Green New Deal update
- Thread starter poke2001
- Start date
Can you imagine being one of those krasensteins and sitting by your phone all day just to be the first to teeet at someone that in five lifetimes you can never be successful as?
It's one of the more pathetic things I can imagine....
I am not a big fan of this Green new deal, at least as a whole concept, but anyone who actually thinks that is what it means is an idiot..........
Can you outline it for me? I’m guessing no since you still haven’t been able to provide the so easy examples of tweets by Trump and staff.
Explain please. I couldn't decipher what you were trying to say.
I’ll decipher, “Orange man bad”.
The renewable power is something that needs to be a goal , but not realistic until we achieve a commercially viable Fusion capability, progress is being made but requires a huge multinational investment, possible in 12 years but unlikely. As far as transportation, no one is saying do away with air travel, it calls for us to develop other transportation technologies (i.e. Hyperloop, high speed rail) which will make air travel needed less.....as far as no Military , I had not seen that but no one in their right mind would believe that. As I said, I don't agree with this New Green deal as a whole, all it is , is a set of loose ideas with no practical ways to achieve them, I think most would agree that they are decent ideas, but , I don't think the President should be mocking them, these are all things that will have to happen sooner or later, some sooner than later......
Can you please delineate which items in the Green New Deal are decent ideas and which are a set of loose ideas with no practical way of achieving them?
They are all loose ideas.......Eventually humanity will have to transition from oil and natural gas, we have to find a long term energy source, Fusion is the most practical, why would you not increase transportation technology........Free college would be great, but how are they going to pay for it......The entire Green new deal are things that many would agree would be good....great for the country and citizens, but how realistic? IMO not very.......
You just summarized the entire liberal left's platform.
You’ve gone off the rails.
Then explain how piratically they'll translate into real legislation that would enact or enable those ambitions to be accomplished in the next decade as laid out in the GND?
They are all terrible ideas, compounded by the fact it requires 100% government investment.
Nobody has argued against development of alternate energy sources. The argument is against the government mandating the source, timeline, etc. the government sucks really bad at choosing good alternatives, which is why we are forced to use ethanol today.
Let the energy markets define the path.
What is the carbon foot print of our military? I did a welding job at tinker and watched some high powered aircraft come in and out all day. Multiply that times our entire military and I don’t see how we can possibly keep it in good conscience while the planet dies.
We basically need to conquer the world and eliminate all other major militaries and then ours to save ourselves.
All's fair to save the planet. It is for their own good. Think of their children.
Confusion tactic but half of dem pres candidates are for it? For what?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/oc...-promise-security-for-those-unwilling-to-work
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/oc...-promise-security-for-those-unwilling-to-work
TDS is a debilitating condition.
