ADVERTISEMENT

Gentlemen. Tonight let’s toast our Syrian adventure.

HanAholeSolo2.0

All-American
Jul 6, 2017
2,111
3,199
113
Corellia
www.starwars.com
I personally harbor great apprehension and misgivings over this endeavor, but for a moment let’s all hoist whatever we may be imbibing tonight to the pilots, intelligence assets and leadership begind these strikes. May they end future chemical attacks against civilians and may they not lead to an escalation. we’ve had more than enough loss of life and treasure.

tomorrow we can again pick political trenches to defend.

cheers.
 
Yes it always awesome to carry out strikes against people that like us on behalf of people that hate us and despise us and would slit our throat the first chance they get.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BIGOSUFAN
Yes it always awesome to carry out strikes against people that like us on behalf of people that hate us and despise us and would slit our throat the first chance they get.

Lol...nice try...

SyriaPopulationBySect.jpg
 
“It all started, nine o’clock Eastern time, with about a five-minute address by President Obama,” Brian Wiliams said, matter-of-factly to the camera. “Here’s a portion of that.”

President Obama finally enforced his red line? Good one, Brian Williams.

Lol.

Carry on.
 
“It all started, nine o’clock Eastern time, with about a five-minute address by President Obama,” Brian Wiliams said, matter-of-factly to the camera. “Here’s a portion of that.”

President Obama finally enforced his red line? Good one, Brian Williams.

Lol.

Carry on.
he's the gift that keep giving Clark....
 
Yes it always awesome to carry out strikes against people that like us on behalf of people that hate us and despise us and would slit our throat the first chance they get.

Lol...nice try...

SyriaPopulationBySect.jpg

Does anybody else practically giggle with glee at the thought of these two going after each other in full on manic rant mode?

Or is it just me?

Hasn’t happened yet, but they keep circling each other.

Can’t wait.
 
Does anybody else practically giggle with glee at the thought of these two going after each other in full on manic rant mode?

Or is it just me?

Hasn’t happened yet, but they keep circling each other.

Can’t wait.

I don't know who to pull for in this.

The only clarity I have in the whole deal is that Assad probably did exactly what they say, and at the end ofthe day it's nice to have the military that can just beat someone's ass as opposed to the opposite.
 
I don't know who to pull for in this.

The only clarity I have in the whole deal is that Assad probably did exactly what they say, and at the end ofthe day it's nice to have the military that can just beat someone's ass as opposed to the opposite.

Yeah...pretty much the same way, so I am just cheering for the safe return of all Americans and our allies.
 
what are the options here? Assad did it? The rebel’s staged it? Israel somehow or another wants help doing some damage.

I really want to believe the us abd uk intelligence know exactly what happened. Then there is the chance that trump is carrying on the foreign policy of his predecessors and staying involved just because that is apparently the plan regardless of who the president is.
 
what are the options here? Assad did it? The rebel’s staged it? Israel somehow or another wants help doing some damage.

I really want to believe the us abd uk intelligence know exactly what happened. Then there is the chance that trump is carrying on the foreign policy of his predecessors and staying involved just because that is apparently the plan regardless of who the president is.

I trust mattis. but just not pumped about the need or validity of this. hopefully we made our point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CBradSmith
chemical weapons don’t strike without knowing who did it period
 
what are the options here? Assad did it? The rebel’s staged it? Israel somehow or another wants help doing some damage.

I really want to believe the us abd uk intelligence know exactly what happened. Then there is the chance that trump is carrying on the foreign policy of his predecessors and staying involved just because that is apparently the plan regardless of who the president is.
I am old school with Syria.......The country has been run by the Assad family for decades, supported by the Russians, it been that way since at least the 1960s......our response was to always , along with our allies , keep Israel strong. But.........the war on ISIS has required the US to get directly involved. I am all for pulling out, and for discouraging in any way we can, including military strikes, the use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime. The use of Chemical / Biological weapons by any country is just as alarming as it would be for a country to use Nuclear weapons and needs to be dealt with. On the same token, we need to make sure, that we don't directly involve the Russians. We did a great job last night of making 100% sure the Russians knew we were not targeting any area where they deployed assets and personnel. Had we not warned the Russians in advance last night could have been very messy, instead all the Russians did was track our incoming weapons and left the Syrians to deal with them.......intentional war is bad enough, but accidental war is much worse. Last night, although not a overly large strike was brilliantly coordinated and executed and was a good first step IMO, but, we need to keep the pressure on, while reassuring Russia that they are not our objective.
 
I am old school with Syria.......The country has been run by the Assad family for decades, supported by the Russians, it been that way since at least the 1960s......our response was to always , along with our allies , keep Israel strong. But.........the war on ISIS has required the US to get directly involved. I am all for pulling out, and for discouraging in any way we can, including military strikes, the use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime. The use of Chemical / Biological weapons by any country is just as alarming as it would be for a country to use Nuclear weapons and needs to be dealt with. On the same token, we need to make sure, that we don't directly involve the Russians. We did a great job last night of making 100% sure the Russians knew we were not targeting any area where they deployed assets and personnel. Had we not warned the Russians in advance last night could have been very messy, instead all the Russians did was track our incoming weapons and left the Syrians to deal with them.......intentional war is bad enough, but accidental war is much worse. Last night, although not a overly large strike was brilliantly coordinated and executed and was a good first step IMO, but, we need to keep the pressure on, while reassuring Russia that they are not our objective.


Who to believe?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...yria-air-defences-shot-down-majority-missiles
 
All you had to look at were the BDA pictures to see that was not true...........The Syrian defense systems did not have the capability to ( aside from getting lucky) doing much against JASSMs, SCALPs and SLCMs ........the Russian systems only tracked the weapons, they didn;t engage them......that is the benefit we get from giving them advance warning of the attack, they know their assets are not targeted
 
I am old school with Syria.......The country has been run by the Assad family for decades, supported by the Russians, it been that way since at least the 1960s......our response was to always , along with our allies , keep Israel strong. But.........the war on ISIS has required the US to get directly involved. I am all for pulling out, and for discouraging in any way we can, including military strikes, the use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime. The use of Chemical / Biological weapons by any country is just as alarming as it would be for a country to use Nuclear weapons and needs to be dealt with. On the same token, we need to make sure, that we don't directly involve the Russians. We did a great job last night of making 100% sure the Russians knew we were not targeting any area where they deployed assets and personnel. Had we not warned the Russians in advance last night could have been very messy, instead all the Russians did was track our incoming weapons and left the Syrians to deal with them.......intentional war is bad enough, but accidental war is much worse. Last night, although not a overly large strike was brilliantly coordinated and executed and was a good first step IMO, but, we need to keep the pressure on, while reassuring Russia that they are not our objective.
Trump fired no ships were hit back. The attack was like you say well executed to limit colatoral damage. Looks like both sides decided they had enough of playing chicken for now. It is interesting that in the show of force of how the Russians reacted. I believe we are making up respect ground with them. Long way still to go. I actually think this move helps with our diplomatic relationship with Russia in the long term.
 
Russians have lots of options, but firing on US Navel vessels in international water was not then nor now an option. With all due respect to UK just wasn’t going to happen....wrong time, wrong place and wrong reasons.

What they could do is shut off all natural gas to Western Europe and deprive the US of any cooperation with Western Europe, save the UK.

The proxy state of Syria is not worth an actual shooting conflict between two super powers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
Liberals and Russians always seem to find each other intellectually. Aaaaaaand trump is hitler.

The Associated Press, citing a Russian media outlet, quoted a top Russian official as likening Trump to Nazi leader Adolf Hitler. Alexander Sherin, deputy head of the State Duma's defense committee, said Trump "can be called Adolf Hitler No. 2 of our time — because, you see, he even chose the time that Hitler attacked the Soviet Union," the AP reported.



https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/13/russia-warns-of-consequences-for-us-led-strike-on-syria.html
 
Maybe a hereditary dictator has more time for “extracurricular activities” throughout their life than someone that actually has to get elected by the public to advance their political career.

Maybe NZ (or more accurately whomever actually spoonfed NZ this idea) cherry picked all the European leaders that don’t have kids and didn’t mention any of those that do.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT