An interesting piece: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...tic-race-now.html?via=desktop&source=facebook
Hillary Would be in Real Trouble if She Weren't Playing in Such a Rigged Game
- Thread starter Marshal Jim Duncan
- Start date
In any sane universe she would've been shamed out of running because of Benghazi, and in Leavenworth right now because of email-gate
This is going to be an exciting next few months.
Trump is going to run rough shod over her ...
... unless the Clintonistas pull out their bag of dirty tricks. (I'm sure a public personality like Trump has plenty of material floating around that they could use.)
... unless the Clintonistas pull out their bag of dirty tricks. (I'm sure a public personality like Trump has plenty of material floating around that they could use.)
I still can't see it. The media are in the bag for her. And the Clinton's WILL pull out every dirty trick imaginable.
The only thing different these days is influence of non-traditional media on a growing number of voters.
Virtually no one watches what network analysts have to say regarding candidates. No one reads newspapers these days. Most typically receive their news from one of their favorite internet sites or are influenced by talk radio. That's why unconventional candidates like Trump, Cruz, and Sanders have remained relevant and the punches that the traditional media have attempted to throw have been little more than glancing blows.
Of course, that's just my opinion, which is worth very little.
I'm thinking Trump could match her in dirty tricks. Unlike previous GOP candidates, he'd retaliate.
Other than real photographic evidence showing Trump leaving the scene where a dead hooker lay, what is out there that is so damaging that it's going to sink Trump?
That's an honest question. I think most people have already "priced in" to their estimate of Trump that, yeah, he can be a sleezy guy, but it's better to go with the devil that you know than the one that you don't.
That's an honest question. I think most people have already "priced in" to their estimate of Trump that, yeah, he can be a sleezy guy, but it's better to go with the devil that you know than the one that you don't.
The hilariously ironic thing is this - Obama has perfected the art of stepping in so much shit that nothing matters, and Hillary took it to an art form. She's one of the few people who has more dirt on her than Trump probably does. She'll have no credibility on any dirty tricks, and he won't care. Little Mario and Lyin Ted are doing a great job of prepping him for Hillary.
This election will be studied for centuries.
Nothing to see here. Hillary says the FBI is just conducting a routine security review, just like every other routine security review the FBI has never done.
Trump has no dirt on The Vagina. It's just all right wing conspiracy. Just wait, Hillary is destined for sainthood. Smartest woman on the planet. Second most popular woman on the planet. Vagina 2016!
Trump has no dirt on The Vagina. It's just all right wing conspiracy. Just wait, Hillary is destined for sainthood. Smartest woman on the planet. Second most popular woman on the planet. Vagina 2016!
If Loretta Lynch has her way Hildebitch won't get indicted even if the evidence is overwhelming.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/l...ot-required-to-charge-clinton/article/2585342
But, the DOJ is furiously discussing going after those "national security" treasonists commonly known as global warming (climate change) deniers.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...-legal-action-against-climate-change-deniers/
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/l...ot-required-to-charge-clinton/article/2585342
But, the DOJ is furiously discussing going after those "national security" treasonists commonly known as global warming (climate change) deniers.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...-legal-action-against-climate-change-deniers/
Global warming (climate change) [carbon pollution] FIFY
Do you not know that carbon pollution global warming climate change is the biggest source of terrorism? Geez. Somebody has got to go after those terror producing fossil fuel folks.
Because the "scientists" haven't declared dire consequences for leisure travel. I'm pretty sure that leisure travel carbon pollution doesn't count, much like the 2,800 calories of Ranch dressing on top of a salad don't count. Could you imagine if environmental activists couldn't travel? Every rest stop would have to turned into a safe place.
Because all these celebrities like Leo, liberal CEOs, and politicians would have to ground their private jets. Obama's almost worn out two 747s.
