ADVERTISEMENT

I dislike Elijah Cummings too...

when I saw him screaming at the border patrol guys who are out there doing their job as best as possible I knew he was a complete $ucking idiot. You're screaming at the wrong guy fella. What a dumbass. And, he has apparently been doing this for years.
 
His performance last week was sickening. These big city liberals with their gated communities and opposing squalor in their districts are trying to lecture on the conditions of the border? Half the country eats it up though.

An osu grad who I believe was in the military and lived abroad (can’t remember for sure) thinks this is all just “oversight.”
 
UK was also a lifelong Republican.
I posted an article, not my problem you didn't bother to read it................
:rolleyes:

I'm still waiting on something from you verifying your claim that the UK doesn't allow Fox News in the UK. Or would you like to acknowledge your claim was bullshit?

I posted part of an article from the BBC, not my problem you didn't read it, they violated two rules, one on being biased and one where they reported illegal Government stuff after the Manchester bombing
 
I posted part of an article from the BBC, not my problem you didn't read it, they violated two rules, one on being biased and one where they reported illegal Government stuff after the Manchester bombing
And as I responded, that didn't support your claim that the UK doesn't allow Fox News in the UK. If that's all you have, we can safely assume that your claim was bullshit, no?
 
His performance last week was sickening. These big city liberals with their gated communities and opposing squalor in their districts are trying to lecture on the conditions of the border? Half the country eats it up though.

An osu grad who I believe was in the military and lived abroad (can’t remember for sure) thinks this is all just “oversight.”
It is Congress' job to look at conditions on the boarder.........I agree on tough immigration laws, but, the people that are here, we need to treat them like humans.......

President Trump does not like him, or any other Committee Chairmen because they are trying to provide oversight, and he does not think they have the right to do that.......if he had nothing to hide, he would allow McGahn and the others to appear before their committees, it's Congress' Constitutional mandate to do this........he is going to bring on an official Impeachment inquiry, and it will be 100% his own doing. Then he will not have a choice who testifies
 
I don't believe fox news is on in Britain...Trump was complaining about it a month or so ago.
 
It is Congress' job to look at conditions on the boarder.........I agree on tough immigration laws, but, the people that are here, we need to treat them like humans.......

President Trump does not like him, or any other Committee Chairmen because they are trying to provide oversight, and he does not think they have the right to do that.......if he had nothing to hide, he would allow McGahn and the others to appear before their committees, it's Congress' Constitutional mandate to do this........he is going to bring on an official Impeachment inquiry, and it will be 100% his own doing. Then he will not have a choice who testifies

They aren’t oversighting anything. Cummings is the same guy that demanded info from Fox News about trumps affairs to question a story that didn’t even get published. 5 major media orgs working around the clock to get trump and Cummings focuses on that? Where was his oversight for Obama? Do you have any evidence his oversight has been non partisan? He wasn’t a chairman of course, but was he speaking out on these same conditions? Giving snarling rabid speeches for the children?

Why do you buy this theatre? How do you justify the outrage that follows what the media chooses for you?
 
Last edited:
They aren’t oversighting anything. Cummings is the same guy that demanded info from Fox News about trumps affairs to question a story that didn’t never even got published. 5 major media orgs working around the clock to get trump and Cummings focuses on that? Where was his oversight for Obama? Do you have any evidence his oversight has been non partisan? He wasn’t a chairman of course, but was he speaking out on these same conditions? Giving snarling rabid speeches for the children?

Why do you buy this theatre? How do you justify the outrage that follows what the media chooses for you?
Cummins only supports House oversight when it doesn't involve Democrats. His history speaks for itself. If Trump was a Democrat, Cummins would be doing everything he could to impede oversight.
 
I posted an article, not my problem you didn't bother to read it................


I posted part of an article from the BBC, not my problem you didn't read it, they violated two rules, one on being biased and one where they reported illegal Government stuff after the Manchester bombing

Isn't it funny that the British government said FOX News is biased but CNN is free to do as they please?
 
^^^ Truth ^^^
Is not his and others in the Majority party's job to look @ and do something humane but Secure at the southern border for American oversight and control of the invasion and doing something about it too ? Or is that only if we are admitting (d) votes ?
 
Last edited:
That's not because they were been banned by the UK. They closed their UK operation in 2017 because of low viewership.
They did also have complaints, and violated several OFCOM regulations
They aren’t oversighting anything. Cummings is the same guy that demanded info from Fox News about trumps affairs to question a story that didn’t even got published. 5 major media orgs working around the clock to get trump and Cummings focuses on that? Where was his oversight for Obama? Do you have any evidence his oversight has been non partisan? He wasn’t a chairman of course, but was he speaking out on these same conditions? Giving snarling rabid speeches for the children?

Why do you buy this theatre? How do you justify the outrage that follows what the media chooses for you?
How many Benghazi investigations were there? 7........each time with the same conclusions.........
When an investigation ( the Mueller report) says that the White house counsel stated that the President ordered him to fire the Special counsel, and the President claims it is a lie, then Congress needs to bring him in an find out the truth....that is one of several instances, and as Americans we should all want the truth........
The biggest thing is the Russian interference in our elections, we should all want to know the truth about that
 
They did also have complaints, and violated several OFCOM regulations

How many Benghazi investigations were there? 7........each time with the same conclusions.........
When an investigation ( the Mueller report) says that the White house counsel stated that the President ordered him to fire the Special counsel, and the President claims it is a lie, then Congress needs to bring him in an find out the truth....that is one of several instances, and as Americans we should all want the truth........
The biggest thing is the Russian interference in our elections, we should all want to know the truth about that

Who cares if Trump wanted Mueller fired, he had every right given to the office of the President to fire him for any reason he wanted. Only easily manipulated people care if Trump wanted Mueller fired. Heck based on Mueller's performance at the hearing you Trump haters should have wanted him fired and replaced with a Trump hater that had some ability.
 
Not because of the color of his skin, but because of the content of his character.

:)

Yep he is a piece of trash.
SJJFZjs.gif
 
Some of yous should have a little more critical discretion.
The BBC makes awesome animal documentaries, but are shockingly biased with regard to Trump and our politics.
Any credence given them in that respect is casting your pearls before swine.

Caveat emptor.
 
They did also have complaints, and violated several OFCOM regulations

How many Benghazi investigations were there? 7........each time with the same conclusions.........
When an investigation ( the Mueller report) says that the White house counsel stated that the President ordered him to fire the Special counsel, and the President claims it is a lie, then Congress needs to bring him in an find out the truth....that is one of several instances, and as Americans we should all want the truth........
The biggest thing is the Russian interference in our elections, we should all want to know the truth about that

And what happened? The left went bananas over the Benghazi investigations. @Syskatine flapped his wings like there was a snake in the hen house. Of course people died, service men told us what really happened, hillary, Obama and Susan rice lied (please acknowledge this) about a terrorist attack.

The only thing that’s changed on the border is the about face of Cummings and his ilk. They went from lying about wanting border security to openly flaunting their desire to flood us with Central Americans. And now that some of us who are older than five know this, everyone is a racist for calling them out. It’s pathetic. I hope trump goes scorched earth in his second term on all of these liars and hypocrites.

Bernie Sanders said Baltimore was a third world country. Can you reconcile the reaction (yours and the media) from his 2016 comments to trumps now? Also, do you admit that a representative spending time lambasting the patriots at the border is sickening when there are schools in his district without heat?
 
Thanks to sis Maya (name must mean 'good fortune' in some language) translates to big bucks for them at the expense of others in Mericanese...
 
  • Like
Reactions: K2C Sooner
The biggest thing is the Russian interference in our elections, we should all want to know the truth about that

I agree, and the Mueller point was clear on this fact. The Russians are attempting to influence our elections, but that there was no collusion or improper interaction between Trump's campaign and the Russians. This is in the report. There are outstanding questions about Trump obstructing the investigation (although most of the supposed actions never actually occurred, such as the firing of Mueller), but chasing someone for having considered performing obstruction of a crime that a 2-year investigation says didn't occur seems a bit politically motivated to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
What lack of character? providing oversight? Which BTW is his Constitutional responsibility

I could seriously buy this, IF the Dem attorneys that we now know did the Mueller investigation had investigated the Steele Dossier for the true implications of voting tampering and IF the Dems and Cummings were willing to look at this as well, to look at this in its entirety without partisan politics.

If you really believe this is now not all political? Not certain what to tell you other than you obviously hate Trump and for many that equals the end justifying the means. I actually thought you were above that.
 
Last edited:
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/27/elijah-cummings-at-freddie-gray-funeral-we-will-no/

Let's not forget Cummings role in stirring up tensions in the case of Freddie Gray. Instead of using Freddie Gray as an example of what happens when you are a worthless POS, Democrats, liberals and the race baiting crowd used the situation for their own political gain.
It's real simple to keep from having problems with the police, be respectful and quit breaking the law.
Yep, 10 indictments, 10 acquittals.

Biggest barrel of bovine bullshit whatever was.
 
I thought Prosecutors were supposed to be neutral, that innocent until proven guilty crap is only as good as it's district's best interest apparently... ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Soonersincefitty
It is Congress' job to look at conditions on the boarder.........I agree on tough immigration laws, but, the people that are here, we need to treat them like humans.......

President Trump does not like him, or any other Committee Chairmen because they are trying to provide oversight, and he does not think they have the right to do that.......if he had nothing to hide, he would allow McGahn and the others to appear before their committees, it's Congress' Constitutional mandate to do this........he is going to bring on an official Impeachment inquiry, and it will be 100% his own doing. Then he will not have a choice who testifies
Who says we aren't? They chose to come here, what do you want, 5 star accomodations? Maybe we're doing the best we can with the amount of people the Dems gave false hope to come here. I'm sure treatment hasn't changed since the obama years, and no Dim went to the border and checked things then. 3 meals a day and a roof over their heads has to be an improvement. It's a shit situation that didn't just happen since January, 2017.[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited:
Who says we aren't? They chose to come here, what do you want, 5 star accomodations? Maybe we're doing the best we can with the amount of people the Dems gave false hope to come here. I'm sure treatment hasn't changed since the obama years, and no Dim went to the border and checked things then. 3 meals a day and a roof over their heads has to be an improvement. It's a shit situation that didn't just happen since January, 2017.
[/QUOTE]
3 meals a day and a roof over their head is better than some of our veterans have.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT