ADVERTISEMENT

GENOCIDE

JonnyVito

MegaPoke is insane
Gold Member
Mar 12, 2008
24,405
10,394
113
@syskatine So now that your hero has finally admitted to the atrocity being committed in the middle east by the evil group of ISIS will you admit you were wrong? Just wanting to see how much of a donk you really are. I suggest you get better contacts then the crummy news sources you seem to be brain washed by.
 
What sys probably can't comprehend is had this been say whites massacring African tribesmen or peaceful muslims, the rodent in chief, CAIR, The UN, media and the socialists in Europe all would have been clamoring for and gotten their way long ago. But since it's just those silly ole Christians among the rodent in chief homies not a big deal.
 
His quote was that us gun nuts are crazy to think Genocide could ever happen in this day and age. Well it is happening and not only that but no one is doing a whole lot to stop it. Everything being done over there is for agendas
 
@syskatine working on your rebuttal or cat got your tongue?

Youll-admit-you.jpg
 
@syskatine So now that your hero has finally admitted to the atrocity being committed in the middle east by the evil group of ISIS will you admit you were wrong? Just wanting to see how much of a donk you really are. I suggest you get better contacts then the crummy news sources you seem to be brain washed by.

1. Wtf are you talking about? A little context, please?

2. Genocide won't happen in the U.S. I don't think there's much doubt it can still happen in third world shitholes like Myanmar, Rwanda, Cambodia, Syria, etc.

3. If it was going to happen here, it would take lots of people that are real angry, not much internal moral base, don't think much, and easily alarmed. The more I read your anxiety-fueled, dumb ramblings I start to wonder if the ingredients aren't here.
 
2. Genocide won't happen in the U.S. I don't think there's much doubt it can still happen in third world shitholes like Myanmar, Rwanda, Cambodia, Syria, etc.
Syria is hardly considered a third world country. Well, at least it wasn't until the useless shit bags Obama and Hillary subjected the country to historic levels of stupid policy.

In fact, it's very safe and factual to say that the Obama administration bears some responsibility for what's been happening. If those two ass clowns hadn't been so stupid as to arm terrorists, likely the rise of ISIS would have been much less sensational and successful.
 
Sorry, but Syria is a 3rd world country and has been a shit-show long before Obama was elected.

I guess you're not old enough to remember the Yom Kippur War, the expansion of military operations into Lebanon's civil war, their funding of terrorists groups throughout the middle east, their attempt to build a nuclear reactor (bombed by Israel), their proxy attacks on Israel through southern Lebanon, etc.?

I guess we're also supposed to ignore their alignment with the old USSR, and now Russia when talking about Syria? (Why do you think that Putin popped in there to shore up the Assad regime? It was about protecting their only deep-water naval port outside of Russian territorial waters.) The Assad's have run Syria since the old man pulled a coup back in 1970 or so and have been on the US's "naughty list" for a long time.

Are we also supposed to ignore the fact that the Reagan Administration investigation into the bombing of the Marine Corps barracks in Beirut ended up pointing fingers at both Syria and Iran as being behind it through their use of proxies? (It was at that same time that Syria was trying to use its troops to secure political control over Lebanon or a good chunk of it.)

Now, I'll entertain an argument that Obama made it worse, but I'm not going to accept that everything was hunky-dory before that, because that's a completely mistaken take on the history of Syria. It is and has been nothing more than a Banana Republic in the desert for a long time.
 
For the record sys's comment wasn't about 3rd world countries like the donk is proposing. It was that Genocide would never happen in our life time. That governments would intervene and put a stop to it. The rebuttal was that in fact it could happen and us gun people would go a head and hang on to our guns. I tried to look this up the easy way last night but I guess this site only hold ten pages on the profiles of posters so I will have to go through this forum page by page. If one of with a better memory knew the thread like title or something that would go a long ways in helping me. It is BS what is happening over their and the POS POTUS is a POS for not helping more. Maybe his wife should start a twitter # tag. Both are POS and you know what I was going to sit out the election this year if Trump got the nod over my man Cruz but no not now. I am voting by damn and I am going to stick it to those BULLY'S Hillary and Bernie. I would never tell some one they couldn't vote for someone and what is happening with the left is UNAMERICAN. Anyone who organizes the shut down of another candidates rally is a effen commy eff those liberal scum bags Hillary and Bernie. I am waging political war!! My only wish is Cruz would get elected and you Obama humpers got a taste of the other side of the coin but of course the GOP is just as limp dicked as the POS POTUS.
 
Sorry, but Syria is a 3rd world country and has been a shit-show long before Obama was elected.
If you're referring to the term once used for countries who supported USSR
during the Cold War, I agree with you. That seems to be your take based on the history of Syria you posted.

BUT, that wasn't the context of either syskatine's or my post. In syskatine's post, he included Syria in a list of poor and poorly developed countries, the likes of which are commonly referred to as "third world." If you actually believe Syria fits that definition, I've got nothing for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CBradSmith
It was that Genocide would never happen in our life time. That governments would intervene and put a stop to it.
Unless old, rather young sys, was born after July 1994, genocide did occur in his and our lifetimes and almost 1,000,000 Rwandans paid the price for his ignorance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CBradSmith
Unless old, rather young sys, was born after July 1994, genocide did occur in his and our lifetimes and almost 1,000,000 Rwandans paid the price for his ignorance.

75 years ago in Western Europe is still the benchmark for me. Before our time but not by much. Those are modern times and that was no third world shithole. A fraction of an inch into our past on any timeline.

The mindset that modern progressive populations are past that kind of thing is childish fantasy.
 
For the record sys's comment wasn't about 3rd world countries like the donk is proposing. It was that Genocide would never happen in our life time. That governments would intervene and put a stop to it. The rebuttal was that in fact it could happen and us gun people would go a head and hang on to our guns. I tried to look this up the easy way last night but I guess this site only hold ten pages on the profiles of posters so I will have to go through this forum page by page. If one of with a better memory knew the thread like title or something that would go a long ways in helping me..

So... did you ever go through the forum page by page and find it?
 
Sys must still be at church since she has yet to respond.
 
Praying for all those abortions.

Wait, no he's not. Baby-killing = the Sys way.
 
How do you make a crazy liberal disappear? You update rivals where it saves every thread and repost their crazy lies. Funny how quick you disappeared there sys. Feel the Bern.
 
How do you make a crazy liberal disappear? You update rivals where it saves every thread and repost their crazy lies. Funny how quick you disappeared there sys. Feel the Bern.
You'll have to give sisskatine a little time. She's still trying to figure out how we knew she was lying about owning two dozen plus guns. Pulling shit out of your ass is so easy a chimp or a liberal can do it.

The real challenge is convincing others it's more than a turd from your ass. She probably still sees the shine while everybody else smells the stench. HilLIARy actually has idiots that have voted for her. sisskatine is a bootlicker, so you'll have to wait for some Huffpo talking points covering your question to come out before she can answer them.

Patience Vito Grasshopper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JonnyVito
@syskatine see medics post above you been busted but that's for playing.

Hi Jonny. I haven't been on the boards this weekend, and I'm sorry.

1.
For the record sys's comment wasn't about 3rd world countries like the donk is proposing. It was that Genocide would never happen in our life time. That governments would intervene and put a stop to it.

So where's the thread where I said this? Context, please? Were we discussing U.S. affairs (like second amendment arguments typically cover) or other countries (as second amendment arguments sometimes cover.) I suspect you interposed the whole world with every political and cultural environment into a discussion of U.S. politics in an effort to find something to be alarmed about, but I want to see the thread first. I predict you blew up a statement in a convo about gun control in the u.s. and applied it to the world.

2.
so I will have to go through this forum page by page.

You didn't go through the forum page by page, did you? LIAR!!! SHOW ME WHERE YOU WENT THROUGH THE FORUM PAGE BY PAGE. NOW, LYING LIAR IN YOUR LYING PANTS.

3.
I am voting by damn and I am going to stick it to those BULLY'S Hillary and Bernie

Plural possessive vs. Plural vs. singular possessive can be tricky. You don't automatically use an apostrophe just because you're talking about multiples of something. "The cows sat on the ground." That's just talking about multiple cows. so you don't need an apostrophe. "The cow's feed is in the barn." In that statement, the feed belongs to the cow. The "cow" is possessive, because you're talking about the cow owning something - possessing it. So what can we do when writing, if you're wanting to possess something, or claim it for that noun? Since you're talking possessive, let's round it up! Use a lasso! Let's put the apostrophe up there like a lasso, that means you're going to possess it. A good rule of thumb is that if the noun is possessing something, get out that lasso (apostrophes kind of loop down, like a comma) out and round it up! You don't need to get it with a lasso if it's just a plain old cow, though.

4. Now post the thread. If we were discussing other countries, ok. If we were discussing the U.S. gun policies, and I said there isn't gonna be a holocaust, and you transposed that statement to a broader conversation about third world countries (that have JUST HAD GENOCIDES!) to try to impute me as not acknowledging basic history, I'll say this: you're just stupid and chickenshit enough that you probably did that and have never questioned that as an intellectually honest move. Link, please. Let's take a look at the context.
 
You are such a tool. The quote is right there. I am done wasting time on your donkey ass. You are worthless and a liar. I caught you and you still won't admit you were wrong.
 
You are such a tool. The quote is right there. I am done wasting time on your donkey ass. You are worthless and a liar. I caught you and you still won't admit you were wrong.

So... you did, didn't you? You took a statement from a debate about U.S. policy, the second amendment, applied it out of context to different facts (Rwanda? Syria?) , and then use that statement as an example of how I don't understand a matter of U.S. public policy. You really are a deceptive chickenshit. This isn't Fox news. Other conservatives on here aren't that stupid and dishonest, either. Nobody but you. What a clumsy, junior high, chickenshit move. If I'm wrong, give me the link. You have it. Prove you're not a chickenshit and post the link.
 
So... you did, didn't you? You took a statement from a debate about U.S. policy, the second amendment, applied it out of context to different facts (Rwanda? Syria?) , and then use that statement as an example of how I don't understand a matter of U.S. public policy. You really are a deceptive chickenshit. This isn't Fox news. Other conservatives on here aren't that stupid and dishonest, either. Nobody but you. What a clumsy, junior high, chickenshit move. If I'm wrong, give me the link. You have it. Prove you're not a chickenshit and post the link.

Why do I have to do all your work? I see why you love Bernie so much you are a POS lazy SOB. Go find the thread I already did and your quote is here. It isn't my job to clear your name. If you want that done then you need to provide the quotes. thanks for playing but you said it, it is quoted and nothing was added. You said it wouldn't happen it is happening. You were wrong and just don't have enough integrity to admit it. There is nothing more tho this story other then that. I wouldn't even put you in with others liberals as I know good liberals and you really are just a POS. Have a great day. If you want to clear your name then I suggest you get your research hat on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: windriverrange
Why do I have to do all your work? I see why you love Bernie so much you are a POS lazy SOB. Go find the thread I already did and your quote is here. It isn't my job to clear your name. If you want that done then you need to provide the quotes. thanks for playing but you said it, it is quoted and nothing was added. You said it wouldn't happen it is happening. You were wrong and just don't have enough integrity to admit it. There is nothing more tho this story other then that. I wouldn't even put you in with others liberals as I know good liberals and you really are just a POS. Have a great day. If you want to clear your name then I suggest you get your research hat on.

It is true then -- you took a statement in a debate about U.S. policy, then pretended it had to do with something that was NOT U.S. policy, and then claim the statement is false when you put it into that different context. Then, you use that to try and make an argument in the original debate about U.S. policy.

You did it because you have no internal morality beyond what Sean Hannity tells you -- you never stopped and asked if that was a fair representation. Edit: My adjectives have been deleted. I'm trying to be a gentler, kinder liberal. We'll see....
 
Last edited:
You have to be the worst lawyer ever. Keep trying but I own you. You have yet to show supporting quotes to back up your argument. Sorry if I don't just take your lying word.
 
Who the fu** is Sean Hannity should I know that name?

You really don't know that, do you? After reading all this, you also really don't understand the concept of taking a quote out of context and I'm just ripping you to pieces, in writing.

At this point I'm going to practice what I preach. It's on me for being so mean to you. Have a good one, Jonny. I'm glad you're so interested in democracy. You're just as important to the country as the so-called "smart" people that make all the stoopid decisions.
 
You really don't know that, do you? After reading all this, you also really don't understand the concept of taking a quote out of context and I'm just ripping you to pieces, in writing.

At this point I'm going to practice what I preach. It's on me for being so mean to you. Have a good one, Jonny. I'm glad you're so interested in democracy. You're just as important to the country as the so-called "smart" people that make all the stoopid decisions.

Translation I lost like a bit** so now I am going to throw crap at the wall and walk away. I have your quote bi*** you have nothing but your word which is about as good as Hillary. I caught you in a lie and now you are spinning. Also the only Fox News host I know or watch ever is Kelly. Thanks for playing again good buddy. I can't wait for you to have quotes backing up your statements until then your word is just that your word which is about as valuable as dog shit.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT