Hardly warrants attention anymore.
- Thread starter Syskatine
- Start date
Yet you mention it.
I disagree. The 2A hasn’t paid off yet.
I just read this was the city municipal building. Guns are usually banned in city buildings right?
Meanwhile, earlier this week in Japan, people are killed and maimed for riding a bus.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/least-2-dead-stabbing-attack-japan-n1010606
Kane killed Abel and there were no guns then right. Why make it easier that is my question.
How many would he have killed if he were armed with an AR-15 instead of a knife?
Because dealing a glancing blow to a group of home invaders isn't effective.
Binary trigger or stock trigger?
Municipal building, IE, gun free zone..
That coward would've gotten off two shots before a good guy put him down with a well placed head shot in MY ideal world.
Gun free zones are an oxymoron.
That coward would've gotten off two shots before a good guy put him down with a well placed head shot in MY ideal world.
Gun free zones are an oxymoron.
Japan had a knife attack a couple of years ago in which 16 people were killed. So, to answer your question, I dunno...16?
Around 15,000 people are killed by drunk drivers each year in this country. Think we should make it harder to do by taking cars and alcohol away from responsible people?
How many people have the government's of Russia, China, Vietnam, Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, and on and on killed because the benevolent governments had guns but the citizens didn't?
In the words of Carl Sagan...
Millions and millions.
How many deaths per year in the United States due to texting and driving?
With free will comes risk.
Get the rest of the world to disarm and stop killing and robbing people and I’ll give up my guns.
Guns in the hands of governments are as deadly as they'll ever get.
Abel should’ve armed himself.
Or if someone were carrying, how many people would a guy with a knife kill? One? None?
At least you are out in the open now that you admit you hate the 2nd Amendment.
If one person was armed and had the balls to act how many lives would of been saved?
With your moronic solution every law abiding citizen would give up their firearms. Since there are over 300 million guns in the USA alone and probably that many in Mexico it would be impossible to disarm anyone but law abiding citizens.
Why are you gun grabbing dickheads so ****ing stupid to these facts?
Facts don't matter to them.
They worship at the alter of feelings and emotions.
What a joyless, sad existence that has to be.
I recommend More Guns-Less Crime by John Lott. Mr. Lott is a former sniveling gun ban liberal who opened his eyes.
I dare one liberal on this board to explain what new gun law would help keep nut jobs from killing.
What does a common sense gun law entail?
Liberals are smarter than conservatives explain what your plan is to stop gun violence.
Last edited:
It has surpassed DUI's, you don't hear anyone raising hell about that. Ban all cell phones!
Almost looks like a standard staple, ketchup sammich
Oh no, make no mistake, that’s welch’s. Just ask anon.
Because it has nothing to do with prevention. Its clumsy pretext for a never ending attempt to overthrow the Constitution.
Precisely. The left doesn't care about truly stopping unnecessary deaths regardless of the cause. Marxist socialist regimes around the world have slaughtered tens upon tens of millions of people and yet they would impose similar governments here and around the world.
I'm looking at you COWBOYintheUK.
You seem to have a brain unlike the other childish libs on here. Explain common sense gun law to me and what it will do to stop violence.
300+ million guns, let's do gun control, go!
FYI, one of the MainBoarders was there. https://forums.rivals.com/threads/o...hread-keep-politics-out-or-get-banned.879889/
Good luck with this; can't wait for the shit-shoveling.
Last edited:
Look at all the forest fires the Diamond Match Company has caused.
From a leftist perspective, “Common sense gun laws” are awesome because they are doomed to fail to prevent mass shootings.
And then, more common sense laws until it’s easier for government stormtroopers to go pick them up with relatively minimal violence.
The dumber ones who can’t think that strategically just get bumper sticker virtue signaling self hugs from clamoring for them.
And then, more common sense laws until it’s easier for government stormtroopers to go pick them up with relatively minimal violence.
The dumber ones who can’t think that strategically just get bumper sticker virtue signaling self hugs from clamoring for them.
Also, and to augment, don't fall for the 'universal background check' scam.
The only way that would work, and the United Nations pimps it, is for universal gun registration.
It's bullshit and would gut the intent of and render the second amendment impotent.
We lose the deuce and the first, which is currently on life support, would be lost too.
Everything is up for grabs.
Fight!
Similar threads
