ADVERTISEMENT

GOP Gerrymandering dealt a blow

Not to defend the practice, but how do you draw boundaries that will appeal to both sides and still ensure that minority voters have a voice, but not one that is over represented. Given that Rs and Ds can't agree on anything, I'd be curious how anyone would expect Rs and Ds to agree on a map that invariably will shift representative power.
 
Not to defend the practice, but how do you draw boundaries that will appeal to both sides and still ensure that minority voters have a voice, but not one that is over represented. Given that Rs and Ds can't agree on anything, I'd be curious how anyone would expect Rs and Ds to agree on a map that invariably will shift representative power.

Computers????

There really isn't an easy and "fair" way. There will always be human influence in some shape or form.
 
Last edited:
Not to defend the practice, but how do you draw boundaries that will appeal to both sides and still ensure that minority voters have a voice, but not one that is over represented. Given that Rs and Ds can't agree on anything, I'd be curious how anyone would expect Rs and Ds to agree on a map that invariably will shift representative power.
Plenty of models out there. Very clear current approach disenfranchises voters...
 
Gerrymandering in Texas was a normal tool of the democrats for decades when they controlled every branch of government. Things began to change in the late 70's when Clements defeated White and became the first GOP Governor in over a century. The GOP took over the gerrymandering and the democrats squealed like suckling pigs.
 
Gerrymandering in Texas was a normal tool of the democrats for decades when they controlled every branch of government. Things began to change in the late 70's when Clements defeated White and became the first GOP Governor in over a century. The GOP took over the gerrymandering and the democrats squealed like suckling pigs.

To further add, Republicans squealed like suckling pigs from the 40s until they got the power.

Otherwise, I mostly agree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007 and wino
It's been a political tool since before the First Congress was elected in 1789. It's only bad when it doesn't benefit your side. There's even bipartisan gerrymandering. Go figure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CowboyJD
It's been a political tool since before the First Congress was elected in 1789. It's only bad when it doesn't benefit your side. There's even bipartisan gerrymandering. Go figure.

This...I agree with wholly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
To further add, Republicans squealed like suckling pigs from the 40s until they got the power.

Otherwise, I mostly agree.
There weren't enough republicans in the Texas Legislature back then for an audible squeal to be heard. They certainly didn't trot off to court to get there way when their faint squeals were ignored.
 
There weren't enough republicans in the Texas Legislature back then for an audible squeal to be heard. They certainly didn't trot off to court to get there way when their faint squeals were ignored.

Didn't have the voting rights act to rely upon.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT