ADVERTISEMENT

"How Green Was My Tesla"?

  • Like
Reactions: ThorOdinson13
Your assumptions are incorrect. Per the EIA:

Kilowatthour generated per unit of fuel used:
  • 1,927 kWh per ton, or 0.96 kWh per pound, of coal
  • 99 kWh per Mcf (1,000 cubic feet) of natural gas
  • 578 kWh per barrel, or 13.76 kWh per gallon, of petroleum

And 1 bbl of petroleum = 5,800.64 cubic feet of natural gas. 5,800.64/1,000 = 5.80064.

5.80064 x 99 = 574.2634
 
Your assumptions are incorrect. Per the EIA:

Kilowatthour generated per unit of fuel used:
  • 1,927 kWh per ton, or 0.96 kWh per pound, of coal
  • 99 kWh per Mcf (1,000 cubic feet) of natural gas
  • 578 kWh per barrel, or 13.76 kWh per gallon, of petroleum

And 1 bbl of petroleum = 5,800.64 cubic feet of natural gas. 5,800.64/1,000 = 5.80064.

5.80064 x 99 = 574.2634
  • Kilowatthour generated per unit of fuel used:
    • 1,927 kWh per ton, or 0.96 kWh per pound, of coal
    • 99 kWh per Mcf (1,000 cubic feet) of natural gas
    • 578 kWh per barrel, or 13.76 kWh per gallon, of petroleum
Assumptions:

Power plant heat rates (for steam electric generators in 2014)
Coal = 10,080 Btu/kWh
Natural gas = 10,408 Btu/kWh
Petroleum = 10,156 Btu/kWh
 
  • Kilowatthour generated per unit of fuel used:
    • 1,927 kWh per ton, or 0.96 kWh per pound, of coal
    • 99 kWh per Mcf (1,000 cubic feet) of natural gas
    • 578 kWh per barrel, or 13.76 kWh per gallon, of petroleum
Assumptions:

Power plant heat rates (for steam electric generators in 2014)
Coal = 10,080 Btu/kWh
Natural gas = 10,408 Btu/kWh
Petroleum = 10,156 Btu/kWh
Further data on the efficiency difference between steam cycle and combined cycle. http://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual/html/epa_08_02.html
 
Using the 2015 figures from the combined cycle generation from the link you provided, I get 779.7 kWh per Mcf og NG to 606.1 per bbl of petroleum. So, in that case, you're correct that it produces more energy per unit.

I still don't believe it destroys the thesis that electric cars aren't especially more green than internal combustion vehicles.
 
Using the 2015 figures from the combined cycle generation from the link you provided, I get 779.7 kWh per Mcf og NG to 606.1 per bbl of petroleum. So, in that case, you're correct that it produces more energy per unit.

I still don't believe it destroys the thesis that electric cars aren't especially more green than internal combustion vehicles.
But you just plug them into your outlet...and when they run I don't see any exhaust.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
electric cars aren't especially more green than internal combustion vehicles.
They aren't. Whether you burn fuel to turn a motor in a car or burn fuel to turn a generator, you burn fuel to produce power in some form.

The only way it becomes significantly more green is if the electric power comes from a source that isn't fossil fuel, assuming generating electricity by those forms in enough quanity to replace fossil isn't just as or more environmentally unfriendly than the fossil fuels.
 
So is coal. Gas is clean burning and leaps and bounds more thermally efficient.
But they didn't switch to it large scale until it became cheaper relative to coal and/or they were forced to by the government making it so onerous to operate coal fired plants. Switching will still occur (if the government allows it) if the price of NG rises enough.

https://btuanalytics.com/coal-to-gas-switching-in-2016/
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT