2010, the state eliminated partisan primaries in favor of a system in which all candidates, regardless of party affiliation, run on the same primary ballot—with the top two vote-getters facing each other in November. . .
The districts where Republicans are the weakest are, paradoxically, ones that Democrats are more likely to blow because the party couldn’t coalesce behind one consensus challenger. . . .
In one swing-district House race against GOP Rep. Mimi Walters, Democrats are more likely to nominate a progressive acolyte of Elizabeth Warren than a more pragmatic mentee of Chuck Schumer. Katie Porter, the leading Democratic contender, said she supported a single-payer health care system—a position that’s problematic in an affluent suburban Orange County seat. Her main opponent, Dave Min, has backed a more incremental approach.
And against ethically embattled Rep. Duncan Hunter, the Democratic front-runner is the grandson of a Palestinian terrorist who was linked to the rampage against Israelis at the 1972 Munich Olympics. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee-favored candidate, retired Naval officer Josh Butner, is badly lagging behind."
"California has become ground zero of the anti-Trump resistance movement, but the unharnessed liberal energy has become an unexpected problem in the party’s battle to win back a House majority. Democrats are contesting 10 GOP-held House seats there—nearly half of the number they need to win for Nancy Pelosi to become speaker again—but in several of those races, so many candidates are running that the party risks getting shut out of the general election.
The precarious situation Democrats face is a result of California’s activism running amok. In 2010, the state eliminated partisan primaries in favor of a system in which all candidates, regardless of party affiliation, run on the same primary ballot—with the top two vote-getters facing each other in November. . .
The districts where Republicans are the weakest are, paradoxically, ones that Democrats are more likely to blow because the party couldn’t coalesce behind one consensus challenger. . . .
In one swing-district House race against GOP Rep. Mimi Walters, Democrats are more likely to nominate a progressive acolyte of Elizabeth Warren than a more pragmatic mentee of Chuck Schumer. Katie Porter, the leading Democratic contender, said she supported a single-payer health care system—a position that’s problematic in an affluent suburban Orange County seat. Her main opponent, Dave Min, has backed a more incremental approach.
And against ethically embattled Rep. Duncan Hunter, the Democratic front-runner is the grandson of a Palestinian terrorist who was linked to the rampage against Israelis at the 1972 Munich Olympics. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee-favored candidate, retired Naval officer Josh Butner, is badly lagging behind."
Similar threads
